| Literature DB >> 30445716 |
Marco Roveri1, Francesca Gherardi2, Luigi Brambilla3, Chiara Castiglioni4, Lucia Toniolo5.
Abstract
The use of hybrid nanocoatings for the protection of natural stones has received increasing attention over the last years. However, the interaction of these materials with stones and, in particular, its modification resulting from the blending of nanoparticles and matrices, are yet little explored. In this work, the interaction of two nanocomposite coatings (based on alkylalkoxysilane matrices and TiO₂ nanoparticles in water and 2-propanol) with two different porous stones is examined in detail by comparing their absorption behaviour and protection performance with those of the respective TiO₂-free matrices. It is shown that the protective effectiveness of both matrices is not negatively affected by the presence of TiO₂, as the desired water barrier effect is retained, while a significant photocatalytic activity is achieved. The addition of titania leads to a partial aggregation of the water-based matrix and accordingly reduces the product penetration into stones. On the positive side, a chemical interaction between titania and this matrix is observed, probably resulting in a greater stability of nanoparticles inside the protective coating. Moreover, although an effect of TiO₂ on the chemical stability of matrices is observed upon UV light exposure, the protective performance of coatings is substantially maintained after ageing, while the interaction between matrices and nanoparticles results in a good retention of the latter upon in-lab simulated rain wash-out.Entities:
Keywords: TiO2 nanoparticles; UV ageing; alkylalkoxysilane; artificial rain; durability; photo-oxidative degradation; photocatalysis; stone protection; water-repellency
Year: 2018 PMID: 30445716 PMCID: PMC6266438 DOI: 10.3390/ma11112289
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Photographs of Ajarte (A) and Obernkirchen (B) stone specimens.
Main properties of the components used for the preparation of WNC and ANC, namely TiO2 NPs (nTiO2-W and nTiO2-A) and alkylalkoxysilane matrices (m-WNC and m-ANC), as reported by the producers: chemical composition, solvent, concentration (w/w) and nanoparticle size (nm).
| Component | Description | Solvent | Concentration | NPs Size 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| nTiO2-W | TiO2 NPs | water (pH 1.5) | 5.5% | 50 ± 10 |
| nTiO2-A | TiO2 NPs | 1,2-propanediol | 12% | 20 ± 5 |
| m-WNC | water (pH 4.5) | 15% | - | |
| m-ANC | 2-methylpropyl trimethoxysilane | 2-propanol | 40% | - |
1 measured by Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS).
Composition (w/w) of WNC and ANC, as reported by the producers.
| Product | Solvent | Composition |
|---|---|---|
| WNC | water | 0.96% nTiO2-W |
| ANC | 2-propanol | 0.12% nTiO2-A |
Figure 2Water absorption by capillarity in untreated lithotypes.
Main properties of the products (WNC, ANC) and respective matrices (m-WNC and m-ANC): density (g/cm3), viscosity (mPa·s) and particle size (nm).
| Density | Viscosity | Particle Size | |
|---|---|---|---|
| WNC | 1.03 | 10 ± 1 | 105.9 ± 0.4 1 |
| m-WNC | 1.03 | 10 ± 1 | 82.8 ± 0.2 |
| ANC | 0.84 | 7 ± 1 | 25 ± 1 1 |
| m-ANC | 0.84 | 11 ± 3 | - |
1 data taken from [37].
Figure 3Raman spectra of dry TiO2 dispersions (nTiO2-W and n-TiO2-A) with indication of peak positions for anatase (A) and rutile (R) crystals.
Figure 4Raman spectra of dry nTiO2-W/m-WNC mixtures at different weight ratios: pure TiO2, 10:1, 2:1, 1:1, 1:5 and pure m-WNC.
Volume of liquid treatments (μL/cm2) absorbed by Ajarte and Obernkirchen stones. Values are averaged on 3 specimens.
| WNC | m-WNC | ANC | m-ANC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ajarte | 122 ± 17 | 203 ± 47 | 408 ± 6 | 411 ± 7 |
| Obernkirchen | 74 ± 5 | 213 ± 1 | 236 ± 19 | 219 ± 5 |
Values of ΔE*, ΔL*, Δa* and Δb* of Ajarte and Obernkirchen stones treated with WNC, ANC and their matrices. Values are averaged on 3 specimens.
