Literature DB >> 30442277

Calculating the Expected Value of Sample Information Using Efficient Nested Monte Carlo: A Tutorial.

Anna Heath1, Gianluca Baio2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The expected value of sample information (EVSI) quantifies the economic benefit of reducing uncertainty in a health economic model by collecting additional information. This has the potential to improve the allocation of research budgets. Despite this, practical EVSI evaluations are limited partly due to the computational cost of estimating this value using the gold-standard nested simulation methods. Recently, however, Heath et al. developed an estimation procedure that reduces the number of simulations required for this gold-standard calculation. Up to this point, this new method has been presented in purely technical terms. STUDY
DESIGN: This study presents the practical application of this new method to aid its implementation. We use a worked example to illustrate the key steps of the EVSI estimation procedure before discussing its optimal implementation using a practical health economic model.
METHODS: The worked example is based on a three-parameter linear health economic model. The more realistic model evaluates the cost-effectiveness of a new chemotherapy treatment, which aims to reduce the number of side effects experienced by patients. We use a Markov model structure to evaluate the health economic profile of experiencing side effects.
RESULTS: This EVSI estimation method offers accurate estimation within a feasible computation time, seconds compared to days, even for more complex model structures. The EVSI estimation is more accurate if a greater number of nested samples are used, even for a fixed computational cost.
CONCLUSIONS: This new method reduces the computational cost of estimating the EVSI by nested simulation.
Copyright © 2018 ISPOR--The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health economic evaluations; probabilistic sensitivity analysis; sample information; trial design; value of information

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30442277     DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  6 in total

1.  Universal late pregnancy ultrasound screening to predict adverse outcomes in nulliparous women: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Gordon Cs Smith; Alexandros A Moraitis; David Wastlund; Jim G Thornton; Aris Papageorghiou; Julia Sanders; Alexander Ep Heazell; Stephen C Robson; Ulla Sovio; Peter Brocklehurst; Edward Cf Wilson
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Calculating the Expected Value of Sample Information in Practice: Considerations from 3 Case Studies.

Authors:  Anna Heath; Natalia Kunst; Christopher Jackson; Mark Strong; Fernando Alarid-Escudero; Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert; Gianluca Baio; Nicolas A Menzies; Hawre Jalal
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Probabilistic threshold analysis by pairwise stochastic approximation for decision-making under uncertainty.

Authors:  Takashi Goda; Yuki Yamada
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Calculating Expected Value of Sample Information Adjusting for Imperfect Implementation.

Authors:  Anna Heath
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 2.749

5.  Prioritizing Research in an Era of Personalized Medicine: The Potential Value of Unexplained Heterogeneity.

Authors:  Anna Heath; Petros Pechlivanoglou
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.749

6.  Computing the Expected Value of Sample Information Efficiently: Practical Guidance and Recommendations for Four Model-Based Methods.

Authors:  Natalia Kunst; Edward C F Wilson; David Glynn; Fernando Alarid-Escudero; Gianluca Baio; Alan Brennan; Michael Fairley; Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert; Chris Jackson; Hawre Jalal; Nicolas A Menzies; Mark Strong; Howard Thom; Anna Heath
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 5.725

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.