Literature DB >> 30442169

Species richness, cultural importance, and prioritization of wild spices for conservation in the Sudano-Guinean zone of Benin (West Africa).

Konoutan Médard Kafoutchoni1,2,3, Rodrigue Idohou4,5, Anthony Egeru6, Kolawolé Valère Salako4, Clément Agbangla7, Aristide Cossi Adomou5,8, Achille Ephrem Assogbadjo4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spices have always been used for their flavor-enhancement characteristics and for their medicinal properties. In Benin, scientific research on spices is scarce, despite their importance in the local population's daily needs. This study investigated the diversity of wild spices and documented the associated traditional knowledge that can be used for their valuation, domestication, and sustainable management in the Sudano-Guinean Zone of Benin.
METHODS: Data were collected during field expeditions using semi-structured interviews in ten localities across the three phytodistricts of the zone. Species richness and Shannon's diversity index were estimated using species accumulation curves. Use report (UR), cultural importance, use value (UV) index, and informant consensus factor (Fic) were used to assess traditional knowledge on wild species, their local importance, and informants' agreement among sociolinguistic groups. Priority wild spices were finally identified using an approach combining eight criteria (native status, economic value, ethnobotanical value, global distribution, national distribution, in-situ and ex-situ conservation status, legislation, and threats assessment) in four prioritization methods (point scoring procedure, point scoring procedure with weighting, compound ranking system, and binomial ranking system).
RESULTS: A total of 14 species, belonging to 12 genera and 9 families, were inventoried. The most prominent families were Zingiberaceae (21.43%), Annonaceae (21.43%), and Rutaceae (14.29%). More than 200 specific uses were reported, with the Tchabè people holding the greatest level of knowledge (70 uses; UR = 5.70 ± 0.33). The culturally most important spices differed among sociolinguistic groups. Most of the informants agree on the use of the species among (Fic = 0.72-0.98) and across the considered use categories (Fic = 0.88-0.99). The highest UV were registered for Aframomum alboviolaceum (UV = 0.93), Lippia multiflora (UV = 0.76), and Aframomum angustifolium (UV = 0.18). Overall, people perceived wild spices as declining due to agriculture, grazing, and drought. Five species, A. alboviolaceum, L. multiflora, Monodora tenuifolia, Xylopia aethiopica, and Z. zanthoxyloides, were the most prioritized for conservation.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides information relevant for the implementation of conservation and domestication actions of wild spices in Benin. Priority species could be integrated into traditional agroforestry systems (e.g., home gardens). However, for this to be effective, further research should be undertaken on morphological and genetic diversity and propagation methods of priority wild spices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accumulation curve; Biodiversity; Prioritization; Quantitative ethnobotany

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30442169      PMCID: PMC6238395          DOI: 10.1186/s13002-018-0267-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed        ISSN: 1746-4269            Impact factor:   2.733


Background

Biodiversity provides goods and services that sustain human life [1]. Yet, biodiversity is declining at unprecedented rate, which has adverse effects on human wellbeing. The quest to maintain the provisioning power of biodiversity has led to the development of multilateral environmental agreements (such as the Convention on Biological Diversity) and to increasing conservation efforts at country level aimed at slowing depletion [2]. In Benin, attention has been dedicated to the conservation of biological diversity and sustainable use of natural resources [3, 4]. So far, non-timber forest products (NTFPs) are among the most studied groups. Rural households in sub-Saharan Africa do rely on them for subsistence and trade [5]. The NTFPs are important in ensuring food security, meeting medicinal needs, and providing sources of income [6], especially in periods of drought and starvation [7]. However, owing to a changing climate [8] and anthropogenic activities such as agriculture, deforestation, overexploitation, bush fires, and livestock grazing, the NTFPs are threatened by dramatic habitat loss and changing ecologies [9]. Non-timber forest products include different taxonomic and functional groups including wild spices. A spice is “any dried, fragrant, aromatic and pungent edible vegetable or plant substance, in the whole, broken or ground form, which contributes flavor; whose primary function in food is seasoning rather than nutritional, and which may contribute relish or piquancy to foods or beverages, that is true to name and from which no portion of any volatile oil or other flavoring principle has been removed, or to which no additive or spent spice has been added” [10], except for onions, garlic, and celery [11]. Spices have long been valued for their flavor-enhancement characteristics and their medicinal properties [12]. They have proven effective in the treatment of various ailments including cough, fever, paralysis, infertility, urinary disorder, tooth ache, snakebite, menstrual disorder, and diabetes among others [13, 14]. They are also important in reducing the incidence of chronic diseases [12]. Many wild spices are rich in various bioactive compounds including alkaloids, polyphenols, flavonoids, steroids, and essential oils, which confer pharmacological potential to them. Some species are rich in key nutrients such as phosphorus, iron, calcium, and magnesium, and constitute a qualitative nutritional source for the local communities [15]. However, since several wild species are under threats of extinction, any action targeting their domestication and sustainable management is welcome. Sustainable management of wild spices requires their documentation. This is a fundamental first step that helps in revealing the resource base for their better management. The relationship between plant species and their use by local communities is recognized as a central question in conservation science [16]. As such, understanding the determinants of the use of plants by rural communities has become a major concern in ethnobotanical studies [17, 18]. Traditional knowledge can help to clearly understand the different uses and processes developed by local communities over generations and is capital for the valuation of plant species [19]. Therefore, documenting the knowledge of local populations on wild spices is crucial as this information can help in the efficient valuation of these resources at a local level while considering different cultures across the study area. Since financial resources for conservation activities are often limited, it is important to establish priority species to be conserved [20]. This allows conservationists to know which taxa should be primarily targeted for conservation—those that are not priority and those for which there is insufficient information to know whether or not they are priority for conservation [21]. Prioritization of wild spices is thus essential for their active conservation as it will help optimal use of available resources. The main objective of this study was to assess the diversity of wild spices and document the associated traditional knowledge that can be used for their valuation, domestication, and sustainable management in the Sudano-Guinean zone of Benin. Specifically, the study (i) assessed the diversity of the wild spices, (ii) assessed the traditional knowledge pertaining to the species, and (iii) documented priority species deserving urgent conservation measures in the Sudano-Guinean zone of Benin.

Material and methods

Study area

The study was conducted in the Sudano-Guinean zone (SGZ) of Benin (Fig. 1). The area lies between 7° 30′ and 9° 45′ N and extends from the district of Dassa to the district of Bembèrèkè. The rainfall regime is bimodal with a tendency to unimodal. The mean annual rainfall varies from 1100 to 1300 mm [22]. The relative humidity varies between 31 and 98% while the annual temperature ranges from 25 to 29 °C [23]. The zone is subdivided into three phytogeographical districts: Bassila, Zou, and South-Borgou. The phytodistrict of Bassila covers 9% of the national territory and is characterized by an annual rainfall of between 1200 and 1300 mm [24]. The soils are ferrallitic with concretions and breastplates. The vegetation is characterized by semi-deciduous forest, woodland, and riparian forest. The species richness of this phytodistrict is estimated to be 450 species with several rare plants of immense importance [25]. The phytodistrict of Zou occupies 9% of the national territory with rainfall of between 1100 and 1200 mm and ferruginous soils on crystalline rocks [24]. It is characterized by dry forest, woodland, and riparian forest which arbor a total of 350 species [25]. The phytodistrict of South-Borgou covers 22% of the country and has a unimodal rainfall averaging 1200 mm [24]. South-Borgou has ferruginous soils on crystalline rocks and its vegetation is characterized by dry forest, woodland, and riparian forest with 340 plant species [4]. The main sociolinguistic groups occupying the area are Fè, Fon, Idatcha, Mahi, Tchabè, Nago, Bariba, Anii, and Lokpa [26, 27]. The main activities of those groups are extensive agriculture, animal husbandry, and uncontrolled exploitation of woodlands and gallery forests [28].
Fig. 1

Map of the study area showing phytodistricts and surveyed villages

Map of the study area showing phytodistricts and surveyed villages

Sampling

The presence of wild spices across Benin was reported by Akoègninou et al. [29]. A brief preliminary survey was undertaken in November 2015 throughout ten localities randomly selected in the study area. Uses by diversity of sociolinguistic group and the effective presence of wild spices was used as the main criteria in selecting localities in each phytodistrict. Random selection was used after selecting localities that met these criteria. In each locality, 30 informants [30] were asked if they knew or made use of at least one wild spice in their household. The proportion p of positive answers was used to compute the sample size n for each locality using the normal approximation of the binomial distribution [30]:with: U1  the value of the normal random variable corresponding to a probability value of 1 − α/2. For a probability value of 0.975 (or α = 0.05), U1  = 1.96 d the margin error of the estimation of any parameter to be computed from the survey and was fixed at 0.08 From the formula above, the number of informants randomly considered throughout the study area (all localities considered) was 218 informants including 108 women (Table 1). Ethnobotanical surveys were carried out during 6 months from March to August 2016.
Table 1

Sample size by locality, sociolinguistic group, phytodistrict and gender

Country districtLocalitySGSample size (locality)PDSample size (PD)
WMTotalWMTotal
AplahouéBadjamèAdja91120Zou514697
DjidjaSovlègniFon181937
DassaFitaIdatcha13720
SavèAkonTchabè11920
OuessèIkèmonNago91120South Borgou312960
OuessèGbanlinMahi101020
OuessèIdadjoNago12820
BantèBanonItcha61521Bassila263561
SavalouObi-CoroIfè81220
BassilaManigriTchabè12820
Total108110218108110218

SG sociolinguistic group, W women, M men, PD phytodistrict

Sample size by locality, sociolinguistic group, phytodistrict and gender SG sociolinguistic group, W women, M men, PD phytodistrict

Data collection

Data were collected through field exploration and individual semi-structured interviews using questionnaire. The questionnaire was twofold: the first part assessed sociodemographic characteristics of informants (name, sex, age, sociolinguistic group, and main activity) while the second part was concerned with their knowledge on wild spices. Each informant was asked to list, using his local name, the wild spices that he (or she) knew and/or used. For each species, data on the meaning of the name, the category of use (food, medicinal, ceremony, cultural, other), the plant parts used, the description of uses, the main habitats where the species is encountered, the local perception of its population dynamic over time (declining, stable, or increasing), the perception of the nutritional value of the species, and its economic value (low, average and high) were gathered during the surveys. Interviews were recorded and conducted entirely in the local language of the informants, with the help of a translator when and where necessary. Individual semi-structured questionnaire interviews were followed by direct observations on the field (home garden, field, fallow, savanna, or forest) accompanied by key informants to observe the species in their natural habitat or in cultivation while minimizing the risks of erroneous identifications. The species were photographed, collected, and pressed for identification in the herbarium [31]. Literature was used to collect data regarding the species origin, its global and national distribution, its conservation status (in situ and ex situ), existence of legislation, and threat assessment, for prioritization purpose. Scientific articles, the flora of Benin [29], the Biodiversity Atlas for West Africa [25], the IUCN online database [32], the Red list of threatened plant species in Benin [4], and the online database of the Plant Resources of Tropical Africa [33] were used as complementary sources of data.

