Literature DB >> 30446539

Object features and T4/T5 motion detectors modulate the dynamics of bar tracking by Drosophila.

Mehmet F Keleş1, Jean-Michel Mongeau1, Mark A Frye2.   

Abstract

Visual objects can be discriminated by static spatial features such as luminance or dynamic features such as relative movement. Flies track a solid dark vertical bar moving on a bright background, a behavioral reaction so strong that for a rigidly tethered fly, the steering trajectory is phase advanced relative to the moving bar, apparently in anticipation of its future position. By contrast, flickering bars that generate no coherent motion or have a surface texture that moves in the direction opposite to the bar generate steering responses that lag behind the stimulus. It remains unclear how the spatial properties of a bar influence behavioral response dynamics. Here,  we show that a dark bar defined by its luminance contrast to the uniform background drives a co-directional steering response that is phase advanced relative to the response to a textured bar defined only by its motion relative to a stationary textured background. The textured bar drives an initial contra-directional turn and phase-locked tracking. The qualitatively distinct response dynamics could indicate parallel visual processing of a luminance versus motion-defined object. Calcium imaging shows that T4/T5 motion-detecting neurons are more responsive to a solid dark bar than a motion-defined bar. Genetically blocking T4/T5 neurons eliminates the phase-advanced co-directional response to the luminance-defined bar, leaving the orientation response largely intact. We conclude that T4/T5 neurons mediate a co-directional optomotor response to a luminance-defined bar, thereby driving phase-advanced wing kinematics, whereas separate unknown visual pathways elicit the contra-directional orientation response.
© 2019. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Feature detection; Fly flight; Motion vision; Tethered flight; Visual behavior

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30446539      PMCID: PMC6361104          DOI: 10.1242/jeb.190017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  54 in total

1.  Flies see second-order motion.

Authors:  Jamie Carroll Theobald; Brian J Duistermars; Dario L Ringach; Mark A Frye
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  A directional tuning map of Drosophila elementary motion detectors.

Authors:  Matthew S Maisak; Juergen Haag; Georg Ammer; Etienne Serbe; Matthias Meier; Aljoscha Leonhardt; Tabea Schilling; Armin Bahl; Gerald M Rubin; Aljoscha Nern; Barry J Dickson; Dierk F Reiff; Elisabeth Hopp; Alexander Borst
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Asymmetric processing of visual motion for simultaneous object and background responses.

Authors:  Lisa M Fenk; Andreas Poehlmann; Andrew D Straw
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  The Emergence of Directional Selectivity in the Visual Motion Pathway of Drosophila.

Authors:  James A Strother; Shiuan-Tze Wu; Allan M Wong; Aljoscha Nern; Edward M Rogers; Jasmine Q Le; Gerald M Rubin; Michael B Reiser
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Object tracking in motion-blind flies.

Authors:  Armin Bahl; Georg Ammer; Tabea Schilling; Alexander Borst
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Drosophila fly straight by fixating objects in the face of expanding optic flow.

Authors:  Michael B Reiser; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Optical detection and fixation of objects by fixed flying flies.

Authors:  W Reichardt; H Wenking
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1969-08

8.  Spontaneous pattern preferences of Drosophila melanogaster to black areas in various parts of the visual field.

Authors:  R Wehner
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 2.354

9.  Spatial organization of visuomotor reflexes in Drosophila.

Authors:  Lance F Tammero; Mark A Frye; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  The free-flight response of Drosophila to motion of the visual environment.

Authors:  Markus Mronz; Fritz-Olaf Lehmann
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  3 in total

1.  Olfactory and Neuromodulatory Signals Reverse Visual Object Avoidance to Approach in Drosophila.

Authors:  Karen Y Cheng; Rachel A Colbath; Mark A Frye
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Visuomotor strategies for object approach and aversion in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Mongeau; Karen Y Cheng; Jacob Aptekar; Mark A Frye
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Fly eyes are not still: a motion illusion in Drosophila flight supports parallel visual processing.

Authors:  Wael Salem; Benjamin Cellini; Mark A Frye; Jean-Michel Mongeau
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 3.312

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.