Gudrun C Thurner1, Paul Debbage2. 1. Department of Radiology, Innsbruck Medical University, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. 2. Division of Histology and Embryology, Department of Anatomy, Medical University Innsbruck, Muellerstrasse 59, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. Paul.Debbage@i-med.ac.at.
Abstract
We explore present-day trends and challenges in nanomedicine. Creativity in the laboratories continues: the published literature on novel nanoparticles is now vast. Nanoagents are discussed here which are composed entirely of strongly photoluminescent materials, tunable to desired optical properties and of inherently low toxicity. We focus on "quantum nanoparticles" prepared from allotropes of carbon. The principles behind strong, tunable photoluminescence are quantum mechanical: we present them in simple outline. The major industries racing to develop these materials can offer significant technical guidance to nanomedicine, which could help to custom-design strongly signalling nanoagents specifically for stated clinical applications. Since such agents are small, they can be targeted easily, making active targeting possible. We consider it timely now to study the interactions nanoparticles undergo with tissue components in living animals and to learn to understand and overcome the numerous barriers the organism interposes between the blood and targets in or on parenchymal cells. As the near infra-red spectrum opens up, detection of glowing nanoparticles several centimeters deep in a living human subject becomes calculable and we present a simple way to do this. Finally, we discuss the slow-fuse and resource-inefficient entry of nanoparticles into clinical application. A first possible reason is failure to target across the body's barriers, see above. Second, in the sparse translational landscape funding and support gaps yawn widely between academic research and subsequent development. We consider the agendas of the numerous "stakeholders" participating in this sad landscape and point to some faint glimmers of hope for the future.
We explore present-day trends and challenges innanomedicine. Creativity in the labo<n class="Chemical">span class="Species">ratories continues: the published lite<n class="Chemical">al">span class="Species">rature on novel nanoparticles is now vast. Nanoagents are discussed here which are composed entirely of strongly photoluminescent materials, tunable to desired optical properties and of inherently low toxicity. We focus on "quantum nanoparticles" prepared from allotropes of carbon. The principles behind strong, tunable photoluminescence are quantum mechanical: we present them in simple outline. The major industries racing to develop these materials can offer significant technical guidance to nanomedicine, which could help to custom-design strongly signalling nanoagents specifically for stated clinical applications. Since such agents are small, they can be targeted easily, making active targeting possible. We consider it timely now to study the interactions nanoparticles undergo with tissue components in living animals and to learn to understand and overcome the numerous barriers the organism interposes between the blood and targets in or on parenchymal cells. As the near infra-red spectrum opens up, detection of glowing nanoparticles several centimeters deep in a living human subject becomes calculable and we present a simple way to do this. Finally, we discuss the slow-fuse and resource-inefficient entry of nanoparticles into clinical application. A first possible reason is failure to target across the body's barriers, see above. Second, in the sparse translational landscape funding and support gaps yawn widely between academic research and subsequent development. We consider the agendas of the numerous "stakeholders" participating in this sad landscape and point to some faint glimmers of hope for the future.
Entities:
Keywords:
Nanomedicine; Nanotechnology; Near infrared; Quantum nanoparticles; Targeting; Translation
Authors: Warren R Zipfel; Rebecca M Williams; Richard Christie; Alexander Yu Nikitin; Bradley T Hyman; Watt W Webb Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-05-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Daniel R Larson; Warren R Zipfel; Rebecca M Williams; Stephen W Clark; Marcel P Bruchez; Frank W Wise; Watt W Webb Journal: Science Date: 2003-05-30 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Christopher Loo; Alex Lin; Leon Hirsch; Min-Ho Lee; Jennifer Barton; Naomi Halas; Jennifer West; Rebekah Drezek Journal: Technol Cancer Res Treat Date: 2004-02
Authors: E A Wallnöfer; G C Thurner; C Kremser; H Talasz; M M Stollenwerk; A Helbok; N Klammsteiner; K Albrecht-Schgoer; H Dietrich; W Jaschke; P Debbage Journal: Histochem Cell Biol Date: 2020-10-11 Impact factor: 4.304