Data analysis

Collected specimens were identified at species taxonomic level and their life form checked using the illustrated reference book of Arbonnier [34], the Analytic Flora of Benin [29], and the expertise of a specialist of the National Herbarium of Benin. The chorological type of each species was determined following White [35]. Relative frequencies were computed by species, botanical family, life form, and chorological type in order to generate tables and bar plots at levels of phytodistricts and sociolinguistic groups. To estimate wild spices richness, species compositions as listed by respondents were translated into a presence-absence matrix by phytodistrict and species accumulation curve was generated based on the first-order Jackknife method and 100 permutations, using EstimateS version 9.1.0 software for Macintosh [36]. The first-order Jackknife is a non-parametric incidence-based estimator that gives an accurate approximation of species richness [37]. Diversity of wild spices in each phytodistrict was assessed using Shannon’s diversity index computed in EstimateS also using the species accumulation curve. To compare the estimated wild spices richness and diversity among phytodistricts, Kruskal-Wallis test was applied since assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance were violated [38]. In addition, the Dunn post hoc test was performed. The Dunn post hoc test is appropriate for groups with unequal sizes [39]. Differences in wild spices composition among phytodistricts as cited by respondents were tested using analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) [40]. ANOSIM was based on Jaccard’s dissimilarity distance using 1000 permutations. To describe probable relationship between the species and their habitats as locally mentioned, a correspondence analysis (CA) was performed on the contingency table with species in rows and habitats in columns. Traditional knowledge was assessed through calculation of the use report (UR) [41] which is the number of uses reported by a given informant. Since the UR values were not over-dispersed, a generalized linear model (GLM) with Poisson error distribution was applied to assess their variation according to phytodistrict, sociolinguistic group, gender, age category, main activity, and education level. The model that best fits with the data was selected by combining Akaike information criteria (AIC) and Bayesian information criteria (BIC). To assess the homogeneity in the information provided by the respondents, the informant consensus factor (Fic) was calculated for each use category and across use categories, using the following formula [42]: Where: Fic = informant consensus factor nur = number of use reports from informants for a particular plant use category nt = number of taxa that are used for that plant use category for all informants. Fic values range between 0 and 1. Values close to 0 indicate that the plants are chosen randomly in the use category, or the informants do not exchange information about their use. High Fic values (near 1) indicate that the plants are chosen based on a well-defined criterion in the community and/or the information is shared among informants [43]. Cultural importance of the wild spices was assessed using the cultural importance value from both individual informant and community perspectives as in Paniagua Zambrana et al. [44]. The cultural importance value from individual informant perspective was calculated as follow [41]:where: URui = total number of informants reporting a species within a particular use category NC = total number of use categories N = total number of informants. Community cultural importance was calculated for each species following Paniagua Zambrana et al. [44] as the sum across all use categories of the number of communities reporting the species divided by the total number of communities surveyed. To assess the importance of each wild spice, the use value (UV) index modified by Rossato et al. [45] from Phillips and Gentry [46] as follow:where: UV = use value of a species U = number of quotations per species n = number of informants. For defining priority wild spices for conservation, the approach proposed by Magos Brehm et al. [21] and recently applied by Idohou et al. [47] to the Crop wild relatives in Benin was used. Eight criteria were used: (i) native status, (ii) economic value, (iii) ethnobotanical value, (iv) global distribution, (v) national distribution, (vi) in-situ and ex-situ conservation status, (vii) legislation, and (viii) threats assessment (IUCN redlist). The method consisted in combining four different prioritization setting methods that used the aforementioned criteria: Point Scoring Procedure (PSP), Point Scoring Procedure with Weighting (PSPW), Compound Ranking System (CRS), and Binomial Ranking System (BRS). In PSP, the inventoried species were given a series of scores for each criterion (Table 2). Then, the overall score was obtained for each wild spice by adding the scores of individual criteria. Species with a greater value have higher conservation needs. PSWP is comparable to PSP, except that here a specific weight was assigned to each criterion (Table 2). The CRS method is based on the individual criterion ranking positions, which were combined to obtain a compound rank for each species (Table 3). BRS uses a series of questions with binomial answers (i.e., “yes” or “no”). The yes answer (1) was always given more priority than the no (0). A sub-list of eight priority wild spices was established for each method. The number of times that the same species appeared on each sub-list was marked, and each species was given an overall score. The five species that have received the greater overall scores were given higher priority. In the case where many species had the same overall score, cultural importance and socio-economic considerations were used to separate the species.
Table 2

Score attribution in the point scoring procedure (PSP) and point scoring procedure with weighting (PSPW) (adapted from Magos Brehm et al. [21])

CriteriaEvaluation criteriaScore attribution (PSP)PSPW weight (%)
Species origin(a) Native, (b) exotic, (c) doubtfully native, (d) no data(a) 4; (b) 3; (c) 2; (d) 115
Economic value(a) high, (b) average, (c) Low, (d) no data(a) 4; (b) 3; (c) 2; (d) 110
Ethnobotanical value(a) 19–21; (b) 16–18; (c) 13–15; (d) 10–12; (e) 7–9; (f) 4–6; (g) 1–3; (h) No known uses(a) 7; (b) 6; (c) 5; (d) 4; (e) 3; (f) 2; (g) 1; (h) 020
Global distribution(a) WA, (b) WA + 1 region, (c) WA + 2 regions, (d) WA + 3 regions, (e) Africa, (f) worldwide, (g) no data(a) 6; (b) 5; (c) 4; (d) 3; (e) 2; (f) 1; (g) 015
National distribution(a) 1; (b) 2; (c) 3; (d) 4; (e) 5; (f) 6; (g) 7; (h) 8; (i) 9; (j) 10; (k) no data(a) 10; (b) 9; (c) 8; (d) 7; (e) 6; (f) 5; (g) 4; (h) 3; (i) 2; (j) 1; (k) 07.5
Conservation status(a) In situ, (b) ex-situ, (c) other, (d) no data(a) 4; (b) 3; (c) 2; (d) 110
Legislation(a) international, (b) national, (c) locale, (d) no data(a) 4; (b) 3; (c) 2; (d) 17.5
Threatened status(a) CR, (b) EN, (c) VU, (d) NT, (e) LC, (f) DD, (g) NE(a) 7; (b) 6; (c) 5; (d) 4; (e) 3; (f) 2; (g) 115

WA West Africa, CR critically endangered, EN endangered, VU vulnerable, NT near threatened, LC least concern, DD data deficient, NE not evaluated

Table 3

Rank attribution in the compound ranking system (CRS) method (adapted from Magos Brehm et al. [21])

CriteriaRank of sub-criteria
R1R2R3R4R5R6R7R8R9R10R11
Species originNativeExoticDoubtfully nativeNo data
Economic valueHighAverageLowNo data
Ethnobotanical value201918171615141312No data
Global distributionWAWA + 1 regionWA + 2 regionsWA + 3 regionsAfricaWorldNo data
National distribution12245678910No data
Conservation statusin situex situOtherNo data
LegislationInternationalNationalLocalNo data
Threatened statusCRENVUNTLCDDNE

WA West Africa, CR critically endangered, EN endangered, VU vulnerable, NT near threatened, LC least concern, DD data deficient, NE not evaluated

Score attribution in the point scoring procedure (PSP) and point scoring procedure with weighting (PSPW) (adapted from Magos Brehm et al. [21]) WA West Africa, CR critically endangered, EN endangered, VU vulnerable, NT near threatened, LC least concern, DD data deficient, NE not evaluated Rank attribution in the compound ranking system (CRS) method (adapted from Magos Brehm et al. [21]) WA West Africa, CR critically endangered, EN endangered, VU vulnerable, NT near threatened, LC least concern, DD data deficient, NE not evaluated All analyses were conducted in the statistical software R 3.4.1 [48]. The Dunn hoc test was performed using the package FSA [49], the ANOSIM analysis in the vegan package [50], and the correspondence analysis in the package FactomineR [51].

