Literature DB >> 30446958

Issues in the Design of Discrete Choice Experiments.

Richard Norman1, Benjamin M Craig2, Paul Hansen3, Marcel F Jonker4,5,6, John Rose7, Deborah J Street8, Brendan Mulhern8.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2019        PMID： 30446958     DOI： 10.1007/s40271-018-0346-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient        ISSN： 1178-1653            Impact factor:   3.883


× No keyword cloud information.
  14 in total

1.  Effect of Level Overlap and Color Coding on Attribute Non-Attendance in Discrete Choice Experiments.

Authors:  Marcel F Jonker; Bas Donkers; Esther W de Bekker-Grob; Elly A Stolk
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 5.725

2.  Symposium Title: Preference Evidence for Regulatory Decisions.

Authors:  Juan Marcos Gonzalez; F Reed Johnson; Bennett Levitan; Rebecca Noel; Holly Peay
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Accounting for Attribute-Level Non-Attendance in a Health Choice Experiment: Does it Matter?

Authors:  Seda Erdem; Danny Campbell; Arne Risa Hole
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Key Issues and Potential Solutions for Understanding Healthcare Preference Heterogeneity Free from Patient-Level Scale Confounds.

Authors:  Catharina G M Groothuis-Oudshoorn; Terry N Flynn; Hong Il Yoo; Jay Magidson; Mark Oppe
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Preference for subcutaneous or intravenous administration of rituximab among patients with untreated CD20+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma or follicular lymphoma: results from a prospective, randomized, open-label, crossover study (PrefMab).

Authors:  M Rummel; T M Kim; F Aversa; W Brugger; E Capochiani; C Plenteda; F Re; P Trask; S Osborne; R Smith; A Grigg
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force.

Authors:  F Reed Johnson; Emily Lancsar; Deborah Marshall; Vikram Kilambi; Axel Mühlbacher; Dean A Regier; Brian W Bresnahan; Barbara Kanninen; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.725

7.  Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making--An Introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force.

Authors:  Praveen Thokala; Nancy Devlin; Kevin Marsh; Rob Baltussen; Meindert Boysen; Zoltan Kalo; Thomas Longrenn; Filip Mussen; Stuart Peacock; John Watkins; Maarten Ijzerman
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 8.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Michael D Clark; Domino Determann; Stavros Petrou; Domenico Moro; Esther W de Bekker-Grob
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Using a discrete choice experiment to value the QLU-C10D: feasibility and sensitivity to presentation format.

Authors:  R Norman; R Viney; N K Aaronson; J E Brazier; D Cella; D S J Costa; P M Fayers; G Kemmler; S Peacock; A S Pickard; D Rowen; D J Street; G Velikova; T A Young; M T King
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 10.  Sample Size Requirements for Discrete-Choice Experiments in Healthcare: a Practical Guide.

Authors:  Esther W de Bekker-Grob; Bas Donkers; Marcel F Jonker; Elly A Stolk
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.883
View more
  4 in total

1.  Support Tools for Preference-Sensitive Decisions in Healthcare: Where Are We? Where Do We Go? How Do We Get There?

Authors:  Jan Ostermann; Derek S Brown; Janine A van Til; Nick Bansback; France Légaré; Deborah A Marshall; Meenakshi Bewtra
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Patient Preferences in the Medical Product Lifecycle.

Authors:  Jennifer A Whitty; Esther W de Bekker-Grob; Nigel S Cook; Fern Terris-Prestholt; Michael Drummond; Rocco Falchetto; Hans L Hillege
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Do preferences differ based on respondent experience of a health issue and its treatment? A case study using a public health intervention.

Authors:  David J Mott; Laura Ternent; Luke Vale
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2022-06-18

4.  Self-esteem in patients with venous thromboembolism predicts time trade-off values for own health.

Authors:  Peep F M Stalmeier; Eva E Volmeijer
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 3.186
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.