Paul Peng1, Anton Oscar Beitia1, Daniel J Vreeman2,3, George T Loo1, Bradley N Delman4, Frederick Thum1, Tina Lowry1, Jason S Shapiro1. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA. 2. Center for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. 3. Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract
Objective: We describe and evaluate the mapping of computerized tomography (CT) terms from 40 hospitals participating in a health information exchange (HIE) to a standard terminology. Methods: Proprietary CT exam terms and corresponding exam frequency data were obtained from 40 participant HIE sites that transmitted radiology data to the HIE from January 2013 through October 2015. These terms were mapped to the Logical Observations Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC®) terminology using the Regenstrief LOINC mapping assistant (RELMA) beginning in January 2016. Terms without initial LOINC match were submitted to LOINC as new term requests on an ongoing basis. After new LOINC terms were created, proprietary terms without an initial match were reviewed and mapped to these new LOINC terms where appropriate. Content type and token coverage were calculated for the LOINC version at the time of initial mapping (v2.54) and for the most recently released version at the time of our analysis (v2.63). Descriptive analysis was performed to assess for significant differences in content-dependent coverage between the 2 versions. Results: LOINC's content type and token coverages of HIE CT exam terms for version 2.54 were 83% and 95%, respectively. Two-hundred-fifteen new LOINC CT terms were created in the interval between the releases of version 2.54 and 2.63, and content type and token coverages, respectively, increased to 93% and 99% (P < .001). Conclusion: LOINC's content type coverage of proprietary CT terms across 40 HIE sites was 83% but improved significantly to 93% following new term creation.
Objective: We describe and evaluate the mapping of computerized tomography (CT) terms from 40 hospitals participating in a health information exchange (HIE) to a standard terminology. Methods: Proprietary CT exam terms and corresponding exam frequency data were obtained from 40 participantHIE sites that transmitted radiology data to the HIE from January 2013 through October 2015. These terms were mapped to the Logical Observations Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC®) terminology using the Regenstrief LOINC mapping assistant (RELMA) beginning in January 2016. Terms without initial LOINC match were submitted to LOINC as new term requests on an ongoing basis. After new LOINC terms were created, proprietary terms without an initial match were reviewed and mapped to these new LOINC terms where appropriate. Content type and token coverage were calculated for the LOINC version at the time of initial mapping (v2.54) and for the most recently released version at the time of our analysis (v2.63). Descriptive analysis was performed to assess for significant differences in content-dependent coverage between the 2 versions. Results: LOINC's content type and token coverages of HIE CT exam terms for version 2.54 were 83% and 95%, respectively. Two-hundred-fifteen new LOINC CT terms were created in the interval between the releases of version 2.54 and 2.63, and content type and token coverages, respectively, increased to 93% and 99% (P < .001). Conclusion: LOINC's content type coverage of proprietary CT terms across 40 HIE sites was 83% but improved significantly to 93% following new term creation.
Authors: Jason S Shapiro; Farzad Mostashari; George Hripcsak; Nicholas Soulakis; Gilad Kuperman Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-02-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Benjamin H Slovis; Tina Lowry; Bradley N Delman; Anton Oscar Beitia; Gilad Kuperman; Charles DiMaggio; Jason S Shapiro Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2016-05-13 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Daniel J Vreeman; Swapna Abhyankar; Kenneth C Wang; Christopher Carr; Beverly Collins; Daniel L Rubin; Curtis P Langlotz Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: ChulHyoung Park; Seng Chan You; Hokyun Jeon; Chang Won Jeong; Jin Wook Choi; Rae Woong Park Journal: Yonsei Med J Date: 2022-01 Impact factor: 2.759