Results

Diversity and richness of wild spices

Estimation of wild spices richness indicated 14 species in the Sudanian zone (CI 13.83–14.32) belonging to 9 families and 12 genera (Table 4). The three most important families were Zingiberaceae (3 species), Annonaceae (3 species), and Rutaceae (2 species). The remaining 6 families (Lamiaceae, Poaceae, Verbenaceae, Piperaceae, Polygonaceae, and Balanophoraceae) were represented by only one species each. The species were composed of herbs (42.86%), shrubs (28.37%), trees (21.43%), and liana (7.14%).
Table 4

General characteristics of the wild spices inventoried

SpeciesFamilyVernacular name (sociolinguistic group)LFPTHabitatPUPAUse categoriesLF
1Aeollanthus pubescens Benth.LamiaceaeFé okuta, Kpon’kouta (Tchabè)HS7lf, fw, wpRSfoo, medH
2Aframomum alboviolaceum (Ridley) K.Schum.ZingiberaceaeGbétakin (Fon); Koutchou (Adja); Atalè okou, Ibouro (Idatcha); Ebouro, Ibio, Bobota (Ifè, Tchabè); Okpogloé (Mahi); Ebo (Itcha)HAT3, 4, 5, 6lf, rt., st, fr, sdDSfoo, med, fod, othH
3Aframomum angustifolium (Sonn.) K.Schum.ZingiberaceaeTchankoko (Ifè, Tchabè)HGC3, 4, 6lf, rt., st, frRSfoo, med, cult, othH
4Aframomum melegueta (Roscoe) K.Schum.ZingiberaceaeTakù (Adja)HGC5, 6lf, rt., sdNAmed, cultH
5Clausena anisata (WilId.) Hook.f. ex Benth.RutaceaeAzizinma, Gbozohouin, Tchakatouma (Fon); Ewé kikani (Idatcha)ShSG3, 7lf, rtRSmed, cultS
6Cymbopogon giganteus (Hochst.) Chiov.PoaceaeOflin (Idatcha); gbézin (Fon)HAT3, 7lfASfoo, med, fodH
7Lippia multiflora MoldenkeVerbenaceaeNyenya, aglàla (Fon, Mahi); Aglàla, Aklala sê (Mahi); Kanhoun (Idatcha); Tchagara (Ifè); Tchagà (Itcha); Kinhoun kinhoun, Kanhoun kanhoun (Tchabè)ShS1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7lf, fw, st, rt., wpASfoo, med, cultS
8Monodora tenuifolia Benth.AnnonaceaeAriwo (Idatcha)TGC7rt, bk, sdRSfoo, med, cultT
9Piper guineense Schumach. & Thonn.PiperaceaeKanlin man, lènlènkoun (Adja)LAT4, 5lf, fr, st, rtASfoo, med, cultL
10Securidaca longipedunculata Fresen.PolygonaceaeAttakpa wanon, Attakpa wanhuin huin, Kpatalè (Fon, Idatcha)ShAT3, 4, 7rt, bkASmedS
11Thonningia sanguinea VahlBalanophoraceaeAtin madodè (Idatcha); Otchoulélé (Ifè)HAT3, 4, 6rtRSmedH
12Uvaria chamae P.Beauv.AnnonaceaeYaha (Idatcha); Yalaha (Fon)ShSGC3, 4, 7lf, fr, rtASfoo, medS
13Xylopia aethiopica (Dunal) A.Rich.AnnonaceaeEsso (Adja)TAT5frASmed, cultT
14Zanthoxylum zanthoxyloides (Lam.) Zepernick & TimlerRutaceaeTchanouwèlè (Itcha); Sanouyèlè (Tchabè)TSG1, 2, 3, 4rtASfoo, medT

LF life form, PT phytogeographical type, PA period of availability, H herb, L liana, Sh shrub, T tree, AT afrotropical, GC Guineo-Congolian, S Sudanian, SG Sudano-Guinean, SGC Sudano-Guineo-Congolian, lf leaf, fw flower, wp whole plant, rt. root, st stem, sd seed, fr fruit, bk bark, cer ceremony, med medicine, foo food, cult cultural, oth other, DS dry season, AS all season, RS rainy season, 1 home garden, 2 field, 3 savanna, 4 natural forest, 5 sacred forest, 6 wetland, 7 hill

General characteristics of the wild spices inventoried LF life form, PT phytogeographical type, PA period of availability, H herb, L liana, Sh shrub, T tree, AT afrotropical, GC Guineo-Congolian, S Sudanian, SG Sudano-Guinean, SGC Sudano-Guineo-Congolian, lf leaf, fw flower, wp whole plant, rt. root, st stem, sd seed, fr fruit, bk bark, cer ceremony, med medicine, foo food, cult cultural, oth other, DS dry season, AS all season, RS rainy season, 1 home garden, 2 field, 3 savanna, 4 natural forest, 5 sacred forest, 6 wetland, 7 hill Estimation of species richness by phytodistrict revealed 11 species (CI 10.78–11.54) belonging to 8 families in Zou, 5 species (CI 4.94–5.01) belonging to 4 families in Bassila, and 4 species (CI 3.93–4.05) belonging to 4 families in South-Borgou (Fig. 2). The first-order Jackknife estimator overestimated wild spices richness as the sampling started and then decreased slightly with increasing sample size (Fig. 3a). Comparison of estimated richness among phytodistricts indicated that wild spices richness was significantly higher in Zou than in Bassila and South-Borgou respectively (Fig. 3a; p < 0.001). Similarly, the Shannon diversity index was significantly higher in Zou (1.58) than Bassila (1.43) and South-Borgou (1.22) respectively (Fig. 3b; p < 0.001). Therefore, the phytodistrict of Zou was the richest and most diversified in terms of used wild spices.
Fig. 2

Wild spices encountered in the Sudano-Guinean zone of Benin. a Bassila. b South-Borgou. c Zou phytodistricts

Fig. 3

Estimated species richness (a) and Shannon’s diversity (b) for the species based on incidence data

Wild spices encountered in the Sudano-Guinean zone of Benin. a Bassila. b South-Borgou. c Zou phytodistricts Estimated species richness (a) and Shannon’s diversity (b) for the species based on incidence data There were significant differences in the composition of wild spices used by respondents among phytodistricts (ANOSIM; R = 0.123, p = 0.001). Coefficient of similarity between Zou and South-Borgou (0.15, p = 0.003) and the one between Zou and Bassila (0.23, p ≤ 0.001) were low. This reveals that the people in the phytodistricts of Zou knew and used wild spices differently from those of the people from South-Borgou and Bassila respectively. Conversely, the coefficient of similarity between Bassila and South-Borgou was 0.50 (p ≤ 0.001), indicating that half of the species mentioned as wild spices by people from Bassila were also known by informants from South-Borgou, and vice-versa. The distribution of the spices according to their chorological type showed the predominance of Afrotropical (42.86%) and Guineo-Congolian (21.43%) species whereas Sudanian (14.29%), Sudano-Guinean (14.29%), and Sudano-Guinean (7.13%) elements were poorly represented (Table 4). Vernacular names were diverse and varied according to the species but also among areas as well as within the same sociolinguistic area (Table 4). Indeed, 42 vernacular names were recorded for the 14 investigated wild spices. The analysis of the meanings of vernacular names in each dialect (Table 5) revealed that the wild spices were named essentially based on their morphological traits, habitats, taste, habits, smell, or origin. However, for some species, the meanings of the vernacular names were unknown to local people. Occasionally, different sociolinguistic groups, often occupying the same geographical area share the same vernacular names for a given species. Pictures of selected wild spices are presented in Figs. 4 and 5.
Table 5

List of vernacular names recorded per species and their meaning

SpeciesVernacular namesSociolinguistic groupsMeaning of the vernacular names
Aeollanthus pubescens Fé okuta, Kpon’koutaTchabèGrow on the hills
Aframomum alboviolaceum GbétakinFonBush pepper
GbétakounFonAframomum melegueta of the bush
KoutchouAdja
Atalè okouIdatchaBush pepper
Ibouro
EbouroIfèRed fruit
IbioNagoRed fruit
BobotaTchabèRed fruit emerging from the ground
Pungent seeds like A. melegueta’s ones
OkpogloéMahiFruits emerging from the ground
EboItchaRed fruit
Aframomum angustifolium TchankokoIfè, Nago Tchabè,
Sankoko
Aframomum melegueta TakùAdja
Clausena anisata AzizinmaFonRepel the ants
TchakatoumaFonLeaves used for making magic to counter tchakatou dark magic
GbozohouinFon
Ewé kikaniIdatcha
Cymbopogon giganteus OflinIdatcha
GbézinFon
Lippia multiflora NyenyaFon
AglàlaFon, Mahi
Aklala sêMahiPlant with aromatic flower introduced from Accra (Ghana)
KanhounIdatcha
TchagaraIfèMint flavor
TchagàItcha
Kinhoun kinhounNagoPleasant flavor
Kanhoun kanhounTchabèPleasant flavor
Monodora tenuifolia AriwoIdatcha
Piper guineense Kanlin manAdjaLiana habit
lènlènkounAdja
Securidaca longipedunculata Attakpa wanon, Attakpa wanhuin huinFonPersistent scent of the root’s bark
KpatalèIdatcha
Thonningia sanguinea Atin madodèIdatchaLeafless plant
OtchouléléIfèThe flowers appear with the new moon
Uvaria chamae YahaIdatcha
YalahaFon
Xylopia aethiopica EssoAdja
Zanthoxylum zanthoxyloides TchanouwèlèItchaPungent taste and pleasant flavor
SanouyèlèTchabèPungent taste and pleasant flavor
Fig. 4

Pictures of selected wild spices in the Sudano-Guinean zone of Benin. a Leaves and b fruit of Aframomum alboviolaceum. c Leaves, d flower, and e fruit of Aframomum angustifolium. f Leaves and flowers of Lippia multiflora. g Tree Monodora tenuifolia. h Flower of Thonningia sanguinea. i Leaves and unripe fruits of Zanthoxylum zanthoxyloides. j Leaves of Clausena anisata

Fig. 5

Pictures of selected wild spices in the Sudano-Guinean zone of Benin. a Flower of Uvaria chamae. b Leaves and c fruits of Securidaca longipedunculata

List of vernacular names recorded per species and their meaning Pictures of selected wild spices in the Sudano-Guinean zone of Benin. a Leaves and b fruit of Aframomum alboviolaceum. c Leaves, d flower, and e fruit of Aframomum angustifolium. f Leaves and flowers of Lippia multiflora. g Tree Monodora tenuifolia. h Flower of Thonningia sanguinea. i Leaves and unripe fruits of Zanthoxylum zanthoxyloides. j Leaves of Clausena anisata Pictures of selected wild spices in the Sudano-Guinean zone of Benin. a Flower of Uvaria chamae. b Leaves and c fruits of Securidaca longipedunculata

Local perception on the distributional pattern of species across habitat types

Result of the CA performed on the wild spices and their habitats (with 82.62% of the observed variation saved on the first two axes) indicated that Xylopia aethiopica (Dunal) A.Rich., Piper guineense Schumach. & Thonn., and Aframomum melegueta (Roscoe) K.Schum. were mainly reported as occurring in sacred groves while Zanthoxylum zanthoxyloides (Lam.) Zepernick & Timler, Lippia multiflora Moldenke, Aframomum angustifolium (Sonn.) K.Schum., Aframomum alboviolaceum (Ridley) K.Schum., Thonningia sanguinea Vahl, and Uvaria chamae P.Beauv. were reported to mainly occur in savanna, home gardens, fields, natural forests, or wetlands (axis 1; Fig. 6). Aeollanthus pubescens Benth., Monodora tenuifolia Benth., Clausena anisata (Willd.) Hook.f. ex Benth., Securidaca longipedunculata Fresen., and Cymbopogon giganteus (Hochst.) Chiov. were reported as occurring on rocky soils and hills (axis 2; Fig. 6).
Fig. 6

