Hongmin Zhang1, Wei He2, Xiaoting Wang1, Yangong Chao3, Lina Zhang4, Ran Zhu5, Wanhong Yin6, Lixia Liu7, Jun Wu8, Dawei Liu9. 1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. 2. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. 3. Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Hospital of Tsing Hua University, Beijing, China. 4. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Xiang Ya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hu Nan, China. 5. Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liao Ning, China. 6. Department of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Si Chuan University, Chengdu, China. 7. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Fourth Hospital of He Bei Medical University, China. 8. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Rui Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. 9. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. Electronic address: dwliu2015@sina.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Focused cardiac ultrasound (FCU) can provide useful information for the management of shock and acute respiratory distress syndrome. This study aimed to determine whether a 2-day focused cardiac ultrasound training course could enable critical care physicians to interpret ultrasound images in terms of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), ratio of right ventricular end-diastolic area to left ventricular end-diastolic area (R/LVEDA), and septal kinetics. DESIGN: A prospective analysis of an image test score. SETTING: Ultrasound training programs in 7 regions across China. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred forty-seven critical care physicians. INTERVENTIONS: All participants received a 2-day FCU training, including 4 sessions of basic heart function appraisal, 3 sessions of hands-on practice, and 1 session of image interpretation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The post-training total scores were considerably higher than those of pretraining (75.6% v 58.9%, respectively, p < 0.001). After the course, the trainees obtained considerably higher scores on images with LVEF <30% than on images with LVEF 30% to 54% and LVEF ≥55% (100% v 60.0% and 60.0%, respectively, p < 0.001). The trainees obtained considerably higher scores on images with R/LVEDA >1 than on images with R/LVEDA 0.6 to 1 and R/LVEDA <0.6 (90.0% v 80.0% and 80.0%, p = 0.042 and p < 0.001, respectively). The trainees obtained considerably higher scores on images with paradoxical septal movement (PSM) than on images without PSM (100% v 75.0%, respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The physicians' abilities to assess LVEF, RV enlargement, and PSM improved after the training course, and they demonstrated more accurate estimations of the most obviously abnormal images.
OBJECTIVE: Focused cardiac ultrasound (FCU) can provide useful information for the management of shock and acute respiratory distress syndrome. This study aimed to determine whether a 2-day focused cardiac ultrasound training course could enable critical care physicians to interpret ultrasound images in terms of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), ratio of right ventricular end-diastolic area to left ventricular end-diastolic area (R/LVEDA), and septal kinetics. DESIGN: A prospective analysis of an image test score. SETTING: Ultrasound training programs in 7 regions across China. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred forty-seven critical care physicians. INTERVENTIONS: All participants received a 2-day FCU training, including 4 sessions of basic heart function appraisal, 3 sessions of hands-on practice, and 1 session of image interpretation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The post-training total scores were considerably higher than those of pretraining (75.6% v 58.9%, respectively, p < 0.001). After the course, the trainees obtained considerably higher scores on images with LVEF <30% than on images with LVEF 30% to 54% and LVEF ≥55% (100% v 60.0% and 60.0%, respectively, p < 0.001). The trainees obtained considerably higher scores on images with R/LVEDA >1 than on images with R/LVEDA 0.6 to 1 and R/LVEDA <0.6 (90.0% v 80.0% and 80.0%, p = 0.042 and p < 0.001, respectively). The trainees obtained considerably higher scores on images with paradoxical septal movement (PSM) than on images without PSM (100% v 75.0%, respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The physicians' abilities to assess LVEF, RV enlargement, and PSM improved after the training course, and they demonstrated more accurate estimations of the most obviously abnormal images.
Authors: Andrew H Wu; Harshika Chowdhary; Matthew Fischer; Ali Salehi; Tristan Grogan; Louis Saddic; Jacques Neelankavil; Reed Harvey Journal: J Educ Perioper Med Date: 2022-04-01