| Literature DB >> 30440010 |
Sérgio R Moreira1,2, Alfredo A Teixeira-Araujo1,2,3, Eduardo S Numata Filho1, Milton R Moraes4, Herbert G Simões4.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to characterize the psychophysiological demand in different capoeira performances. Eleven experienced capoeira practitioners underwent the following procedures in different days: 1) anamnesis and anthropometric measurements; 2) aerobic performance assessment; 3 to 5) performances of 90 seconds in three capoeira styles (Angola, Benguela and São Bento), which were performed in randomized controlled cross-over design. The psychophysiological demand was assessed through the heart rate (HR), R-R interval (RRi), blood pressure (BP), blood lactate ([Lac]), blood glucose ([Gluc]), rating perceived effort (RPE), feeling scale (FS) and perceived activation (PA). Descriptive statistics with mean and standard deviation was performed. A two-way repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc test was used. The Angola demand was between 56-71% maximal HR with [Lac]PEAK: 6.9±2.9 mM, RPEPEAK: 10.0±2.2 pts and FS: 2.7±1.7 pts, while in the Benguela participants reached 64-85% maximal HR with [Lac]PEAK: 9.5±3.0 mM, RPEPEAK: 11.0±2.8 pts and FS: 2.1±1.6 pts and for São Bento between 69-102% maximal HR with [Lac]PEAK: 15.7±2.6 mM, RPEPEAK: 15.5±4.1 pts and FS: -0.8±3.0 pts. Interaction time*performance occurred to [Lac] (F = 42.157; p<0.001), HR (F = 12.154; p<0.001), RRi (F = 4.774; p<0.001), parasympathetic modulation-rMSSD (F = 3.189; p<0.01), [Gluc] (F = 2.152; p<0.05), RPE (F = 5.855; p<0.01), FS (F = 2.448; p<0.05) and PA (F = 3.893; p<0.05). We concluded that São Bento rhythm resulted in a greater physiological demand according to the HR, [Lac] and cardiac autonomic indicators, with the Benguela rhythm being intermediate while the Angola rhythm presented a reduced demand. The [Gluc] increased after the São Bento rhythm when compared to the other rhythms. The perceptual demand presented increased in terms of RPE and PA variables and decreased in terms of FS when the São Bento performance was analyzed in comparison to the Angola and/or Benguela in capoeira.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30440010 PMCID: PMC6237361 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207276
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Consort flow diagram.
After the first two visits, all participants performed in randomized controlled cross-over design with three experimental sessions in different capoeira rhythms (Angola, Benguela and São Bento).
Mean (±SD) of general characteristics of the sample.
| N | 11 |
|---|---|
| Practice time (y) | 10.7±5.8 |
| Age (y) | 33.0±7.3 |
| Weight (kg) | 75.6±13.5 |
| Height (cm) | 173.3±5.2 |
| Body mass index (kg·m-2) | 25.1±3.8 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 84.0±9.3 |
| Skinfold ∑7 (mm) | 71.7±28.0 |
| Body fat (%) | 15.0±5.4 |
| Resting SBP (mmHg) | 123.0±12.3 |
| Resting DBP (mmHg) | 80.4±8.9 |
| Postprandial glucose (mM) | 6.2±0.7 |
| PPOMAIT (watts) | 266.0±45.0 |
| HRPPO (bpm) | 188.0±11.0 |
| RPEPPO (Borg[ | 18.8±1.4 |
SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; PPO: peak power output; MAIT: maximal aerobic incremental test; HR: heart rate; RPE: rate of perceived exertion. The Skinfold ∑7 were performed from triceps, subscapularis, suprailiac, abdomen, chest, thigh and calf measures using a traditional scientific skinfold caliper (CESCORF/Mitutoyo, Porto Alegre/RS, Brasil). The body fat was calculated by predictive equations.
Fig 2Experimental design.
BP: blood pressure; HR: heart rate; RRi: R-R interval (heart rate variability); RPE: rate of perceived exertion; FS: feeling scale; PA: perceived activation; [Lac]: blood lactate concentration; [Gluc]: blood glucose concentration.
Mean (±SD) of heart rate variability responses (RRi) in the minimum heart rate (HRMIN), average heart rate (HRAVE) and peak heart rate (HRPEAK) during different capoeira performances in absolute (bpm) and relative values to the heart rate of the end of the maximal aerobic incremental test equivalent to the peak power output (%HRPPO) (n = 11).
| 105 ± 12 | 119 ± 8 | 129 ± 5 | |
| | 56 ± 7 | 64 ± 5 | 69 ± 3 |
| 606 ± 79 | 526 ± 74 | 466 ± 18 | |
| 126 ± 21 | 153 ± 9 | 178 ± 8 | |
| | 67 ± 12 | 82 ± 6 | 95 ± 3 |
| 519 ± 97 | 415 ± 66 | 341 ± 16 | |
| 132 ± 19 | 158 ± 9 | 191 ± 12 | |
| | 71 ± 11 | 85 ± 6 | 102 ± 3 |
| 489 ± 82 | 401 ± 67 | 318 ± 19 |
*P<0.01 to Benguela and São Bento
†P<0.01 to São Bento
aP<0.01 to RRi-HRAVE and RRi-HRPEAK in the same performance
bP<0.01 to RRi-HRPEAK in the same performance.
