| Literature DB >> 30446684 |
Wei Li1,2, Minghong Tan3,4.
Abstract
With the rapid advance of urbanization, rural population emigration has become a key factor that affects the man-land relationship in China's mountainous areas and may have a huge impact on ecological restoration. This study used the NDVI in the growing seasons to analyze the variation trend of vegetation greenness at different elevations in the Taihang Mountains during 2000-2010, employing trend analysis method. Then, we selected 990 samples, each of which was a circular area with a radius of 3 km. On this basis, we quantitatively analyzed the contribution degree of population emigration to this variation trend after eliminating the influences of precipitation, temperature, and other factors. The results showed that rural population emigration was significant in the Taihang Mountains in the past 10 years, with a rural population emigration rate of up to 16.3%; The vegetation in the Taihang Mountains presented a trend of overall improvement, but local deterioration; The results of the regression analysis showed that population emigration had significantly impacts on vegetation greenness at 1% significance level and 1% of population emigration can increase the NDVI variation trend by 0.06%. Furthermore, the impact gradually weakened with increasing elevation.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30446684 PMCID: PMC6240040 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-35108-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Spatial distribution of the average NDVI values in the growing seasons in the Taihang Mountains in 2000; (b) Spatial distribution of the trend of NDVI variation in the Taihang Mountains from 2000 to 2010.
Figure 2Average NDVI values at each elevation level of the Taihang Mountains from 2000 to 2010.
Collinearity diagnosis in the model of overall areas of the Taihang Mountains.
| Variables | VIF | Tolerance |
|---|---|---|
| Population density change | 1.25 | 0.799 |
| Land use intensity change | 1.24 | 0.806 |
| Slope temperature | 1.18 | 0.845 |
| Slope precipitation | 2.90 | 0.345 |
| Average gradient | 1.57 | 0.637 |
| Average aspect | 1.12 | 0.896 |
| Average elevation* | 3.71 | 0.269 |
| Mean VIF | 1.85 |
Note: * is the natural logarithmic of original average elevation.
Models of impact of population migration on trends of NDVI variation in the Taihang Mountains.
| Explained variable: Slope NDVI | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Standardized coefficients of Model 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Explanatory variable | Population density change | −0.072*** | −0.068*** | −0.065*** | −0.064*** | −0.060*** | −0.286 |
| (−12.87) | (−9.73) | (−8.88) | (−8.69) | (−7.74) | |||
| [−0.0722] | [−0.0685] | [−0.0655] | [−0.0637] | [−0.0597] | |||
| Land use intensity change | 0.666 | 0.397 | 0.233 | 0.053 | 0.003 | ||
| Control variable | (1.02) | (0.60) | (0.35) | (0.08) | |||
| Slope temperature@ | 0.299*** | 0.304*** | 0.158** | 0.070 | |||
| (4.39) | (4.49) | (2.18) | |||||
| Slope precipitation | 0.068*** | 0.027 | −0.095*** | −0.155 | |||
| (3.60) | (1.29) | (−3.11) | |||||
| Average aspect | 0.201*** | 0.154*** | 0.105 | ||||
| (4.46) | (3.38) | ||||||
| Average gradient | 0.368** | 0.005 | 0.001 | ||||
| (2.11) | (0.02) | ||||||
| Average elevation@@ | 12.68*** | 0.311 | |||||
| (5.55) | |||||||
| Constant | 77.305*** | 72.575*** | 64.535*** | 28.849*** | −31.428** | ||
| (68.85) | (68.73) | (35.25) | (3.67) | (−2.45) | |||
| Number of observations | 990 | 990 | 990 | 990 | 990 | ||
| Adjusted R−squared | 0.120 | 0.122 | 0.152 | 0.172 | 0.198 | ||
| AIC | 9724.023 | 9724.247 | 9693.021 | 9673.441 | 9643.8 | ||
| F | 165.65 | 81.50 | 42.32 | 32.97 | 29.60 | ||
Note: (1) The figures in () are t values; (2) The numbers in [] represent the marginal effect of population density change; (3) *, **, *** are coefficients different from zero at 10%, 5%, and 1% significance levels, respectively; (4) @ is 1,000 times that of Slope Temperature, @@ is the natural logarithmic of the original average elevation. (5) Standard error was adjusted for clusters in each sample; (6) All models were implemented by STATA13.0.
