Literature DB >> 30447128

A hand-eye calibration method for augmented reality applied to computer-assisted orthopedic surgery.

Marcelo E de Oliveira1, Henrique G Debarba1, Alexandre Lädermann2,3, Sylvain Chagué1, Caecilia Charbonnier1,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Augmented reality (AR) allows the surgeon to represent holographic patient-specific anatomical information and surgical instruments in the physical world. To correctly superimpose virtual and physical objects, a hand-eye (HE) calibration method for mapping the virtual and physical spaces was proposed.
METHODS: Mathematical relationships between the virtual camera and the physical space were derived. Finally, the accuracy and robustness of the proposed HE calibration method were qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated.
RESULTS: The proposed calibration method allows us to determine an optimal invariant spatiotemporal mapping between the virtual camera and the physical space.
CONCLUSION: Qualitatively and quantitatively reliable and accurate estimates for the physical-virtual mapping transformation were verified. Consequently, imaging data and surgical instruments holograms can be precisely represented in the physical space.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  augmented reality; calibration; computer-assisted surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30447128     DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Robot        ISSN: 1478-5951            Impact factor:   2.547


  8 in total

1.  Co-localized augmented human and X-ray observers in collaborative surgical ecosystem.

Authors:  Javad Fotouhi; Mathias Unberath; Tianyu Song; Jonas Hajek; Sing Chun Lee; Bastian Bier; Andreas Maier; Greg Osgood; Mehran Armand; Nassir Navab
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  VCSEL pair used as optical pointers in a contact lens for gaze tracking and visual target designation.

Authors:  François-Maël Robert; Vincent Nourrit; Laure Adam; Jean-Louis de Bougrenet de la Tocnaye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 3.  Opportunities and challenges of using augmented reality and heads-up display in orthopaedic surgery: A narrative review.

Authors:  Joon Ha; Priya Parekh; David Gamble; James Masters; Peter Jun; Thomas Hester; Timothy Daniels; Mansur Halai
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-05-05

Review 4.  Registration Techniques for Clinical Applications of Three-Dimensional Augmented Reality Devices.

Authors:  Christopher M Andrews; Alexander B Henry; Ignacio M Soriano; Michael K Southworth; Jonathan R Silva
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 3.316

5.  Facial model collection for medical augmented reality in oncologic cranio-maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Christina Gsaxner; Jürgen Wallner; Xiaojun Chen; Wolfgang Zemann; Jan Egger
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 6.444

6.  HoloLens 1 vs. HoloLens 2: Improvements in the New Model for Orthopedic Oncological Interventions.

Authors:  Alicia Pose-Díez-de-la-Lastra; Rafael Moreta-Martinez; Mónica García-Sevilla; David García-Mato; José Antonio Calvo-Haro; Lydia Mediavilla-Santos; Rubén Pérez-Mañanes; Felix von Haxthausen; Javier Pascau
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 7.  From Diagnosis to Therapy: The Role of Virtual and Augmented Reality in Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery.

Authors:  Aditya Gupta; Ratnakar Ambade
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-13

8.  Value of the surgeon's sightline on hologram registration and targeting in mixed reality.

Authors:  Javier A Luzon; Bojan V Stimec; Arne O Bakka; Bjørn Edwin; Dejan Ignjatovic
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 2.924

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.