Mean (±SD) of psychophysiological variables in the resting (Rest) and during recovery minutes (Rec1’ to Rec9’) after different capoeira performances (n = 11).
| Rest | Rec1’ | Rec3’ | Rec5’ | Rec7’ | Rec9’ | Main effect | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time | Time | ||||||||
| 79±8 | 109±15 | 95±12 | 92±12 | 92±11 | 91±11 | ||||
| 78±9 | 124±19 | 106±11 | 102±11 | 99±13 | 100±11 | ||||
| 78±12 | 145±16 | 118±12 | 111±11 | 109±11 | 108±10 | ||||
| 783±63 | 565±77 | 659±88 | 672±91 | 659±86 | 655±97 | ||||
| 799±77 | 484±74 | 575±65 | 593±63 | 616±76 | 614±75 | ||||
| 774±77 | 432±71 | 516±62 | 546±55 | 555±61 | 562±56 | ||||
| 27±13 | 14±9 | 18±8 | 18±9 | 16±7 | 16±6 | ||||
| 27±9 | 8±5 | 8±5 | 8±5 | 9±6 | 10±5 | ||||
| 27±8 | 3±1 | 4±2 | 4±2 | 4±2 | 4±3 | ||||
| 6.3±4.0 | 3.3±1.6 | 6.0±6.8 | 6.0±6.7 | 4.7±3.1 | 10.3±8.4 | ||||
| 5.2±2.3 | 9.1±6.9 | 8.8±7.7 | 9.9±8.0 | 12.3±9.5 | 13.2±12.5 | ||||
| 4.7±1.8 | 17.2±17.1 | 14.6±7.4 | 12.5±5.7 | 13.3±10.2 | 16.2±10.4 | ||||
| 121±13 | 154±17 | 136±15 | 128±12 | 126±10 | 127±11 | ||||
| 124±11 | 161±20 | 145±21 | 134±13 | 133±13 | 133±18 | ||||
| 124±14 | 168±27 | 146±17 | 139±13 | 130±13 | 126±16 | ||||
| 81±8 | 90±11 | 86±11 | 84±9 | 81±8 | 84±10 | ||||
| 80±8 | 100±19 | 86±7 | 83±11 | 86±6 | 84±7 | ||||
| 80±11 | 108±22 | 88±16 | 84±21 | 79±10 | 77±12 | ||||
| 1.2±0.3 | 6.3±2.4 | 6.9±2.9 | 5.8±2.7 | 5.9±2.5 | 5.3±2.4 | ||||
| 1.2±0.3 | 8.3±2.4 | 9.5±3.0 | 9.2±3.0 | 8.7±2.9 | 8.1±2.7 | ||||
| 1.1±0.2 | 11.2±2.3 | 14.3±2.0 | 14.9±2.4 | 15.7±2.6 | 15.2±2.2 | ||||
| 6.5±1.9 | 5.8±1.2 | 6.3±1.1 | 5.5±1.5 | 6.2±0.8 | 6.0±1.2 | ||||
| 5.9±1.3 | 6.4±0.7 | 6.5±0.9 | 6.4±0.8 | 6.3±0.6 | 6.3±0.6 | ||||
| 6.1±1.1 | 7.1±0.9 | 7.7±0.6 | 7.3±1.4 | 7.7±1.0 | 6.8±2.4 | ||||
| 6.1±0.3 | 10.0±2.2 | 7.7±1.7 | 8.2±3.9 | 7.3±2.2 | 7.5±2.0 | ||||
| 6.4±0.9 | 11.0±2.8 | 8.8±2.2 | 8.1±1.7 | 6.9±1.6 | 7.1±1.8 | ||||
| 7.5±1.2 | 15.5±4.1 | 12.5±2.7 | 10.5±2.7 | 10.0±3.6 | 8.6±3.2 | ||||
| 3.6±2.0 | 2.7±1.7 | 3.1±1.6 | 3.4±1.6 | 3.8±1.5 | 3.5±1.8 | ||||
| 3.8±1.7 | 2.1±1.6 | 2.8±1.4 | 3.1±1.6 | 3.4±1.7 | 3.1±1.9 | ||||
| 3.4±1.9 | -0.8±3.0 | 0.8±2.4 | 1.6±2.3 | 2.2±2.3 | 2.6±1.7 | ||||
| 1.0±0.0 | 3.0±1.2 | 2.3±1.6 | 1.5±0.9 | 1.6±1.2 | 1.8±1.5 | ||||
| 1.2±0.6 | 3.5±1.6 | 2.6±1.4 | 2.2±1.5 | 2.0±1.5 | 1.9±1.6 | ||||
| 1.0±0.0 | 4.9±1.5 | 3.9±1.3 | 2.8±1.0 | 2.6±1.5 | 2.1±1.2 | ||||
HR: heart rate; RRi: absolute mean of R-R interval series; rMSSD: root mean square differences of successive RRi; LF:HF: sympathetic-vagal balance from the low and high frequency components; SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; [Lac]: blood lactate concentration; [Gluc]: blood glucose concentration; RPE: rate of perceived exertion; FS: feeling scale; PA: perceived activation.
*P < 0.05 to Rest
†P < 0.05 to Benguela and Angola
‡P < 0.05 to Angola
#P < 0.05 to Benguela.
Fig 3Responses to affective valence (feeling scale) and perceived activation pre and post different capoeira performance plotted in circumplex space [24].
Fig 4Representative movements of Angola, Benguela and São Bento rhythms and summary of psychophysiological characterization during and right after (1 to 9 minutes) the development of each capoeira performance.
The arrows in front of each variable means the magnitude of change due to the capoeira performance.