Literature DB >> 30444757

How to Avoid Posterior Interosseous Nerve Injury During Single-Incision Distal Biceps Repair Drilling.

David Becker1, Francisco Antonio Lopez-Marambio, Niels Hammer, David Kieser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) is occasionally damaged during distal biceps tendon repair. But to our knowledge, no studies have examined the position of the PIN in relation to the bicipital tuberosity in full supination, which is the recommended position during single-incision distal biceps repair or reconstruction QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What is the anterior safe zone when exposing the anterior tuberosity with the arm in supination? (2) When drilling the radial tuberosity for bicortical button placement in full supination, how should the drill be angled to avoid PIN injury?
METHODS: Fifteen adult cadaver elbows had the PIN dissected around the proximal radius. The position of the PIN was measured relative to the most ulnar aspect of the radius at three sites in full supination: at the bicipital tuberosity (bicipital tuberosity-PIN), 10 mm proximal to the bicipital tuberosity (bicipital tuberosity-proximal), and 10 mm distal to the bicipital tuberosity (bicipital tuberosity-distal). We made another measurement by drawing a line from the lateral humeral epicondyle to the radial styloid. The point where the PIN intersects this line, when viewed laterally and measured from the lateral humeral epicondyle, was marked and measured to indicate where it wraps around the radius laterally (PIN-lateral). The last measurement (bicipital tuberosity-lateral) was made where the line from the lateral humeral epicondyle to the radial styloid intersected the position of the bicipital tuberosity. This was determined by the point where a perpendicular line from the bicipital tuberosity was drawn laterally to meet with the lateral line. We did this to establish if the PIN adopts its most lateral position on the radius at the same level as the bicipital tuberosity.
RESULTS: The anterior safe zone in the approach to the biceps tuberosity extends approximately 15 mm from its prominence (mean, 20.7 mm; range, 16.0-24.1 mm). The PIN crosses the lateral midline from anterior to posterior at 46.0 mm (range, 31.2-67.0 mm) from the lateral epicondyle (lying directly opposite the bicipital tuberosity at nearly the same level); therefore, the drill exit should be posterior to lateral midline while aiming proximally to the bicipital tuberosity.
CONCLUSION: Our anterior safe zone found that the PIN travels from an anterior position on the radius, when measuring 1 cm proximal to the bicipital tuberosity to a lateral position on the radius at the level of the bicipital tuberosity prominence (on the contralateral cortex), to a slightly more posterior position on the radius 1 cm distal to the bicipital tuberosity. Typically, the PIN sits directly opposite the biceps tuberosity, often directly on the cortex of the radius when the forearm is in full supination. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Because of these findings, perpendicular bicortical drilling starting at the bicipital tuberosity should be avoided. A more proximal and ulnar drilling angle is recommended. Defining a safe zone for an anterior approach seems to be clinically unhelpful due to the high anatomical variability that exists for the position of the PIN around the proximal radius. Future studies could attempt to confirm our findings with the analysis of noncadaveric imaging in three different planes using such modalities as MRI to avoid the effects of tissue distortion during cadaveric preparation and dissection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30444757      PMCID: PMC6370103          DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  16 in total

1.  Complications of repair of the distal biceps tendon with the modified two-incision technique.

Authors:  E W Kelly; B F Morrey; S W O'Driscoll
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  The risk injury to the posterior interosseous nerve in standard approaches to the proximal radius: a cadaver study.

Authors:  Nima Heidari; Tanja Kraus; Annelie M Weinberg; Andreas H Weiglein; Wolfgang Grechenig
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-08-28       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Anatomic pattern of the terminal branches of posterior interosseous nerve.

Authors:  Sadan Ay; Nihal Apaydin; Halil Acar; Metin Akinci; Ahmet Piskin; Ibrahim Tekdemir; Alaattin Elhan
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.414

Review 4.  Multiple nerve injuries following repair of a distal biceps tendon rupture--case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Marc R Fajardo; Zehava Rosenberg; Dimitrios Christoforou; John A I Grossman
Journal:  Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013)       Date:  2013

5.  The course of the posterior interosseous nerve in relation to the proximal radius: is there a reliable landmark?

Authors:  M Hackl; K Wegmann; S Lappen; C Helf; K J Burkhart; L P Müller
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  Clinical outcomes and safety of distal biceps repair using a modified entry point.

Authors:  Mohammed Baba; Johanna Viktoria Leon; Michael Symes; Oscar Dorrestijn; Allan Young; Benjamin Cass
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 1.872

7.  The effect of drill trajectory on proximity to the posterior interosseous nerve during cortical button distal biceps repair.

Authors:  Eddie Y Lo; Chin-Shang Li; James M Van den Bogaerde
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Repair of distal biceps tendon rupture: a new technique using the Endobutton.

Authors:  G I Bain; H Prem; R J Heptinstall; R Verhellen; D Paix
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  EndoButton-assisted repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Greenberg; John J Fernandez; Tongyu Wang; Charles Turner
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Rupture of the distal biceps brachii tendon: conservative treatment versus anatomic reinsertion--clinical and radiological evaluation after 2 years.

Authors:  Claudio Chillemi; Mario Marinelli; Vincenzo De Cupis
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2007-04-28       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  MRI findings of chronic distal tendon biceps reconstruction and associated post-operative findings.

Authors:  Dylan N Greif; Samuel H Huntley; Sameer Alidina; Julianne Muñoz; Joseph H Huntley; Harry G Greditzer; Jean Jose
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Anatomical intramedullary distal biceps tendon fixation. Our first experience.

Authors:  Pieter Caekebeke; Laurens Van Melkebeke; Joris Duerinckx; Roger van Riet
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2022-02-14

3.  Risk of Posterior Interosseous Nerve Injury During Distal Biceps Tendon Repair Using a Cortical Button.

Authors:  Brian Lynch; Alex Duke; David Komatsu; Edward Wang
Journal:  J Hand Surg Glob Online       Date:  2021-10-28

4.  Power-Optimizing Repair for Distal Biceps Tendon Rupture: Stronger and Safer.

Authors:  Joshua T Tadevich; Neel D Bhagat; Boon H Lim; Jinling Gao; Weinong W Chen; Gregory A Merrell
Journal:  J Hand Surg Glob Online       Date:  2021-07-08

5.  Phenoxyethanol-Based Embalming for Anatomy Teaching: An 18 Years' Experience with Crosado Embalming at the University of Otago in New Zealand.

Authors:  Brynley Crosado; Sabine Löffler; Benjamin Ondruschka; Ming Zhang; Johann Zwirner; Niels Hammer
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Relationship between the Branching Patterns of the Radial Nerve and Supinator Muscle.

Authors:  Anna Jeon; Ye-Gyung Kim; Seong-Oh Kwon; Je-Hun Lee
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.