Projection of the species and types of habitat in the correspondence analysis axes systems

Projection of the species and types of habitat in the correspondence analysis axes systems

Traditional knowledge and cultural importance of the wild spices

Traditional knowledge (TK) on the wild spices

Traditional knowledge (TK) on wild spices varied (p < 0.05) according to phytodistricts, sociolinguistic groups and gender. No variation (p > 0.05) of TK was observed with respect to age category, main activity, or education level. Informants reported the same number of uses of wild spices in both Bassila (UR = 4.59 ± 0.22) and South-Borgou (UR = 4.05 ± 0.17) phytodistricts while less uses were reported in Zou phytodistrict (UR = 3.13 ± 0.18). As regards variation according to the gender, men reported more uses than women (UR = 4.09 ± 0.18 and UR = 3.46 ± 0.14 respectively). For sociolinguistic group variation, Tchabè in Bassila held the highest level of traditional knowledge (UR = 5.70 ± 0.33) followed by Itcha (UR = 4.38 ± 0.40) and Ifè (UR = 3.70 ± 0.24) sociolinguistic groups respectively. In South-Borgou phytodistrict, the Nago reported more uses (UR = 4.13 ± 0.23) than the Mahi people (UR = 3.75 ± 0.19). In Zou phytodistrict, the Idatcha reported more uses (UR = 4.62 ± 0.59) than the other groups. The number of use reports was similarly low for the Adja, Fon, and Tchabè sociolinguistic groups (UR values of 3.04 ± 0.40, 2.69 ± 0.29, and 3.06 ± 0.21 respectively).

Informants consensus factors (Fic) among and across use categories

Overall, a great consistency was observed among the informants regarding the uses of the wild spices, with Fic values varying from 0.72 to 0.98 (Table 6). Food use category had the highest Fic value 0.98 with 434 use reports for 10 plant species. The species responsible for this high value were Aframomum alboviolaceum and Lippia multiflora with 201 (24.78%) and 151 (18.62%) reported uses respectively. This category of use was followed by medicine (Fic = 0.96; 304 use reports, 14 species), culture (Fic = 0.95; 21 use reports, 2 species), and other uses (Fic = 0.84; 26 use reports, 5 species). Other uses included food wrapping, fodder, rope for binding luggage in the field, and whip for punishing children. Similarly, the species responsible of the high number of reported uses within medicinal category were L. multiflora with 137 out of the 304 medicinal use reports (45.07%) and A. alboviolaceum with 57 use reports (18.75%). The least agreement between informants (Fic = 0.72; 26 use reports, 8 species) was found for wild spices used for ceremony (Table 6). As regards the informants’ consensus across the use categories, high degree of agreement (Fic ranged from 0.97 to 0.99) was observed across the phytodistricts (Table 7). A similar trend was found between gender with Fic = 0.97 for both women and men. As for the sociolinguistic groups, the highest agreement (Fic = 0.98) among information given by the informants was found for Nago and Tchabè people from Zou phytodistrict (Table 7). The least agreement (Fic = 0.88) was found for Idatcha sociolinguistic group.
Table 6

Informant consensus factor (Fic) by use category

Use categories n ur % ur n t % taxa F ic #
Food43453.451071.430.98
Medicine30437.4414100.000.96
Cultural212.59214.290.95
Ceremony263.20857.140.72
Other uses263.20535.710.84
Total81199.8814*100.00*

n number of use report, ur use report, n number of taxa, F informant consensus factor

*A taxon may be listed in many of the categories of use

#A high Fic value indicates a high level of agreement among the informants regarding wild spices used for the corresponding use category; a low value indicates a low degree of agreement

Table 7

Informant consensus factor (Fic) across use categories

nur*% ur N n t % taxa F ic #
Phytodistrict
 Bassila28034.5761535.710.99
 South-Borgou23929.5160428.570.99
 Zou29135.93971178.570.97
Sex
 Men47859.01110141000.97
 Women33240.991081285.710.97
Sociolinguistic group
 Adja708.6420428.570.96
 Fon9411.637857.140.92
 Idatcha607.4120857.140.88
 Ifè749.1420428.570.96
 Itcha9211.3621428.570.97
 Mahi9011.1120428.570.97
 Nago16119.8840428.570.98
 Tchabè 1556.7920214.290.98
 Tchabè 211414.0720428.570.97

n number of use report, ur use report, N number of informants, n number of taxa, F informant consensus factor

*A taxon may be listed in several categories of use

#A high Fic value indicates a high level of agreement among the informants regarding wild spices used for the corresponding use category; a low value indicates a low degree of agreement

Informant consensus factor (Fic) by use category n number of use report, ur use report, n number of taxa, F informant consensus factor *A taxon may be listed in many of the categories of use #A high Fic value indicates a high level of agreement among the informants regarding wild spices used for the corresponding use category; a low value indicates a low degree of agreement Informant consensus factor (Fic) across use categories n number of use report, ur use report, N number of informants, n number of taxa, F informant consensus factor *A taxon may be listed in several categories of use #A high Fic value indicates a high level of agreement among the informants regarding wild spices used for the corresponding use category; a low value indicates a low degree of agreement

Cultural importance (CI) of the wild spices

Based on the cultural importance index at informant level, the most culturally important wild spices in Bassila phytodistrict were L. multiflora (CI = 1.67), A. alboviolaceum (CI = 1.38), Z. zanthoxyloides (CI = 0.85), and A. angustifolium (CI = 0.51). In South-Borgou, L. multiflora (CI = 2.07) and A. alboviolaceum (CI = 1.30) were identified whereas A. alboviolaceum (CI = 1.22) and L. multiflora (CI = 0.87) were identified for Zou phytodistrict (Fig. 7). Therefore, people valued almost the same wild spices in all the Sudano-Guinean zone except in Bassila where two species (Z. zanthoxyloides and A. angustifolium) were valued in addition. The most relevant categories of use were food followed by medicine for the three phytodistricts (Table 8).
Fig. 7

Radar plot of total CI value for each wild spice according to the phytodistrict

Table 8

Cultural importance index (CI, informant based) of wild spice use categories by phytodistrict

Use category*Phytodistrict
BassilaSouth-BorgouZou
Food0.520.520.14
Medicine0.370.350.10
Cultural0.000.090.00
Ceremony0.010.000.02
Other use0.020.040.01
Total CI0.921.000.27

*Average number of wild spices inventoried in each phytodistrict: 5 in Bassila, 4 in South-Borgou, and 11 in Zou

Radar plot of total CI value for each wild spice according to the phytodistrict Cultural importance index (CI, informant based) of wild spice use categories by phytodistrict *Average number of wild spices inventoried in each phytodistrict: 5 in Bassila, 4 in South-Borgou, and 11 in Zou L. multiflora was the common most culturally important wild spice for Mahi (CI = 3.20), Tchabè from both Bassila (CI = 1.90) and Zou (CI = 1.50) phytodistricts, Nago (CI = 1.66), Itcha (CI = 1.57), Ifè (CI = 1.55), and Idatcha (CI = 0.95) sociolinguistic groups, while it had relatively less importance for Fon (CI = 0.78) and absolutely no importance for Adja. Similarly, A. alboviolaceum was highly valued by all sociolinguistic groups. Z. zanthoxyloides was most importantly valued by Tchabè from Bassila phytodistrict (CI = 1.90) and lesser by Itcha (CI = 0.66). P. guineense and A. melegueta were valued only by Adja (CI = 1.10 and 0.80 respectively), whereas M. tenuifolia had cultural importance only for Idatcha (CI = 0.50), and A. angustifolium for Itcha (CI = 0.81) and Tchabè informants from Bassila phytodistrict (CI = 0.60; Table 9).
Table 9

Cultural importance index (informant based) of each species according to the different sociolinguistic groups

SpeciesSociolinguistic group
AdjaFonIdatchaIfèItchaMahiNagoTchabè1Tchabè2
Aeollanthus pubescens 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.680.000.00
Aframomum alboviolaceum 1.101.350.851.501.331.201.471.251.30
Aframomum angustifolium 0.000.000.000.100.810.000.290.000.60
Aframomum melegueta 0.800.060.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Clausena anisata 0.000.060.100.000.000.000.000.000.00
Cymbopogon giganteus 0.000.000.250.000.000.000.000.000.00
Lippia multiflora 0.000.780.951.551.573.201.661.501.90
Monodora tenuifolia 0.000.000.500.000.000.000.000.000.00
Piper guineense 1.100.160.000.000.000.100.000.000.00
Securidaca longipedunculata 0.000.030.250.000.000.000.000.000.00
Thonningia sanguinea 0.000.030.050.550.000.000.000.000.00
Uvaria chamae 0.000.080.100.000.000.000.000.000.00
Xylopia aethiopica 0.500.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Zanthoxylum zanthoxyloides 0.000.000.000.000.660.000.000.001.90
Cultural importance index (informant based) of each species according to the different sociolinguistic groups Figure 8 shows that all the sociolinguistic groups valued food and medicinal uses for the wild spices. In addition, Mahi people also made cultural use of spices (CI = 0.25) while Adja used them for ceremony (CI = 0.19) and Ifè used them for other purposes (CI = 0.09). Overall, wild spices were used for other purposes much less frequently. The most culturally important wild spices for both women and men were L. multiflora (CI = 1.41 and 1.44 for women and men respectively) and A. alboviolaceum (CI = 1.07 for women and CI = 1.49 for men). However, in comparison, men valued the wild spices more than women in an overall sense, as well as in medicine, for cultural, and other uses. By contrast, women informants used the wild spices for food purposes much more than men (Fig. 9).
Fig. 8

Radar plot of the use categories components of CI with respect to the sociolinguistic groups

Fig. 9

Cultural importance index (CI) of the species by gender, with the CI component of each use category

