| Literature DB >> 30441789 |
Xiaoxi Dong1,2,3, Yuelong Xu4,5, Shasha Wang6,7,8, Junping Zhao9,10, Bin Ren11,12, Lihui Zhang13,14, Zhenfa Liu15,16,17.
Abstract
Environmental problems caused byEntities:
Keywords: adsorption behavior; carbon aerogels; electrochemical performance; metal ions; super capacitor
Year: 2018 PMID: 30441789 PMCID: PMC6265943 DOI: 10.3390/ma11112271
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Figure 1. (A) Pseudo-first-order kinetic model and (B) pseudo-second-order kinetic model.
Figure 2Langmuir isothermal adsorption model for CA-X.
Figure 3Adsorption isotherm of CA-X.
The adsorption capacity of CA-X.
| Entry | Adsorption Capacity (mg·g−1) |
|---|---|
| CA-Fe | 133 |
| CA-Cr | 139 |
| CA-Cu | 424 |
Comparative study of different adsorbent for the removal of metal ions.
| Adsorbents | Metal Ions | Adsorption Capacities (mg·g−1) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active carbon | Fe | 166.7 | [ |
| Carbon paper@Magnesium silicate | Cu | 113.5 | [ |
| carbon nanotubes | Cu | 123.7 | [ |
| Magnetic b-cyclodextrin/graphene oxide | Cr | 120.19 | [ |
| Carbon bead-supported hollow carbon nanofibers | Cr | 51 | [ |
| Carbon aerogel | Cu/Cr/Fe | 424/139/133 | This work |
Figure 4Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms of the CA-X and the blank.
Figure 5Pore size distribution in the CA-X samples and the blank.
Pore structure of the CA-X.
| Entry | SBET (m2·g−1) | Smicro (m2·g−1) | Daverage (nm) | Vtotal (cm3·g−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA-Fe | 666 | 413 | 8.00 | 1.33 |
| CA-Cr | 627 | 374 | 7.50 | 1.18 |
| CA-Cu | 450 | 274 | 7.16 | 0.81 |
| Blank | 695 | 463 | 8.11 | 1.52 |
Figure 6SEM images of CA-X (A) CA-Fe (B) CA-Cr (C) CA-Cu and (D) Blank, EDS of CA-X (E), CA-Fe (F) and CA-Cr (G).
Figure 7TEM images of (A) CA-Fe, (B) CA-Cr, (C) CA-Cu, and (D) Blank, HRTEM images of (a) CA-Fe, (b) CA-Cr and (c) CA-Cu.
Figure 8XRD patterns of CA-X.
Figure 9XPS spectra of CA-X, full-scan spectrum (a,b,c), C1s (d), and O1s (e).
Figure 10CV curves of different CA-X at a scan rate of 0.5 mV·s−1.
Figure 11Galvanostatic charge-discharge curves at a current density of 1.0 A·g−1.
The specific capacitance of CA-X and the blank at different current densities.
| Entry | Specific Capacitance (F·g−1) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 A·g−1 | 1.0 A·g−1 | 1.5 A·g−1 | |
| CA-Fe | 239 | 215 | 196 |
| CA-Cr | 256 | 238 | 213 |
| CA-Cu | 275 | 255 | 234 |
| CA-Cu-0 | 250 | 224 | 186 |
| Blank | 129 | 125 | 122 |
Comparison of the specific capacitance of different carbon materials.
| Carbon Species | Metal Species | Capacitance (F·g−1) | Current Density (A·g−1) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon fiber | V | 104.05 | 0.5 | [ |
| Onion-like carbon | Fe | 251.2 | 0.5 | [ |
| Active carbon aerogels | Mn | 152 | 1.0 | [ |
| Carbon | Ta | 223 | 1.0 | [ |
| Graphene | Zr-MOFs | 302 | 0.15 | [ |
| Carbon aerogel | Cu | 255 | 1.0 | This work |
Figure 12Charge/discharge cycles of CA-X, CA-Cu-0, and blank at the current density of 1.5 A·g−1.
Figure 13Nyquist plot of CA-X and the blank.
Figure 14Nyquist graph of Zre plotted against ω−1/2 of CA-X and the blank.