PURPOSE: Nitisinone inhibits the cytochrome P450 (CYP) subfamilies CYP2C9, CYP2D6, and CYP2E1 and the organic anion transporter (OAT) isoforms OAT1 and OAT3 in vitro. Since the effect of nitisinone on these enzymes and transporters in humans is still unknown, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of nitisinone on these CYP subfamilies and OAT isoforms. METHODS: This was an open-label, nonrandomized, two-arm, phase 1 study (EudraCT: 2016-004297-17) in healthy volunteers. The substrates (tolbutamide, metoprolol, and chlorzoxazone for the respective CYPs and furosemide for the OATs) were administered as single doses, before and after 15 days of once daily dosing of 80 mg nitisinone, to determine the AUC∞ ratios ([substrate+nitisinone]/[substrate]). Nitisinone pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability were also assessed, and blood and urine were collected to determine substrate and nitisinone concentrations by LC-MS/MS. RESULTS: Thirty-six subjects were enrolled with 18 subjects included in each arm. The least square mean ratio (90% confidence interval) for AUC∞ was 2.31 (2.11-2.53) for tolbutamide, 0.95 (0.88-1.03) for metoprolol, 0.73 (0.67-0.80) for chlorzoxazone, and 1.72 (1.63-1.81) for furosemide. Clinically relevant nitisinone steady-state concentrations were reached after 12 days: mean Cav,ss of 94.08 μM. All treatments were well tolerated, and no safety concerns were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Nitisinone did not affect CYP2D6 activity, was a weak inducer of CYP2E1, and was a weak inhibitor of OAT1 and OAT3. Nitisinone was a moderate inhibitor of CYP2C9, and treatment may therefore result in increased plasma concentrations of comedications metabolized primarily via this enzyme. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY IDENTIFICATION: EudraCT 2016-004297-17.
PURPOSE:Nitisinone inhibits the cytochrome P450 (CYP) subfamilies CYP2C9, CYP2D6, and CYP2E1 and the organic anion transporter (OAT) isoforms OAT1 and OAT3 in vitro. Since the effect of nitisinone on these enzymes and transporters in humans is still unknown, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of nitisinone on these CYP subfamilies and OAT isoforms. METHODS: This was an open-label, nonrandomized, two-arm, phase 1 study (EudraCT: 2016-004297-17) in healthy volunteers. The substrates (tolbutamide, metoprolol, and chlorzoxazone for the respective CYPs and furosemide for the OATs) were administered as single doses, before and after 15 days of once daily dosing of 80 mg nitisinone, to determine the AUC∞ ratios ([substrate+nitisinone]/[substrate]). Nitisinone pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability were also assessed, and blood and urine were collected to determine substrate and nitisinone concentrations by LC-MS/MS. RESULTS: Thirty-six subjects were enrolled with 18 subjects included in each arm. The least square mean ratio (90% confidence interval) for AUC∞ was 2.31 (2.11-2.53) for tolbutamide, 0.95 (0.88-1.03) for metoprolol, 0.73 (0.67-0.80) for chlorzoxazone, and 1.72 (1.63-1.81) for furosemide. Clinically relevant nitisinone steady-state concentrations were reached after 12 days: mean Cav,ss of 94.08 μM. All treatments were well tolerated, and no safety concerns were identified. CONCLUSIONS:Nitisinone did not affect CYP2D6 activity, was a weak inducer of CYP2E1, and was a weak inhibitor of OAT1 and OAT3. Nitisinone was a moderate inhibitor of CYP2C9, and treatment may therefore result in increased plasma concentrations of comedications metabolized primarily via this enzyme. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY IDENTIFICATION: EudraCT 2016-004297-17.
Authors: F J van Spronsen; Y Thomasse; G P Smit; J V Leonard; P T Clayton; V Fidler; R Berger; H S Heymans Journal: Hepatology Date: 1994-11 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Birgitta Olsson; Trevor F Cox; Eftychia E Psarelli; Johan Szamosi; Andrew T Hughes; Anna M Milan; Anthony K Hall; Jozef Rovensky; Lakshminarayan R Ranganath Journal: JIMD Rep Date: 2015-03-13
Authors: G E Granero; M R Longhi; M J Mora; H E Junginger; K K Midha; V P Shah; S Stavchansky; J B Dressman; D M Barends Journal: J Pharm Sci Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 3.534
Authors: Corinne de Laet; Carlo Dionisi-Vici; James V Leonard; Patrick McKiernan; Grant Mitchell; Lidia Monti; Hélène Ogier de Baulny; Guillem Pintos-Morell; Ute Spiekerkötter Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis Date: 2013-01-11 Impact factor: 4.123
Authors: Marcos Sterkel; Lee R Haines; Aitor Casas-Sánchez; Vincent Owino Adung'a; Raquel J Vionette-Amaral; Shannon Quek; Clair Rose; Mariana Silva Dos Santos; Natalia García Escude; Hanafy M Ismail; Mark I Paine; Seth M Barribeau; Simon Wagstaff; James I MacRae; Daniel Masiga; Laith Yakob; Pedro L Oliveira; Álvaro Acosta-Serrano Journal: PLoS Biol Date: 2021-01-26 Impact factor: 8.029
Authors: Lakshminarayan R Ranganath; Anna M Milan; Andrew T Hughes; Milad Khedr; Brendan P Norman; Mohammed Alsbou; Richard Imrich; Matthew Gornall; Nicolas Sireau; James A Gallagher; Richard Jackson Journal: JIMD Rep Date: 2021-11-11
Authors: Hilde Laeremans; Charles Turner; Tommy Andersson; Jose Angel Cocho de Juan; Adam Gerrard; M Rebecca Heiner-Fokkema; Diran Herebian; Nils Janzen; Giancarlo la Marca; Mattias Rudebeck Journal: JIMD Rep Date: 2020-04-04