Radar plot of the use categories components of CI with respect to the sociolinguistic groups Cultural importance index (CI) of the species by gender, with the CI component of each use category Cultural importance index calculated at community and informant levels yielded different wild spices as of higher cultural significance. The most culturally important species in the surveyed communities were, in order of importance, A. alboviolaceum, L. multiflora, A. angustifolium, and P. guineense (Table 10). At informants’ level and irrespective of sociolinguistic group, gender and phytodistrict, L. multiflora, A. alboviolaceum, and Z. zanthoxyloides had the greater cultural importance. Therefore, A. alboviolaceum and L. multiflora appeared as the most important wild spices for the surveyed communities (CIcom = 3.00 and 2.10 respectively) and informants (CIinf = 1.28 and 1.42 respectively; Table 10).
Table 10

Community and informant cultural importance of the inventoried 14 wild spices

SpeciesCIcomCIinf
Aeollanthus pubescens 0.400.12
Aframomum alboviolaceum 3.00 1.28
Aframomum angustifolium 0.90 0.19
Aframomum melegueta 0.400.08
Clausena anisata 0.200.02
Cymbopogon giganteus 0.300.02
Lippia multiflora 2.10 1.42
Monodora tenuifolia 0.300.05
Piper guineense 0.60 0.14
Securidaca longipedunculata 0.300.03
Thonningia sanguinea 0.200.06
Uvaria chamae 0.200.02
Xylopia aethiopica 0.200.05
Zanthoxylum zanthoxyloides 0.50 0.24

Most important species in each index are in italics

CIcom community cultural importance, CIinf informant cultural

Community and informant cultural importance of the inventoried 14 wild spices Most important species in each index are in italics CIcom community cultural importance, CIinf informant cultural

Use values of the wild spices (UV)

The highest use value was reported for Aframomum alboviolaceum (UV = 0.93; Table 11). Fifty-three specific uses were documented for this species of which the most important was the consumption of the fresh fruit flesh by rural people (Table 12). Lippia multiflora had the second highest use value (UV = 0.76). The fresh young leaves constituted a well-appreciated aromatic spice across all the three phytodistricts. Leaves or inflorescences were often dried and crushed with condiments and served as seasoning in sauce. This spice was attributed stimulating effects on milk production for nursing women. L. multiflora was also particularly used for healing gastrointestinal ailments including indigestion, constipation, stomach-ache, dysentery, hemorrhoid, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. It is also said to have a great potential in regulating high blood pressure (Table 12). The species with the third highest use value was Aframomum angustifolium (UV = 0.18). The species was cited only in Bassila and South-Borgou phytodistricts. Its crushed or pounded fresh roots were used to relief headache (Table 12). The fruit flesh was also eaten as for A. alboviolaceum.
Table 11

Use values of the wild spice species inventoried in the Sudano-Guinean zone of Benin

Species∑UUV
Aeollanthus pubescens 180.08
Aframomum alboviolaceum 2020.93
Aframomum angustifolium 400.18
Aframomum melegueta 130.06
Clausena anisata 30.01
Cymbopogon giganteus 20.01
Lippia multiflora 1660.76
Monodora tenuifolia 40.02
Piper guineense 170.08
Securidaca longepedunculata 40.02
Thonningia sanguinea 130.06
Uvaria chamae 30.01
Xylopia aethiopica 80.04
Zanthoxylum zanthoxyloides 260.12