Explanatory model for trend of NDVI variation in regions with lower, middle, and higher elevation.
| Explained variable: Slope NDVI | Model 6 Lower elevation | Model 7 Middle elevation | Model 8 Higher elevation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Explanatory variable | Population density change | −0.055*** | −0.073*** | −0.048 |
| (−6.83) | (−6.03) | (−1.47) | ||
| [−0.0545] | [-0.0734] | [−0.0480] | ||
| Control variable | Land use intensity change | 0.155 | −0.689 | 2.15*** |
| (0.25) | (−0.33) | (3.04) | ||
| Slope temperature@ | 0.093 | 0.178 | 0.468*** | |
| (0.70) | (1.52) | (4.35) | ||
| Slope precipitation | 1.02*** | −0.054 | -0.089 | |
| (4.21) | (−0.59) | (−2.66) | ||
| Average aspect | 0.090 | 0.133 | 0.173** | |
| (1.01) | (1.58) | (2.57) | ||
| Average gradient | 0.497 | 0.812*** | −1.53*** | |
| (0.90) | (2.69) | (−5.47) | ||
| Constant | 31.056** | 40.313 ** | 76.501 *** | |
| (2.19) | (2.52) | (5.94) | ||
| Number of observations | 245 | 324 | 421 | |
| Adjusted R−squared | 0. 379 | 0.160 | 0.201 | |
| F | 25.65 | 16.22 | 14.78 | |
Note: (1) The figures in () are t values; (2) The numbers in [] represent the marginal effects of PDC; (3) *, **, *** are coefficients different from zero at 10%, 5%, and 1% significance levels, respectively; (4) @ is 1,000 times that of Slope Temperature. (5) Standard error was adjusted for clusters in each sample; (6) All models were implemented by STATA13.0.
Standardized coefficients of explanatory models for trend of NDVI variation in regions with lower, middle, and higher elevation of the Taihang Mountains.
| Variable | Lower elevation | Middle elevation | Higher elevation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Population density change | −0.071 | ||
| Land use intensity change | 0.015 | −0.033 | |
| Slope temperature* | 0.041 | 0.084 | |
| Slope precipitation | −0.032 | −0.131 | |
| Average gradient | 0.071 | ||
| Average aspect | 0.053 | 0.094 |
Note: * is 1,000 times that of Slope Temperature.
Figure 3Spatial distribution of population density change rate during the period 2000–2010 in the Taihang Mountains.
Figure 4DEM map and spatial distribution of sample areas in the Taihang Mountains.
Main indicators impacting the changes of vegetation greenness in the Taihang Mountains.
| Factor | Description | Variable | Index | Unit | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natural factors | |||||
| Control variable | Temperature | Variation in trend of temperature for 2000-2010, calculated using Equation (1) | Slope temperature | ST | — |
| Precipitation | Variation in trend of precipitation for 2000–2010, calculated using Equation (1) | Slope precipitation | SP | — | |
| Gradient | Average gradient | Average gradient | AG | Degree | |
| Aspect | Average aspect | Average aspect | AA | — | |
| Elevation | Average elevation | Average elevation | AE | Meters | |
| Human activities | |||||
| Land use | Land use intensity change from 2000 to 2010, calculated by the formula (2) | Land use intensity change | LUIC | — | |
| Explanatory variable | Population | Population density change from 2000 to 2010 | Population density change | PDC | Inhabitants/m² |
Summary statistics of variables of the vegetation change explanatory model for the Taihang Mountains.
| Variable | N | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | S.D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population density change | 990 | −355.44 | 1022.94 | 10.23 | 126.88 |
| Land use intensity change | 990 | −25.64 | 10.85 | −0.46 | 1.91 |
| Slope temperature* | 990 | −33.07 | 37.68 | 8.91 | 15.32 |
| Slope precipitation | 990 | −8.45 | 271.41 | 76.55 | 54.26 |
| Average gradient | 990 | 0.48 | 24.36 | 10.42 | 6.61 |
| Average aspect | 990 | 84.55 | 286.12 | 173.77 | 23.82 |
| Average elevation** | 990 | 3.02 | 7.64 | 6.52 | 0.79 |
| NDVI_Slope*** | 990 | −38.45 | 1875.53 | 71.57 | 32.07 |
Note: (1) The total number of samples is 990; (2) * is 1,000 times that of Slope Temperature, ** is the natural logarithmic of original Average Elevation, and *** is 10,000 times that of NDVI Slope; (3) all operations were implemented by Stata 13.0.