| Literature DB >> 30443173 |
Xiaotong Wang1,2, Yunyun Li3, Yan Mou1,4, Zhen Yue1, Haiying Zhang1, Ronggui Li1, Hongxia Sun3.
Abstract
The present study aimed to investigate the effects of ethanol extract from Brucea javanicaseed (EEBJS) on the angiogenesis of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and the possible molecular signal involved. Firstly, a Matrigel-based in vitro angiogenesis assay demonstrated that EEBJS inhibited the angiogenesis of HUVECs in a dose-dependent manner. Then by using porcine aortic endothelial cells which stably express human PDGFR-beta, we found that the inhibition of angiogenesis was mediated by PDGFR-beta. Taken together, we conclude that EEBJS inhibited the angiogenesis function of the vascular endothelial cells mediated by PDGFR-beta, and postulate that it might contribute to the therapeutic effects of EEBJS on malignant tumors.Entities:
Keywords: Angiogenesis; Ethanol Extract from Brucea javanica Seed; Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells; Malignant Tumors; Platelet Derived Growth Factor Receptor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30443173 PMCID: PMC6216067 DOI: 10.7150/ijms.28337
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Med Sci ISSN: 1449-1907 Impact factor: 3.738
Figure 1EEBJS suppressed the angiogenesis of HUVECs in dose-dependent manner. HUVECs were exposed to various concentrations of EEBJS, as indicated. The angiogenesis assay, cell staining and the values quantification for the pattern recognition, branch point and total capillary tube length are described in the Methods section. Representative microscopic fields are shown (A). Dose-dependent decreases of angiogenesis were plotted by using a nonlinear regression model (B, C and D) and the data are expressed relative to that of the control cells without exposure to EEBJS. The data are expressed as the mean±SD. N=5, and **P<0.01 versus the control cells without exposure to EEBJS. IC50 values (E) were determined based on the fitted curves.
Figure 2Dose-dependent suppression of the angiogenesis of PDGFR-beta/PAE cells after exposure to EEBJS. PDGFR-beta/PAE cells were exposed to various concentrations of EEBJS, as indicated. The angiogenesis assay and the values quantification for the pattern recognition, branch point and total capillary tube length were performed as described in method section. Representative microscopic fields are shown in A. Dose-dependent decreases of angiogenesis were plotted by using a nonlinear regression model (B, C and D). The data are expressed relative to that of the control cells without exposure to EEBJS. N=5, and **P<0.01 versus the control cells without exposure to EEBJS. IC50 values (E) were determined based on the fitted curves.