U number of quotations for a given species, UV use value

Table 12

List of wild spices, used part, processing methods, and forms and purpose of use

Use categoryPlant partProcessing methodForm of usePurpose of useFrequency of citation
Ba (n = 61)Sb (n = 59)Zou (n = 93)
Aeollanthus pubescens Benth.
 FoodLeavesCrush fresh leaves and mix with seasoning and sesameEat as sauceHuman nutrition17
Milk production stimulation for nursing women1
Diarrhea2
Intestinal worms1
Above groundCrush and mix with seasoning and sesameEat as sauceStop hemorrhage for nursing women2
 MedicineLeavesBoil in water as decoctionDrink the liquid 3 times/dayFever2
 OtherPound the fresh leaves and mix with traditional soap kotoTake a shower withDeodorant for nursing women1
Aframomum alboviolaceum (Ridley) K.Schum.
 FoodLeavesBoil young leaves and mix with seasoningEat as vegetableHuman nutrition1
FruitsRemove the cockleshellEat the pulpHuman nutrition575386
Malaria151
Cough1
Crushed dried cockleshells as condiment in sauceEatHuman nutrition2
RootCrushed roots as aromatic spice in sauceEat as sauce, contra-indicated with pregnant womenMilk production stimulation for nursing women3
 MedicineLeavesBoil leaves with stem and roots in water as decoctionDrink the liquid and take a shower 3 times/dayFever and malaria536
Drink the liquid 2 times/dayStomach-ache1
Milk production stimulation for nursing women1
Soak dried leaves in water for 2–3 daysDrink the liquid and take a shower 3 times/dayFever and malaria1
Boil leaves in water as decoctionTake a showerFortify infants2
Drink the liquid, a glass for adult, half for childrenDermatosis11
Boil in water with Caesalpinia pulcherrima leaves, then add a piece of sugarDrink a small glass 2 times/dayIcterus and yellow-fever2
Triturate the leavesDrink the juice 2 times/dayHemorrhoid1
Boil dried leaves in water as decoction. Add 2–3 pieces of sugarDrink the liquid 4–5 times/dayAnemia for children1
Boil in fermented corn water the yellowed leaves with A. angustifolium fruits plus tough potashDrink a glass/daySexual weakness1
Boil in the fermented corn water yellowed leaves with cockleshells of A. angustifolium fruits and tough potashDrink the liquid 2 times/dayPainful menstruation1
Fresh leavesRub the leaves juice against the bodyStop itching or insect bite1
FruitsRemove the cockleshell and Soak the pulp including the seeds in water for 2–3 hDrink the liquidMalaria233
Hematuria1
Pound dried cockleshells with dried seeds of A. meleguetaMake 9 scarifications at the hipHip-ache1
Remove the cockleshellsSmell the scent or eat the pulpNausea for pregnant women2
Boil in water as decoctionDrink the liquid once the dayFortify infants1
Boil 4 fruits with other ingredients as decoctionDrink the liquid 3 times/dayInfertility for women1
Pound fresh fruits and make small bowlsInsert the bowls in the vagina before sleepingAbsence of menstruation1
Soak in water with rootsDrink the liquid 3 times/dayStrengthening of bones2
RootWash fresh rootsEat raw and swallow the juiceSnake bite1
Stomach-ache1
Pounded fresh roots mix with other ingredientsMake a poulticeSnake bite13
Soak in Sodabi or in sorghum fermented beverage for 2–3 daysDrink a small glass 2 times/day - contra-indicated with pregnant womenStomach-ache1
Soak with 7–8 M. myristica seeds and 4 Garcinia kola seedsDrink the liquid 3 times/daySexual weakness1
Dried roots and dried fruits plus tough potash crushed: mixed the powder palm almonds oilEat the mixture, on the morning after eating something sweetenedIntestinal worms1
Crush dried roots with tough potash as powderLap 3 times/dayIntestinal worms1
Boil in water with roots of Imperata cylindricaDrink the liquid 3 times/dayTuberculosis1
Boil in water as decoctionRinse the mouthTooth decay1
Take a showerFever1
Rub the liquid against the woundWound healing1
Drink the liquid 3 times/day - contra-indicated with pregnant womenMalaria1
Crushed with M. myristica seeds, warmRub the mixture against the bodySwelling and edema1
roast with Imperata cylindrica roots, 10 pods of M. myristica, 10 Garcinia kola seeds and tough potash as powderMix with porridge, once on the morningInfertility for women1
Soak in water for 4 daysDrink the liquid and take a shower 2 times/dayFortify the body1
Cut and Soak in the water of beverageDrinkPoultry disease healing1
StemCut the stem and add 3 seeds of A. meleguetaEat and swallow the juiceStomach-ache1
Boil in water as decoction, add shea butterDrink the liquidCough1
Boil in water as decoctionDrink the liquid 3 times/dayMiscarriage1
SeedsMacerate in the traditional palm alcohol (sodabi) dried seeds with papaya’s dried seedsDrink a small glass 3 times/dayStomach-ache1
Take some seeds and add with a Garcinia kola seedEatCough1
roast dried seeds as powder and mix with porridgeDrink the porridgeVertigo
 OtherLeavesTriturate the leaves in waterTake a showerBad body smells1
Fresh leavesWrap up maize based paste (akassa)Trade5
StemFresh stemsAs string to attach luggage on the fieldHome use6
As wipe to punish childrenHome use5
 CeremonySeedsDried seedsEaten by fetishist to activate incantationsMagico-religious2
Aframomum angustifolium (Sonn.) K.Schum.
 FoodLeavesCrushed leaves as aromatic spice in sesame sauceEat the sauceHuman nutrition2
Stop hemorrhage for nursing women1
FruitsRemove the cockleshellEat the pulpHuman nutrition5
RootCrushed roots as aromatic spice in sauceEat as sauceHuman nutrition1
Fortify nursing women1
Icterus1
Headache1
 MedicineLeavesCrushed leaves mixed with salt or in sauceDrink the mixture or eat the sauceStomach-ache1
Soak fresh leaves in waterRinse the face 3 times/daySwelling of the face1
Fresh leavesRub the leaves juice against the face 3 times/daySwelling of the face1
Leaves, roots and fruits as key ingredients for the recipeDrinkDiscard snakes and snake bite healing1
FruitsRemove the cockleshell and Soak the pulp including the seeds in waterDrink the liquidMalaria1
Hematuria1
Crush or pound and mix with shea butterRub the mixture against the bodyAche1
Soak in water with rootsDrink the liquid 3 times/dayStrengthening of bones1
RootBoil in water as decoction with potashDrink the liquidAnemia1
Crush or pound fresh rootsRub the mixture against the bodySwelling and edema12
Crush or pound fresh rootsRub the mixture against the headHeadache7
Boil in water as decoctionTake a showerAche1
Fever1
Crush or pound fresh rootsPut a little in the nostrilsCold1
Crush fresh rootsPut the paste obtained on the decayed toothTooth decay1
Soak in water for 5 min the crushed fresh rootsRub against the head and rinse the faceVertigo1
Soak in water with fruits peduncle and leave under the sunTake a showerMeasles1
StemSoak in germinated corn beverageRinse the faceSwelling of the face1
Cut the fresh stemsEat and swallow the sapCough1
 OtherStemFresh stemsAs string to attach luggage on the fieldHome use2
As wipe to punish childrenHome use1
 CeremonySeedsDried seedsEaten by fetishist to activate incantationsMagico-religious11
Aframomum melegueta (Roscoe)
 MedicineFruitsRemove the cockleshell and Soak the pulp including the seeds in waterDrink the liquidMalaria1
Hematuria1
Crush or pound and mix with shea butterRub the mixture against the bodyAche1
Soak in water with rootsDrink the liquid 3 times/dayStrengthening of bones1
RootSock in palm wineDrink the liquid for 9 days (men) or 7 day (women)Asthenia1
SeedsCrush dried seeds and mix with waterDrink the liquid and drip on the eyes, contra-indicated with pregnant womenAnemia1
Drink the liquid 2–3 times/day, contra-indicated with pregnant womenDiarrhea1
Crush dried seeds and mix with palm alcoholDrink the liquid 2 times/day, contra-indicated with pregnant womenStomach-ache1
Soak with X. aethiopica fruitsDrink a small glass 2 times/day, contra-indicated with pregnant womenStomach-ache1
Crush dried seeds as powderMake scarifications for 9 days (men) or 7 days (women)Paralysis1
Soak in palm alcohol with P. guineense and X. aethiopica fruits, ginger and lemonDrink the liquid 3 times/day, contra-indicated with pregnant womenUlcer1
 CeremonySeedsDried seedsEaten by fetishist to activate incantationsMagico-religious10
Clausena anisata (WilId.) Hook.f. ex Benth.
 MedicineLeavesBoil in water as decoctionTake a showerDermatosis1
RootBoil in water as decoctionDrink the liquid 2 times/dayHemorrhoid1
 CeremonyLeavesFresh leavesMake magic to counter tchakatou dark magicMagico-religious1
Cymbopogon giganteus (Hochst.) Chiov.
 FoodLeavesAttach the leaves and use as aromatic in Cleome gynandra leaves sauceEat the sauceHuman nutrition2
Lippia multiflora Moldenke
 FoodLeavesCrush the young shoots and mix with seasoning and crushed sesame or peanut as aromatic spicesEat the sauceHuman nutrition495429
Boil in water and mix with seasoning as vegetable sauce12
Dry and reduce in powderSprinkle the sauceHuman nutrition433517
Boil fresh leaves in water with cornEatHuman nutrition22
Soak in water with corn and grindEat as akassaHuman nutrition1
Infuse dried leaves in warm water as aromatic teaDrink the teaHuman nutrition11
FlowerDried flowers in whole or crushedSprinkle the sauceHuman nutrition443517
Milk production stimulation for nursing women21
Healing uterine wounds for nursing women31
Indigestion, constipation and stomach-ache85
Dysentery and Hemorrhoid21
Boil flower or leaves in water with seasoning as spice for spicy meatEatHuman nutrition15
 MedicineLeavesBoil in water as decoctionDrink the liquid and take a shower 3 times/dayFever and malaria6925
Fortify infants256
constipation and Stomach-ache117
Diarrhea3
Measles11
Cover the head and take a steam bathHeadache2
Rinse the eyesSore eyes1
Boil in water as decoction or Soak in alcoholDrink the liquidBlood-pressure3
Boil in water with stem and roots as decoctionCold and cough22
Dysentery and Hemorrhoid12
Drink the liquid and rinse the body or take a shower 2 times/dayDermatosis and wound healing25
Boil in water leaves and rootsDrink the liquidHealing uterine wounds for nursing women4
Nausea and vomiting31
Triturate the leavesInhale the gas and drip on the eyesHeadache1
Put the juice into the nostrilsCold1
Drink the juice before going to hospitalSnake bite1
Fresh leavesEat and swallow the juiceCough
RootBoil in water as decoctionDrink the liquid 2–3 times/dayAnemia for children11
Nausea and vomiting10
Indigestion and Stomach-ache29
Diarrhea1
Ulcer2
Intestinal worms2
Drink the liquid and take a showerFever and malaria122
Fortify infants3
Boil in water as decoction with small red onions, X. aethiopica fruits and M. myristica seedsDrink the liquid and take a showerDermatosis and wound healing71
Crush or pound fresh rootsRub the mixture against the bodySwelling and edema11
Soak in water for 2 hDrink the liquid 3 times/dayPainful menstruation1
Soak in water for 3 days with X. aethiopica fruitsRinse the eyesSore eyes1
Crush dried roots with 9 A. melegueta seeds and X. aethiopica fruit as powderInhale the powderHeadache1
StemBoil in water as decoctionDrink the liquid 3 times/dayAsthma1
 CulturalFlowerDried flowersUse to spicy sauceFood21
Monodora tenuifolia Benth.
 FoodSeedsRoast the seed to remove the cockleshells and crush the almond, use as aromatic spice in sauceEat the sauceHuman nutrition1
Crush almonds with X. aethiopica fruits and mix with pepper, chili, other spices and seasoningEat as sauceStomach-ache1
 MedicineSeedsBoil in water with X. aethiopica fruits, U. chamae roots and small red onionsDrink the liquid 3 times/dayStomach-ache1
Black menstruations and absence of menstruations1
Crush the almond and mix with palm almond oilRub the mixture against the bodyFever1
Boil in water as decoctionTake a showerFever1
FlowerChar flowers with U. chamae roots as powder and an A. melegueta fruit podSprinkle woundsIncurable wounds healing1
BarkCrush dried bark and 7 A. melegueta seeds as powder and mix with palm almond oilPut the mixture in the woundsWound healing1
Soak fresh barks in the waterRinse a woundWound healing1
RootPound dried roots and mix with sugar and sulfur as powderMix the powder with the porridgeDysentery and Hemorrhoid1
 CeremonySeedsDried seedsUsed by fetishist for various ceremoniesMagico-religious4
Piper guineense Schumach. & Thonn.
 FoodLeavesFresh leaves crushed or in whole as aromatic spice in sauceEatHuman nutrition13
FruitsCrush dried fruits and mix with seasoning11
StemCut fresh stems and put in the sauce2
RootPut fresh roots in the sauce1
 MedicineLeavesBoil in water as decoctionDrink the liquidDermatosis1
FruitsSock in water dried fruits with ginger and fruit of X. aethiopicaDrink the liquid, contra-indicated with pregnant womenDermatosis1
Soak in alcohol dried fruits with A. melegueta and X. aethiopica fruitsUlcer1
Hematuria1
Soak dried fruits in alcoholDrink the liquid 2 times/dayBlood-pressure1
Crush dried fruits and mix with saltDrink the mixture
 CeremonyFruitsDried fruitsUsed by fetishist for ceremonies of fâMagico-religious5
Securidaca longipedunculata Fresen.
 MedicineRootCrush or pound the rootsMake a poulticeEdema and abscess2
Soak in water with X. aethiopica fruits and M. myristica seedsDrink the liquidantibiotic1
Boil in water with U. chamae and Z. zanthoxyloides roots, X. aethiopica fruits, M. myristica seeds and small red onionsDrink the liquid once the dayStomach-ache1
Soak in alcohol with garlic and A. melegueta seedsDrink the liquidFever1
Thonningia sanguinea Vahl
 MedicineRootRub against a rockRub the root juice against the bodyEdema, abscess, swelling, wound and mumps101
Dry and reduce in powder the roots with papaya roots and fruits of A. meleguetaHemorrhoid1
Crush the rootsRub the past against the bodyGuinea-worm disease1
Uvaria chamae P.Beauv.
 FoodFruitsRipe fruitEatHuman nutrition1
RootCrush and mix with seasoning as aromatic spiceEatHuman nutrition1
 MedicineLeavesBoil in water as decoctionTake a showerFever1
RootSoak in alcohol with X. aethiopica fruits, M. myristica and A. melegueta seedsDrink the liquid 2 times/dayStomach-ache2
Boil in water with ripe palm fruitsDrink the liquidAnemia1
Xylopia aethiopica (Dunal) A.Rich.
 MedicineFruitsBoil or soak in water with A. melegueta seedsDrink the liquid 3 times/dayStomach-ache3
Dried fruitsEat the fruit and swallow the juiceNausea and vomiting1
Boil in water with other ingredients as decoctionDrink the liquidInfertility for women2
Boil in water as decoctionDrink the liquidFortify infants1
Crush dried fruits and mix with alcoholRub the mixture against the bodyEdema, swelling and dermatosis2
Crush dried fruits as powder and mix with sugarMix the powder with the beverage and drinkAsthenia1
 CeremonyFruitsDried fruitsUsed by fetishist for various ceremoniesMagico-religious2
Zanthoxylum zanthoxyloides (Lam.) Zepernick & Timler
 FoodRootRemove, dry and crush roots’ barks as powderSpicy sauces and eat, contra-indica with pregnant womenHuman nutrition25
Milk production stimulation for nursing women9
Stomach-ache and ulcer4
Dysentery and diarrhea2
Healing uterine wounds for nursing women5
 MedicineRootSoak the roots’ barks in alcoholDrink the liquid 2–3 times/day, contra-indicated with pregnant womenStomach-ache14
Nausea and vomiting1
Intestinal worms1
Sexual weakness1
Soak the roots’ barks in alcohol with A. melegueta seedsAbortion2
Soak the roots’ barks in alcohol with garlic, pepper, chili, X. aethiopica fruits, M. myristica and A. melegueta seedsDrink the liquid 2–3 times/day, contra-indicated with pregnant womenUlcer3
Menstruation issue1
Boil in water the roots’ barks with garlic, pepper, chili, X. aethiopica fruits, M. myristica and A. melegueta seedsDrink the liquid 2–3 times/day, contra-indicated with pregnant womenSexually transmissible infections1
Boil in water the roots’ barks with ginger leaves as decoctionDrink the liquidPainful and dark menstruation2

