Jeffrey R Curtis1,2, Fenglong Xie3,4, Shuo Yang3,4, Maria I Danila3,4, Justin K Owensby3,4, Lang Chen3,4. 1. From the Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA. jrcurtis@uabmc.edu. 2. J.R. Curtis, MD, MS, MPH, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham; F. Xie, PhD, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham; S. Yang, MS, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham; M.I. Danila, MD, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham; J.K. Owensby, PharmD, PhD, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham; L. Chen, PhD, University of Alabama at Birmingham. jrcurtis@uabmc.edu. 3. From the Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA. 4. J.R. Curtis, MD, MS, MPH, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham; F. Xie, PhD, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham; S. Yang, MS, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham; M.I. Danila, MD, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham; J.K. Owensby, PharmD, PhD, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham; L. Chen, PhD, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The clinical utility of the multibiomarker disease activity (MBDA) test for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management in routine care in the United States has not been thoroughly studied. METHODS: Using 2011-2015 Medicare data, we linked each patient with RA to their MBDA test result. Initiation of a biologic or Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor in the 6 months following MBDA testing was described. Multivariable adjustment evaluated the likelihood of adding or switching biologic/JAK inhibitor, controlling for potential confounders. For patients with high MBDA scores who added a new RA therapy and were subsequently retested, lack of improvement in the MBDA score was evaluated as a predictor of future RA medication failure, defined by the necessity to change RA medications again. RESULTS: Among 60,596 RA patients with MBDA testing, the proportion adding or switching biologics/JAK inhibitor among those not already taking a biologic/JAK inhibitor was 9.0% (low MBDA), 11.8% (moderate MBDA), and 19.7% (high MBDA, p < 0.0001). Similarly, among those already taking biologics/JAK inhibitor, the proportions were 5.2%, 8.3%, and 13.5% (p < 0.0001). After multivariable adjustment, referent to those with low disease MBDA scores, the likelihood of switching was 1.51-fold greater (95% CI 1.35-1.69) for patients with moderate MBDA scores, and 2.62 (2.26-3.05) for patients with high MBDA scores. Among those with high MBDA scores who subsequently added a biologic/JAK inhibitor and were retested, lack of improvement in the MBDA score category was associated with likelihood of future RA treatment failure (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.27-2.03). CONCLUSION: The MBDA score was associated with both biologic and JAK inhibitor medication addition/switching and subsequent treatment outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: The clinical utility of the multibiomarker disease activity (MBDA) test for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management in routine care in the United States has not been thoroughly studied. METHODS: Using 2011-2015 Medicare data, we linked each patient with RA to their MBDA test result. Initiation of a biologic or Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor in the 6 months following MBDA testing was described. Multivariable adjustment evaluated the likelihood of adding or switching biologic/JAK inhibitor, controlling for potential confounders. For patients with high MBDA scores who added a new RA therapy and were subsequently retested, lack of improvement in the MBDA score was evaluated as a predictor of future RA medication failure, defined by the necessity to change RA medications again. RESULTS: Among 60,596 RApatients with MBDA testing, the proportion adding or switching biologics/JAK inhibitor among those not already taking a biologic/JAK inhibitor was 9.0% (low MBDA), 11.8% (moderate MBDA), and 19.7% (high MBDA, p < 0.0001). Similarly, among those already taking biologics/JAK inhibitor, the proportions were 5.2%, 8.3%, and 13.5% (p < 0.0001). After multivariable adjustment, referent to those with low diseaseMBDA scores, the likelihood of switching was 1.51-fold greater (95% CI 1.35-1.69) for patients with moderate MBDA scores, and 2.62 (2.26-3.05) for patients with high MBDA scores. Among those with high MBDA scores who subsequently added a biologic/JAK inhibitor and were retested, lack of improvement in the MBDA score category was associated with likelihood of future RA treatment failure (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.27-2.03). CONCLUSION: The MBDA score was associated with both biologic and JAK inhibitor medication addition/switching and subsequent treatment outcomes.
Authors: Zhi Yu; Bing Lu; Jenifer Agosti; Asaf Bitton; Cassandra Corrigan; Liana Fraenkel; Leslie R Harrold; Elena Losina; Jeffrey N Katz; Daniel H Solomon Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2018-04-12 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Jeffrey R Curtis; Lang Chen; Aseem Bharat; Elizabeth Delzell; Jeffrey D Greenberg; Leslie Harrold; Joel Kremer; Soko Setoguchi; Daniel H Solomon; Fenglong Xie; Huifeng Yun Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Jeffrey R Curtis; Annette H van der Helm-van Mil; Rachel Knevel; Tom W Huizinga; Douglas J Haney; Yijing Shen; Saroja Ramanujan; Guy Cavet; Michael Centola; Lyndal K Hesterberg; David Chernoff; Kerri Ford; Nancy A Shadick; Max Hamburger; Roy Fleischmann; Edward Keystone; Michael E Weinblatt Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Jonathan Kay; Olga Morgacheva; Susan P Messing; Joel M Kremer; Jeffrey D Greenberg; George W Reed; Ellen M Gravallese; Daniel E Furst Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2014-02-03 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Leslie R Harrold; George W Reed; Ani John; Christine J Barr; Kevin Soe; Robert Magner; Katherine C Saunders; Eric M Ruderman; Tmirah Haselkorn; Jeffrey D Greenberg; Allan Gibofsky; J Timothy Harrington; Joel M Kremer Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Yvonne C Lee; James Hackett; Michelle Frits; Christine K Iannaccone; Nancy A Shadick; Michael E Weinblatt; Oscar G Segurado; Eric H Sasso Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2015-11-25 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: Jeffrey R Curtis; Christopher Herrem; 'Matladi N Ndlovu; Cathy O'Brien; Yusuf Yazici Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2017-09-29 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Jeffrey R Curtis; Fenglong Xie; Cynthia S Crowson; Eric H Sasso; Elena Hitraya; Cheryl L Chin; Richard D Bamford; Rotem Ben-Shachar; Alexander Gutin; Darl D Flake; Brent Mabey; Jerry S Lanchbury Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2020-12-04 Impact factor: 5.156