| Literature DB >> 30445803 |
Shalli Rani1, Sajjad Hussain Chauhdary2.
Abstract
Various heterogeneous devices or objects will be integrated for transparent and seamless communication under the umbrella of Internet of things (IoT). This would facilitate the open access of data for the growth of various digital services. Building a general framework of IoT is a complex task because of the heterogeneity in devices, technologies, platforms and services operating in the same system. In this paper, we mainly focus on the framework for Big Data analytics in Smart City applications, which being a broad category specifies the different domains for each application. IoT is intended to support the vision of Smart City, where advance technologies will be used for communication to improve the quality of life of citizens. A novel approach is proposed in this paper to enhance energy conservation and reduce the delay in Big Data gathering at tiny sensor nodes used in IoT framework. To implement the Smart City scenario in terms of Big Data in IoT, an efficient (optimized in quality of service) wireless sensor network (WSN) is required where communication of nodes is energy efficient. Thus, a new protocol, QoS-IoT(quality of service enabled IoT), is proposed on the top layer of the proposed architecture (the five-layer architecture consists of technology, data source, data management, application and utility programs) which is validated over the traditional protocols.Entities:
Keywords: Big Data analytics; Internet of things; QoS-IoT; Smart City; WSN; energy efficiency; green computing
Year: 2018 PMID: 30445803 PMCID: PMC6263949 DOI: 10.3390/s18113980
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Structure of Smart City Big Data Analytics.
Figure 2Implementation framework.
Parameters used in QoS-IoT.
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
|
| (200, 200) m |
|
| (100, 200) m |
|
| 1055 |
|
| 0.5 joules |
|
| 50 nJ/bit |
|
| 10 pJ/bit/m2 |
|
| 0.0013 pJ/bit/m4 |
|
| 87 m |
|
| 5 nJ/bit/signal |
|
| 4000 bits |
Figure 3Network scenario.
Figure 4Network lifetime in reference to the remaining energy of nodes.
Figure 5Network lifetime in reference to the energy depletion of nodes.
Figure 6Comparison of variance of the protocols in network throughput.
Figure 7Comparison of standard deviation of the network throughput.