| Literature DB >> 30444580 |
Songlin Guo1,2, Linlin Hu1,2, Jianjun Feng1,2, Peng Lin1,2, Le He1,2, Qingpi Yan1,2.
Abstract
The OMPs A (OmpA)-of Edwardsiella anguillarum and OmpU of V. vulnificus have been proven to be good antigens. In this study, after construction of a vector, a new recombinant Omp (rOMP) containing both OmpA and OmpU was expressed and purified. Then, the Japanese eels (Anguilla japonica) were intraperitoneally (i.p.) injected with the phosphate-buffered saline (PBS group), formalin-killed-cell (FKC group) or the recombinant Omp (rOMP group). The stimulation index of the whole blood cells in eels from FKC group was significantly higher than the eels from PBS and rOMP groups at 28 dpi; serum titers of anti-E. anguillarum and anti-V. vulnificus antibody of eels from FKC and rOMP group increased significantly at 21 and 28 dpi; in the rOMP group, eels serum titer stayed at a high level on 42 dpi. The activities of lysozyme in skin mucus, liver, kidney, and serum in three groups exhibited considerable changes. The relative percent survival (RPS) rate of eels from rOMP group were 100% and 83% when challenged with V. vulnificus or E. anguillarum. These results indicated that inoculation of rOMP would protect Japanese eels against the infection by E. anguillarum and V. vulnificus.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990Anguilla japonicazzm321990; zzm321990Edwardsiella anguillarumzzm321990; zzm321990Vibrio vulnificuszzm321990; expression; outer membrane protein; vaccine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30444580 PMCID: PMC6562130 DOI: 10.1002/mbo3.766
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiologyopen ISSN: 2045-8827 Impact factor: 3.139
Figure 1Amplified and combined of partial sequences of OmpU and OmpA. (a) The full‐length gene sequences of OmpU (lane 1) and OmpA (lane 2). (b) The partial gene sequences of 696 bp OmpU (lane 3) and 726 bp OmpA (lane 4). (c) The ligation fragment (lane 5) of OmpU‐OmpA. (d) The digestion fragment (digested by EcoR I and Sal I) of the ligated OmpU‐OmpA gene after it cloned into pMD19‐T vector (lane 6). (e) The digested pGex‐2T‐His vector (lane 7). M: DNA Marker
Figure 2SDS‐PAGE electrophoresis analysis of the expressed and purified expression OMP. M: protein Marker, 1: The expressed rOMP (arrow) after lyses whole cells of the expressed E. coli BL21; 2: the rOMP (arrow) purified by Ni2‐NTA method
Figure 3Immunogenicity prediction of the rOMP
Figure 4The survival and Relative Percent Survival (RPS) rate of Japanese eels (A. japonica) challenged (i.p.) by V. vulnificus (a) and E. anguillarum (b) 28 days post vaccinating, respectively. *: significant difference at p < 0.05 between rOMP and PBS control group at one time point post immunization
Figure 5Stimulation index of whole blood cells at different days after eels were immunized with inactivated bacteria vaccine and expressed OMP, data (the mean of SI) are presented as means ± SE (n = 5). Significant differences were found between groups of immunized fish and group of PBS injected fish at **p < 0.01 and between two immunized groups at ## p < 0.01
Figure 6Log2 of serum antigen‐specific antibody responses in immunized eels by ELISA. Data (the mean of OD492 nm readings) are presented as means ± SE (n = 5). Significant differences were found between groups of immunized fish and group of PBS injected fish at **p < 0.01 and *p < 0.05, and between two treating groups at ## p < 0.01
Figure 7Lysozyme activity measured in serum (a), skin mucus (b), liver (c), and kidney (d) in the different immunization antigens. Data (unit/ml) are presented as means ± SE (n = 5). Significant differences were found between groups of immunized fish and group of PBS injected fish at **p < 0.01 and *p < 0.05, and between two treating groups at ## p < 0.01 and # p < 0.05