Literature DB >> 30445157

Osseointegration and current interpretations of the bone-implant interface.

Furqan A Shah1, Peter Thomsen2, Anders Palmquist2.   

Abstract

Complex physical and chemical interactions take place in the interface between the implant surface and bone. Various descriptions of the ultrastructural arrangement to various implant design features, ranging from solid and macroporous geometries to surface modifications on the micron-, submicron-, and nano- levels, have been put forward. Here, the current knowledge regarding structural organisation of the bone-implant interface is reviewed with a focus on solid devices, mainly metal (or alloy) intended for permanent anchorage in bone. Certain biomaterials that undergo surface and bulk degradation are also considered. The bone-implant interface is a heterogeneous zone consisting of mineralised, partially mineralised, and unmineralised areas. Within the meso-micro-nano-continuum, mineralised collagen fibrils form the structural basis of the bone-implant interface, in addition to accumulation of non-collagenous macromolecules such as osteopontin, bone sialoprotein, and osteocalcin. In the published literature, as many as eight distinct arrangements of the bone-implant interface ultrastructure have been described. The interpretation is influenced by the in vivo model and species-specific characteristics, healing time point(s), physico-chemical properties of the implant surface, implant geometry, sample preparation route(s) and associated artefacts, analytical technique(s) and their limitations, and non-compromised vs compromised local tissue conditions. The understanding of the ultrastructure of the interface under experimental conditions is rapidly evolving due to the introduction of novel techniques for sample preparation and analysis. Nevertheless, the current understanding of the interface zone in humans in relation to clinical implant performance is still hampered by the shortcomings of clinical methods for resolving the finer details of the bone-implant interface. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Being a hierarchical material by design, the overall strength of bone is governed by composition and structure. Understanding the structure of the bone-implant interface is essential in the development of novel bone repair materials and strategies, and their long-term success. Here, the current knowledge regarding the eventual structural organisation of the bone-implant interface is reviewed, with a focus on solid devices intended for permanent anchorage in bone, and certain biomaterials that undergo surface and bulk degradation. The bone-implant interface is a heterogeneous zone consisting of mineralised, partially mineralised, and unmineralised areas. Within the meso-micro-nano-continuum, mineralised collagen fibrils form the structural basis of the bone-implant interface, in addition to accumulation of non-collagenous macromolecules such as osteopontin, bone sialoprotein, and osteocalcin.
Copyright © 2018 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomineralisation; Bone quality; Bone-implant interface; Implant design; Osseointegration; Osteocyte

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30445157     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.11.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  48 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanical behaviours of the bone-implant interface: a review.

Authors:  Xing Gao; Manon Fraulob; Guillaume Haïat
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  From tissue retrieval to electron tomography: nanoscale characterization of the interface between bone and bioactive glass.

Authors:  Chiara Micheletti; Pedro Henrique Silva Gomes-Ferreira; Travis Casagrande; Paulo Noronha Lisboa-Filho; Roberta Okamoto; Kathryn Grandfield
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 4.293

3.  Mineralizing Coating on 3D Printed Scaffolds for the Promotion of Osseointegration.

Authors:  Abshar Hasan; Romain Bagnol; Robert Owen; Arsalan Latif; Hassan M Rostam; Sherif Elsharkawy; Felicity R A J Rose; José Carlos Rodríguez-Cabello; Amir M Ghaemmaghami; David Eglin; Alvaro Mata
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-27

Review 4.  Evolution of anodised titanium for implant applications.

Authors:  J Alipal; T C Lee; P Koshy; H Z Abdullah; M I Idris
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-06-26

Review 5.  High resolution 3D structures of mineralized tissues in health and disease.

Authors:  Steve Weiner; Emeline Raguin; Ron Shahar
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 43.330

6.  Clinical and radiographic variables related to implants with simultaneous grafts among type 2 diabetic patients treated with different hypoglycemic medications: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Feng Ding; Shaojie Shi; Xiangdong Liu; Lei Wang; Xingxing Wang; Sijia Zhang; Guoqiang Zhao; Yingliang Song
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.757

7.  A Composite Lactide-Mineral 3D-Printed Scaffold for Bone Repair and Regeneration.

Authors:  Rayan Fairag; Li Li; Jose Luis Ramirez-GarciaLuna; M Scott Taylor; Brian Gaerke; Michael H Weber; Derek H Rosenzweig; Lisbet Haglund
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-07-09

8.  Cellular and Molecular Dynamics during Early Oral Osseointegration: A Comprehensive Characterization in the Lewis Rat.

Authors:  Sutton E Wheelis; Claudia C Biguetti; Shruti Natarajan; Alexandra Arteaga; Jihad El Allami; Bhuvana Lakkasettar Chandrashekar; Gustavo P Garlet; Danieli C Rodrigues
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2021-02-24

Review 9.  Osseointegrated Metallic Implants for Finger Amputees: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Chiara Bregoli; Carlo Alberto Biffi; Kavin Morellato; Emanuele Gruppioni; Matteo Primavera; Michele Rampoldi; Mario Lando; Roberto Adani; Ausonio Tuissi
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  mTORC2 regulates hierarchical micro/nano topography-induced osteogenic differentiation via promoting cell adhesion and cytoskeletal polymerization.

Authors:  Qian Gao; Yuying Hou; Zhe Li; Jinyang Hu; Dawei Huo; Huimin Zheng; Junjiang Zhang; Xiaoyu Yao; Rui Gao; Xudong Wu; Lei Sui
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 5.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.