Ba Bassila, Sb South-Borgou

Use values of the wild spice species inventoried in the Sudano-Guinean zone of Benin U number of quotations for a given species, UV use value List of wild spices, used part, processing methods, and forms and purpose of use Ba Bassila, Sb South-Borgou

Uses diversity

A total of 205 specific uses were recorded for the 14 wild spices in the three phytodistricts. The first three species with the highest specific uses were A. alboviolaceum (53 uses), followed by L. multiflora (45 uses) and A. angustifolium (29 uses), while only one specific use was mentioned for Cymbopogon giganteus. Wild spices were used mostly for medicine (144 uses) and lesser for cultural (1 use) purposes. All uses are documented in Table 12. Leaves had the highest number (64 uses) of specific uses while the bark (2 uses) had the lowest specific uses (Fig. 10).
Fig. 10

Number of specific use for each plant part of wild spice in the Sudano-Guinean Zone

Number of specific use for each plant part of wild spice in the Sudano-Guinean Zone

Local perception of the dynamic of wild spices populations and threatening factors

Most of the informants (92.02%) indicated their perception regarding the dynamic of wild spices’ populations. Perceptions varied significantly among phytodistricts (p < 0.001), with no variation as regards age categories (p = 0.063) and gender (p = 0.131). Most respondents indicated that wild spices’ populations declined over time. Stability was mentioned mostly in the phytodistrict of Zou; meanwhile, an increase was mentioned mainly in Bassila. No increase in the dynamic was recorded in the South-Borgou phytodistrict (Fig. 11).
Fig. 11

Local perception of the dynamic of wild spice populations by phytodistrict

Local perception of the dynamic of wild spice populations by phytodistrict The main threatening factors purported responsible for the decline in wild spices’ populations were agriculture, grazing, and drought in the three regions (Fig. 12). The most important factor was agriculture in South-Borgou (cited by 33.33% of respondents), grazing in Zou (32.94%), whereas drought and agriculture were equally quoted in Bassila (25.33% each). Bushfires, demographic pressure, and charcoal production also contributed to a lesser extent to the decline of the spices population in the Zou, South-Borgou, and Bassila phytodistricts respectively.
Fig. 12

Factors purported responsible of the decline of the wild spice populations in the Sudano-Guinean zone

Factors purported responsible of the decline of the wild spice populations in the Sudano-Guinean zone

Local perception of the nutritional value of the wild spices

Overall, 87.32% of informants indicated their perception of the nutritional value of the wild spices that they use in their diet. Significant variation of perceptions exists among phytodistricts (p < 0.001) and age categories (p = 0.038). However, no significant variation was observed between gender (p = 0.219). High nutritional value was mentioned mostly in South-Borgou and Bassila phytodistricts (respectively 71.93% and 57.89% of the respondents) whereas people from Zou (38.89% of respondents) assigned an average nutritional value to the wild spices. Adults (62.34%) and old informants (60%) acknowledged higher nutritious value to wild spices compared to young (40.51%). Overall, women and men perceived wild spices as highly nutritious (Fig. 13).
Fig. 13

Local perceptions of the nutritional value of the wild spices. a Phytodistrict. b Age category. c Gender. p = p value from Fisher’s exact text

Local perceptions of the nutritional value of the wild spices. a Phytodistrict. b Age category. c Gender. p = p value from Fisher’s exact text

Priority wild spices for conservation

The Point Scoring Procedure (PSP) method yielded a list of priority wild spices for conservation, with M. tenuifolia, L. multiflora, X. aethiopica, S. longipedunculata, and A. melegueta as top five highest priority. For the PSPW method, M. tenuifolia, X. aethiopica, L. multiflora, Z. zanthoxyloides, and S. longipedunculata appeared as the top five highest priority. For the CRS method, the top five priority wild spices were M. tenuifolia, X. aethiopica, L. multiflora, A. melegueta, Z. zanthoxyloides, and A. angustifolium. For the BRS method, the top five priority species were A. melegueta, M. tenuifolia, P. guineense, U. chamae, and X. aethiopica. By crossing results of each method, the top five species for conservation, selected in the Sudano-Guinean zone, were A. alboviolaceum, L. multiflora, X. aethiopica, Z. zanthoxyloides, and M. tenuifolia (Table 13).
Table 13

List of top 5 priority wild spices for conservation in the Sudano-Guinean Zone in Benin

SpeciesPSPPSPWCRSBRSTotal
Aframomum alboviolaceum xxxx4
Lippia multiflora xxxx4
Xylopia aethiopica xxxx4
Zanthoxylum zanthoxyloides xxxx4
Monodora tenuifolia xxxx4

PSP point scoring procedure, PSPW point scoring procedure with weighing, CRS compound ranking system, BRS binomial ranking system

List of top 5 priority wild spices for conservation in the Sudano-Guinean Zone in Benin PSP point scoring procedure, PSPW point scoring procedure with weighing, CRS compound ranking system, BRS binomial ranking system

Discussion

Diversity of the wild spices across phytodistricts

A total of 14 wild spices was recorded throughout the Sudano-Guinean zone. This species richness seems relatively low when compared to that reported from a similar study conducted in the Niger Delta area in Nigeria (24 species) [52]. This difference could come from the location of part of Benin in the Dahomey-Gap, an approximately 200-km-wide savanna corridor from Ghana to Benin, separating the Upper and the Lower Guinean rain forest blocks [53]. This phenomenon does not allow an impressive biological diversity but rather induced a relatively few number of endemic species to Benin as most species are shared with neighboring countries. This situation added to NTFPs’ overexploitation, climate change, and raging demography with its subsequent consequences, increasingly compromises indigenous species persistence, thus, leading to the scarcity or disappearance of critical species [8, 54]. Further, extensive land use and cover transitions and the intensification of human pressure in the surrounding of protected areas increases the vulnerability of species [55]. Consequently, the wild spices should be conserved through their integration in the traditional agroforestry systems. Wild species used as spices in the Sudano-Guinean zone belong mainly to the families of Zingiberaceae, Annonaceae, and Rutaceae which are well-known for holding much of aromatic plants and spices [56]. The inventoried wild spices richness was predominated by Afrotropical and Guineo-Congolian species and a low representation of Sudano-Guinean species. This could be explained by human migration associated with seed dispersal and propagation of the species across areas, ruling out isolation by distance, as reported for Caesalpinia bonduc L. [57]. Likewise, the genetic diversity and genetic differentiation might be low for these species, due to parental links between populations. This may reduce their ability to survive and adapt to changing environmental conditions.

Traditional knowledge, informant consensus, cultural importance and use value of the wild spices