| ΔE* | ΔL* | Δa* | Δb* | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AJARTE | WNC | 1.5 ± 0.3 | −0.9 ± 0.3 | −0.36 ± 0.06 | 1.1 ± 0.3 |
| m-WNC | 1 ± 1 | −0.6 ± 0.7 | −0.3 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.9 | |
| ANC | 2.2 ± 0.6 | −2.0 ± 0.8 | 0.21 ± 0.09 | −0.3 ± 0.9 | |
| m-ANC | 4 ± 2 | −3 ± 1 | 0.3 ± 0.3 | 1.5 ± 0.6 | |
| OBERN. | WNC | 2.6 ± 0.6 | −2.3 ± 0.5 | 0.15 ± 0.08 | 1.1 ± 0.4 |
| m-WNC | 2.5 ± 0.9 | −1.7 ± 0.7 | 0.08 ± 0.09 | 1.8 ± 0.5 | |
| ANC | 10 ± 1 | −8 ± 1 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 5 ± 1 | |
| m-ANC | 9 ± 1 | −7 ± 2 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 4.7 ± 0.6 |
Values of root mean square (RMS) surface Roughness (nm) of Ajarte and Obernkirchen stones: untreated and treated with WNC, m-WNC, ANC and m-ANC.
| Untreated | WNC | m-WNC | ANC | m-ANC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ajarte | 33 ± 3 | 5 | 1 | 37 | 38 |
| Obernkirchen | 7 ± 3 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 39 |
Amount of water absorbed per unit area at 96 h (Qi, mg·cm−2) and absorption rate at 30 min (AC, mg·cm−2·s−1/2) before (nt) and after (t) treatment with WNC, m-WNC, ANC and m-ANC for Ajarte and Obernkirchen stones and respective values of Relative Capillary Index (CIrel). Values are averaged on 3 specimens.
| Qi nt | Qi t | AC nt | AC t | CIrel | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AJARTE | WNC | 430 ± 20 | 79 ± 6 | 4.2 ± 0.6 | 0.144 ± 0.007 | 0.132 ± 0.008 |
| m-WNC | 430 ± 30 | 79 ± 3 | 5.2 ± 0.9 | 0.132 ± 0.001 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | |
| ANC | 447 ± 3 | 36 ± 3 | 4.6 ± 0.8 | 0.112 ± 0.004 | 0.063 ± 0.005 | |
| m-ANC | 438 ± 2 | 34 ± 4 | 5.1 ± 0.2 | 0.106 ± 0.003 | 0.061 ± 0.008 | |
| OBERN. | WNC | 257 ± 6 | 33 ± 5 | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 0.076 ± 0.005 | 0.09 ± 0.01 |
| m-WNC | 250 ± 4 | 36.4 ± 0.7 | 3.4 ± 0.4 | 0.070 ± 0.004 | 0.099 ± 0.001 | |
| ANC | 260 ± 20 | 18 ± 4 | 3.7 ± 0.6 | 0.075 ± 0.006 | 0.052 ± 0.008 | |
| m-ANC | 240 ± 10 | 14 ± 5 | 3.2 ± 0.6 | 0.057 ± 0.005 | 0.05 ± 0.01 |
Values of static contact angle (θ, °) of water before (nt) and after (t) treatment with WNC, m-WNC, ANC and m-ANC for Ajarte and Obernkirchen stones. Values for treated stones are averaged on 2 specimens.
| θ nt | θ t | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| AJARTE | WNC | <10 1 | 131 ± 14 |
| m-WNC | 139 ± 3 | ||
| ANC | 138 ± 2 | ||
| m-ANC | 142 ± 4 | ||
| OBERN. | WNC | 21 ± 2 | 140 ± 2 |
| m-WNC | 138 ± 1 | ||
| ANC | 133 ± 1 | ||
| m-ANC | 137 ± 1 |
1 contact angles on Ajarte are too low to be measured.
Ratio of discolouration values (D*) of Ajarte and Obernkirchen stones treated with WNC/ANC (D*PRODUCT) and corresponding values for the reference non-photocatalytic product Silres BS 290 (D*SILRES) after 30, 90 and 150 min irradiation.
| D*PRODUCT/D*SILRES | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 min | 90 min | 150 min | ||
| AJARTE | WNC 1 | 5.6 | 3.9 | 3.3 |
| m-WNC | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.6 | |
| ANC 1 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 2.0 | |
| m-ANC | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.8 | |
| OBERN. | WNC | 4.7 | 5.2 | 3.7 |
| m-WNC | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.5 | |
| ANC | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.7 | |
| m-ANC | 1.1 | - | 0.7 | |
1 data taken from [36].
Figure 5μ-FTIR spectra (ATR mode) of WNC and m-WNC films on glass slides before and after UV ageing for 600 h.
Figure 6μ-FTIR spectra (ATR mode) of ANC and m-ANC films on glass slides before and after UV ageing for 600 h.
Figure 7CIrel values of Ajarte and Obernkirchen stones treated with WNC, ANC, m-WNC and m-ANC before and after UV ageing for 600 h.
Figure 8Ratio of discolouration values (D*) of WNC (D*PRODUCT) and corresponding values for the reference non-photocatalytic product Silres BS 290 (D*SILRES) at 150 min irradiation for Ajarte and Obernkirchen stones after rain ageing for 30 h.