Mimi R Borrelli1, Reem Farwana2, Tom W Andrew1, Maria Chicco3, Munir Abukhder2, Dima Mobarak4, Rachel Thavayogan5, Riaz Agha6, Thomas E Pidgeon7. 1. Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA. 2. School of Medical Education, University of Birmingham, Birmingham. 3. St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London. 4. Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham. 5. University of Nottingham, Nottingham. 6. Queen Victoria Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, University of Oxford, Oxford. 7. Birmingham Children's Hospital, Steelhouse Lane, Birmingham, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are gold standard assessments for healthcare interventions. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement was published to maximize RCT reporting transparency. The authors conducted a systematic review to assess current compliance of RCTs published within craniofacial surgery with the CONSORT statement. METHODS: The Thomson Reuters Impact Factor Report 2016 was consulted to identify craniofacial surgery journals. PubMed was used to search for recent RCTs published within the 5 journals identified. Two independent researchers assessed each study for inclusion and performed data extraction. The primary outcome was compliance of each RCT with the CONSORT statement. Secondary outcomes were the pathology and interventions examined, impact factor, multi-versus-single center, number of authors, and publication date. RESULTS: Eighty-six studies met the inclusion criteria, across which a median of 56% (range 33%-94%) applicable CONSORT items were reported. The 5 least reported items were: trial design (3a); registration number and name of trial registry (23); who generated random allocation sequences, enrolled participants, and assigned participants to interventions (10); sample size determination (7a); mentioning "randomized trial" in the title (1a). CONCLUSION: The compliance of craniofacial surgery RCTs with the CONSORT statement requires improvement. Areas in need are identified, and methods to improve reporting transparency, are discussed.
BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are gold standard assessments for healthcare interventions. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement was published to maximize RCT reporting transparency. The authors conducted a systematic review to assess current compliance of RCTs published within craniofacial surgery with the CONSORT statement. METHODS: The Thomson Reuters Impact Factor Report 2016 was consulted to identify craniofacial surgery journals. PubMed was used to search for recent RCTs published within the 5 journals identified. Two independent researchers assessed each study for inclusion and performed data extraction. The primary outcome was compliance of each RCT with the CONSORT statement. Secondary outcomes were the pathology and interventions examined, impact factor, multi-versus-single center, number of authors, and publication date. RESULTS: Eighty-six studies met the inclusion criteria, across which a median of 56% (range 33%-94%) applicable CONSORT items were reported. The 5 least reported items were: trial design (3a); registration number and name of trial registry (23); who generated random allocation sequences, enrolled participants, and assigned participants to interventions (10); sample size determination (7a); mentioning "randomized trial" in the title (1a). CONCLUSION: The compliance of craniofacial surgery RCTs with the CONSORT statement requires improvement. Areas in need are identified, and methods to improve reporting transparency, are discussed.
Authors: Vivienne C Bachelet; María S Navarrete; Constanza Barrera-Riquelme; Víctor A Carrasco; Matías Dallaserra; Rubén A Díaz; Álvaro A Ibarra; Francisca J Lizana; Nicolás Meza-Ducaud; Macarena G Saavedra; Camila Tapia-Davegno; Alonso F Vergara; Julio Villanueva Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2021-07-26 Impact factor: 4.615