The study showed how Traditional knowledge (TK) of wild spices is structured in the Sudano-Guinean Zone. Our results support the general hypothesis that TK depends on geographical location, sociolinguistic group, and gender [58]. Indeed, people in Bassila phytodistrict held the greatest level of knowledge, and regarding the sociolinguistic difference in TK, Tchabè informants from Bassila reported more uses than other sociolinguistic groups. This suggests that the wild spices are mostly used in the Bassila phytodistrict and less in the Zou and South-Borgou phytodistricts. Male informants reported more uses than female ones. Although this finding does not confirm the general statement that women are reservoirs of traditional plant knowledge [59], similar findings have been reported in Benin [60, 61] and Mexico [62]. As suggested by Voeks [59], this might be due to gender division of the space and labor. The most culturally important wild spices as revealed from our data were, by order of importance, L. multiflora, A. alboviolaceum, and Z. zanthoxyloides. People in Bassila phytodistrict culturally valued more wild spices than those from the other phytodistricts. This is congruent with the TK pattern of wild spices. The two species with the highest cultural importance (CI) value were the most quoted in all three phytodistricts. This similarity may have resulted from a common cultural background. Irrespective of gender and age category, studied sociolinguistic groups valued different wild spices. For instance, A. alboviolaceum was most culturally important for Fon, L. multiflora for Mahi, and Z. zanthoxyloides for Tchabè from Bassila. Such intercultural variation in wild plant species use is consistent with previous studies in Benin [19, 63, 64]. Irrespective of sociolinguistic group, gender and age categories, the most culturally important uses of the wild spices were for food, medicine and cultural practices respectively. This finding clearly attests that spices are initially intended for food. With respect to gender, the most culturally important use for men was medicinal and to some extent ceremonial, while women, almost exclusively, were specialized in using the spices for food. The medicinal and ceremonial relatedness of preference use values for men could be associated to the cultural custodianship of men in the sociolinguistic groups studied. In most villages in Benin, men are assumed to be the tradition guardian and are often engaged in ceremonial and magico-religious activities. This makes them more knowledgeable in these use categories. For instance, Monodora tenuifolia, a wild spice used by Mahi men for rituals in convents of traditional divinities, is totally unknown to women of the same sociolinguistic group. Similarly, African black pepper (Piper guineense) fruits constitute an essential component in Fâ rituals [65] and are often harvested from the sacred groves of Badjamè by Adja priests. Meanwhile, Adja women harvested the leaves of the same plant in surrounding of the sacred groves for flavoring soups but none of them knew that the plant they always harvest was actually black pepper plant. As all these roles are generally devoted to men, they may likely have more knowledge of medicinal and ceremonial plants than women. On the other side, women are most involved in performing household labors and would thus be more knowledgeable on food plants and less on ritual or ceremonial plants. The difference of preference of use between men and women confirms the hypothesis of gender division of space and labor within households [59]. Overall, the informant consensus analysis revealed a high level of agreement among the informants for all use categories indicating a more consistent use of wild spices. This opens an avenue for the sustainable management of these neglected resources through promotion of their domestication involving local communities. As it could be expected, the highest degree of agreement was found for food use category, and followed by medicinal uses. This may be due to the high number of use reports for only ten wild spices consumed in the study area (Table 7). It indicates that information pertaining to the use of food/edible wild spices is shared among informants in the surveyed communities. More interestingly, men and women shared the same level of agreement suggesting that female informants are as well informed as male informants. Moreover, the degree of consensus varied among the sociolinguistic groups with Idatcha people having the least agreement (Fic = 0.88). It appeared thus that these people collect randomly wild spices for particular uses contrary to Tchabè from Zou phytodistrict who relied on only two wild spices for all uses (Fic = 0.98). Therefore, the rarefaction or loss of one of the many wild spices available for Idatcha is expected to have a little impact on the overall use and the traditional practices in this sociolinguistic group [66]. Meanwhile, more attention should be devoted to the two species used by Tchabè in the Zou phytodistrict [67]. The wild spices with high use values were A. alboviolaceum, L. multiflora, A. angustifolium, and Z. zanthoxyloides respectively. The highest UV of A. alboviolaceum comes from the fact that the species is a multipurpose plant widespread in savannas across Benin and most farmers use it as wild food and thirst quencher in the field which are often far from the villages. Moreover, many farmers value its stem as string to make bundle of firewood and bind luggage a (Table 12). This emphasizes the key role and value of wild foods in the daily life of agricultural communities [68]. Two of the spices (L. multiflora and Z. zanthoxyloides) were used in the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases, ailments which are common in the study area due to low availability of drinking water and sanitation facilities [69]. In addition to their use as food spice, Z. zanthoxyloides and L. multiflora were also attributed stimulating effects on milk production in nursing women. This corroborates previous findings of Segnon and Achigan-Dako [70] and Atanasso et al. [71] who reported the same uses for Z. zanthoxyloides and L. multiflora respectively. Considering wild spices use categories, the high number of specific uses (144 uses) as medicine compared to food category (39 uses) contrasts however with the previous use pattern of wild spices: food use category remained first. Nevertheless, this finding is congruent with the statement that indigenous people value wild spices more for their ethnomedicinal uses than for spicing food [52]. Another reason might result from intercultural knowledge gaps in the use of some species. For instance, Fon people did not make food use of L. multiflora at all, while the species was highly culturally important for Mahi for food needs. Since home gardens are critical in conserving plant biodiversity, their promotion as home for wild spices should be encouraged, particularly in areas of Bassila occupied by Tchabè. This will help to diversify household incomes, conserve the species, and strengthen the food and nutritional security of rural people. Most of the respondents acknowledged decline of wild spice populations over the time. Main factors responsible for this decline as perceived by local people were both anthropogenic and natural. Among anthropogenic factors, crop cultivation stood first followed by grazing. This finding is in accordance with a previous study on Sclerocarya birrea where land clearance for agricultural purposes, carving, and drought were the main threatening factors [72]. In recent years, increasing attention has been given to the prioritization of wild plant species and their conservation in Benin. While the previous prioritization studies undertaken so far have targeted different groups of species such as non-timber forest products (NTFPs) [64], wild edible plants [20], crop wild relatives [47], neglected and underutilized species [73], and timber species, none of these studies has focused on wild spices. The only previous study that listed some wild spices for conservation is the Red List of threatened plant species of Benin [4], with six species (Monodora myristica, Tetrapleura tetraptera, Xylopia aethiopica, X. rubescens, Zanthoxylum gilletii, and Z. zanthoxyloides) documented as threatened based on the IUCN criteria [74]. Four of those wild spice taxa were missing from our inventory and the missing taxa included two species (M. myristica and Z. gilletii) whose respective ecological range was out of the extent of the study area, and two others that were not recorded from our ethnobotanical inventory. This could also suggest that threat is a temporally dynamic process influenced by several external (human-associated and environment-related) and internal (reproduction, viability, inbreeding, genetic erosion, and adaptability) factors [75], and a species that has a low conservation concern today can become highly threatened in the future [76]. Urgent conservation action to safeguard the wild spices would be the only way to ensure the availability of these resources for the future generations. Indeed, agriculture in Benin and in sub-Saharan Africa in general is characterized by rainfed and low-input subsistence farming practiced by rural households [77], and more new lands are cleared every year for food production, as most soils have low fertility. A step-change in current agricultural system is hence needed if the impact of farming on wild plant species is to be mitigated [78]. However, this does not mean that food production must be neglected ipso facto for the conservation of wild plant species. Rather, policymakers should find a trade-off between agriculture and conservation in order to feed the fast-growing populations while preserving wild resources for future generations. For instance, sustainable intensification of agriculture would be an attractive alternative that can reduce considerably agriculture contribution to habitat destruction [79], and increase sustainability and effectivity of conservation actions targeting wild spices. Although the method and criteria used were not the same, current results partially confirm and are complementary to the ones from Neuenschwander et al. [4], who listed a few wild spices as priority for conservation in Benin. Actually, there are no single approaches to generate lists of species to include in conservation plans. In this study, we adopted a recent approach developed by Brehm et al. [21] and successfully implemented by Idohou et al. [47] in assessing priority crop wild relatives for conservation in Benin. This approach is very flexible and allows combination of several socio-economic and ecological criteria in different methods, in order to achieve the objectives of the study. It differs from the approach used by Teso et al. [80], Berlingeri and Crespo [81], and Khoury et al. [82] to identified priority crop wild relatives for conservation in Spain, Venezuela, and USA respectively. However, the approach is time consuming giving the number of criteria considered and the different methods it combines to overcome the potential subjectivity that may result from attribution of scores and weights to each criterion. Besides, its implementation requires a lot of information that are not often available for most wild species, particularly the ones that are neglected by government and researchers. This being true for the functional group of wild spices in Benin, this prioritization exercise should be updated when more new information will be available on the species. Moreover, results from this approach may not necessarily reflect the conservation significance of each priority species as perceived by local people. This could greatly affect the acceptability and the success of any conservation action of wild spices at local level, since the communities’ interests may have been overlooked [20]. Indeed, the criteria used here may not correspond to those used by communities in their evaluation of the value of wild spices and much less to their perception of threatened species.

Conclusion

This is a pioneer study in the field of wild spices investigation across habitats in Benin. It highlights how geographic location, sociolinguistic groups, and gender influence the traditional knowledge and the subsequent use pattern of the wild spices. Indeed, people in Bassila phytodistrict, especially Tchabè, are more knowledgeable on the use of wild spices. Likewise, male informants value the wild spices much more than women. Domestication and improvement programs of these species should take into account this traditional knowledge. The most culturally important species and uses are all functions of sociolinguistic grouping and vary according to phytodistrict. Based on the local perception of the nutritional value of wild spices, the study revealed that people give them a high nutritional value, while at the same time using them mostly for medicinal purposes. In addition, the wild spices are perceived in decline by local populations, mainly due to high anthropogenic pressures and to some extent drought. Besides, the study provides insights into which species in this study area should be given more priority in an active conservation. For effective conservation and sustainable management of wild spices, scientists must provide substantial data on such aspects as morphological and genetic diversity within the species and breaking of seed dormancy. We proposed the integration of the wild spices into home gardens and agroforestry-based systems in the sociolinguistic areas of Tchabè, in the phytodistrict of Bassila. This will ensure the conservation of the resources while helping the diversification of household incomes and enhancing nutritional and food security.
  19 in total

Review 1.  Genus xylopia (Annonaceae): chemical and biological aspects.

Authors:  Isabel C Moreira; Nidia F Roque; Wagner Vilegas; Cynthia A Zalewski; João Henrique G Lago; Mariko Funasaki
Journal:  Chem Biodivers       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  Medicinal plants in Mexico: healers' consensus and cultural importance.

Authors:  M Heinrich; A Ankli; B Frei; C Weimann; O Sticher
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 3.  The role of herbs and spices in cancer prevention.

Authors:  Christine M Kaefer; John A Milner
Journal:  J Nutr Biochem       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 6.048

4.  Traditional knowledge hiding in plain sight - twenty-first century ethnobotany of the Chácobo in Beni, Bolivia.

Authors:  Narel Y Paniagua Zambrana; Rainer W Bussmann; Robbie E Hart; Araceli L Moya Huanca; Gere Ortiz Soria; Milton Ortiz Vaca; David Ortiz Álvarez; Jorge Soria Morán; María Soria Morán; Saúl Chávez; Bertha Chávez Moreno; Gualberto Chávez Moreno; Oscar Roca; Erlin Siripi
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 2.733

5.  Local knowledge, pattern and diversity of use of Sclerocarya birrea.

Authors:  Gerard N Gouwakinnou; Anne Mette Lykke; Achille E Assogbadjo; Brice Sinsin
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.733

6.  Ethnobotanical study of wild edible plants in Derashe and Kucha Districts, South Ethiopia.

Authors:  Kebu Balemie; Fassil Kebebew
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 2.733

7.  Comparative analysis of diversity and utilization of edible plants in arid and semi-arid areas in Benin.

Authors:  Alcade C Segnon; Enoch G Achigan-Dako
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 2.733

8.  Knowledge and valuation of Andean agroforestry species: the role of sex, age, and migration among members of a rural community in Bolivia.

Authors:  Regine Brandt; Sarah-Lan Mathez-Stiefel; Susanne Lachmuth; Isabell Hensen; Stephan Rist
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 2.733

9.  Traditional knowledge on herbal drinks among indigenous communities in Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan.

Authors:  Neelam Rashid; Rodrigue Castro Gbedomon; Mushtaq Ahmad; Valère Kolawolé Salako; Muhammad Zafar; Khafsa Malik
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.733

10.  Chemical composition and fatty acid content of some spices and herbs under Saudi Arabia conditions.

Authors:  Fahad Mohammed Al-Jasass; Mohammed Saud Al-Jasser
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-12-24
View more
  3 in total

1.  Composition of homegarden plants and cultural use in an indigenous community in Northwest Ethiopia.

Authors:  Metsehet Yinebeb; Ermias Lulekal; Tamrat Bekele
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.404

2.  Chemical composition and the insecticidal activity of Aeollanthus pubescens leaf essential oil against Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto.

Authors:  Roméo Barnabé Bohounton; Luc Salako Djogbénou; Oswald Yédjinnavênan Djihinto; Oronce Sedjro-Ludolphe Dedome; Pierre Marie Sovegnon; Bruno Barea; Aristide Adomou; Pierre Villeneuve; Fidèle Paul Tchobo
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 3.876

3.  The best choices: the diversity and functions of the plants in the home gardens of the Tsang-la (Motuo Menba) communities in Yarlung Tsangpo Grand Canyon, Southwest China.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Li-Xin Yang; Ming-Xiang Li; Yong-Jie Guo; Shan Li; Yu-Hua Wang
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 2.733

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.