| Literature DB >> 30443751 |
Luis Eduardo Juarez-Orozco1,2, Andrea G Monroy-Gonzalez3, Friso M van der Zant4, Nick Hoogvorst4, Riemer H J A Slart3,5, Remco J J Knol4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is thought that heart failure (HF) patients may benefit from the evaluation of mechanical (dys)synchrony, and an independent inverse relationship between myocardial perfusion and ventricular synchrony has been suggested. We explore the relationship between quantitative myocardial perfusion and synchrony parameters when accounting for the presence and extent of fixed perfusion defects in patients with chronic HF.Entities:
Keywords: Positron emission tomography; heart failure; mechanical synchrony; myocardial perfusion
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30443751 PMCID: PMC7749096 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-018-01507-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nucl Cardiol ISSN: 1071-3581 Impact factor: 5.952
Baseline population characteristics
| Variables | Summary |
|---|---|
| Demographics—mean (st dev) | |
| Age | 71 (9.6) |
| Women (%) | 43 (44) |
| BMI (Kg/m2) | 28 (4.3) |
| Risk factors and CV/HF history— | |
| HTN | 44 (45) |
| Dyslipidemia | 29 (26) |
| DM | 24 (25) |
| Smokers | 6 (6) |
| History of previous MI | 39 (40) |
| Ischemic HF | 50 (51) |
| Hypertensive cardiomyopathy | 17 (17) |
| Idiopathic HF | 19 (19) |
| NYHA classification | |
| I-II | 60 (6) |
| II | 54 (55) |
| III | 30 (31) |
| IV | 8 (8) |
| Reduced LVEF | 42 (43) |
| LVEF—mean (st dev) | 33 (8) |
| Mid-range LVEF | 16 (16) |
| LVEF—mean (st dev) | 45 (9) |
| Preserved LVEF | 40 (41) |
| LVEF—mean (st dev) | 63 (8) |
| NT-proBNP (pg/mL)—mean (st dev) | 483.4 (718.6) |
| Quantitative perfusion parameters—mean (st dev) | |
| Rest MBF (mL/g/min) | 0.93 (0.29) |
| Stress MBF (mL/g/min) | 1.72 (0.63) |
| MPR | 1.92 (0.61) |
| Semi-quantitative perfusion—mean (st dev) | |
| SRS | 10 (8.5) |
| Ventricular mechanical synchrony—mean (st dev) | |
| BW (ms) | 56 (39.5) |
| SD (ms) | 15.8 (11.8) |
| E (%) | 45 (12.9) |
BMI, body mass index; BW, bandwidth; CV, cardiovascular, DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; E, entropy; HF, heart failure; HTN, arterial hypertension; MBF, myocardial blood flow; MI, myocardial infarction; MPR, myocardial perfusion reserve; SD, standard deviation; SRS, summed rest score
Figure 1Bar chart depicting mean ventricular synchrony parameters (BW, SD, and E) across statistically defined MPR (upper chart) and sMBF (lower chart) tertiles. *p value < .5 for a post hoc corrected pairwise comparison
Biserial correlations between dependent variables
| BW | SD | E | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BW | 1 | 0.96* | 0.78* |
| SD | 0.96* | 1 | 0.77* |
| E | 0.78* | 0.77* | 1 |
BW, bandwidth; E, entropy; SD, standard deviation
*p value < .001
Figure 2Pictorial depiction of the MANCOVA adjusted effect sizes for all evaluated predictors across models 1 and 2. The correlational lines between individual predictors and dependent variables are weighted according to their magnitude (see Online Resource 2)
Figure 3Point chart depicting the magnitude of the multivariate adjusted effect sizes of quantitative PET myocardial perfusion parameters (MPR and sMBF) in Model 1 and Model 2 (SRS is depicted only in comparison to perfusion parameters for Model 2)