Literature DB >> 30439460

Bioequivalence Comparison of Pediatric Dasatinib Formulations and Elucidation of Absorption Mechanisms Through Integrated PBPK Modeling.

Shruthi Vaidhyanathan1, Xiaoning Wang2, John Crison1, Sailesh Varia3, Julia Z H Gao3, Ajay Saxena4, David Good5.   

Abstract

SPRYCEL® (Dasatinib) is a Biopharmaceutical Classification System II weakly basic drug that exhibits strong pH-dependent solubility. Dasatinib is currently presented in 2 drug product formulations as an adult immediate release tablet and a pediatric powder for oral suspension. A bioequivalence study comparing the formulations in adult healthy subjects found that overall exposure (AUC0-24) from suspension treatments was ∼9% to 13% lower, Cmax was similar, and median Tmax from powder for oral suspension was ∼30 min earlier. To understand the mechanism contributing to this behavior, a combination of biorelevant dissolution studies and physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling was used to simulate in vivo performance. In vitro biorelevant dissolution confirmed that the rate and extent of release was similar between tablet and suspension formulations (>90% release within first 15 min). Physiologically based pharmacokinetic parameter sensitivity analysis demonstrated particular sensitivity to dosage form gastric residence time. A 12% higher AUC0-24 was simulated for tablet dosage forms with 10 to 15 min longer gastric transit relative to solutions or suspensions of small particulates (rapid gastric emptying). The corresponding narrow simulated Cmax range also agreed with observed tablet and suspension bioequivalence data. The unique physicochemical properties, absorption characteristics, and inherent differences in dosage form transit behavior are attributed to influence the dasatinib bioequivalence.
Copyright © 2019 American Pharmacists Association®. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  absorption; bioequivalence; biopharmaceutical characterization; formulation; gastroPlus modeling; in silico modeling; intestinal absorption; physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling; special populations

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30439460     DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2018.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0022-3549            Impact factor:   3.534


  8 in total

1.  Prediction of Oral Drug Absorption in Rats from In Vitro Data.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Akiyama; Naoya Matsumura; Asami Ono; Shun Hayashi; Satoko Funaki; Naomi Tamura; Takahiro Kimoto; Maiko Jiko; Yuka Haruna; Akiko Sarashina; Masahiro Ishida; Kotaro Nishiyama; Masahiro Fushimi; Yukiko Kojima; Takuya Fujita; Kiyohiko Sugano
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Vitamin C Improves Dasatinib Concentrations Under Hypochlorhydric Conditions of the Simulated Stomach Duodenum Model.

Authors:  Fouad S Moghrabi; Aktham Aburub; Hala M Fadda
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.580

Review 3.  Current State and Challenges of Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Modeling (PBBM) in Oral Drug Product Development.

Authors:  Di Wu; Min Li
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 4.580

4.  Integration of a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Model for Tegoprazan and Its Metabolite: Application for Predicting Food Effect and Intragastric pH Alterations.

Authors:  Hyeon-Cheol Jeong; Min-Gul Kim; Zhuodu Wei; Kyeong-Ryoon Lee; Jaehyeok Lee; Im-Sook Song; Kwang-Hee Shin
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 6.525

Review 5.  Applications, Challenges, and Outlook for PBPK Modeling and Simulation: A Regulatory, Industrial and Academic Perspective.

Authors:  Wen Lin; Yuan Chen; Jashvant D Unadkat; Xinyuan Zhang; Di Wu; Tycho Heimbach
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 4.580

Review 6.  In Silico Modeling and Simulation to Guide Bioequivalence Testing for Oral Drugs in a Virtual Population.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Ranran Jia; Huitao Gao; Xiaofei Wu; Bo Liu; Hongyun Wang
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 5.577

Review 7.  In Vitro Dissolution and in Silico Modeling Shortcuts in Bioequivalence Testing.

Authors:  Moawia M Al-Tabakha; Muaed J Alomar
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 6.321

8.  Predictive Performance of Physiology-Based Pharmacokinetic Dose Estimates for Pediatric Trials: Evaluation With 10 Bayer Small-Molecule Compounds in Children.

Authors:  Ibrahim Ince; André Dallmann; Sebastian Frechen; Katrin Coboeken; Christoph Niederalt; Thomas Wendl; Michael Block; Michaela Meyer; Thomas Eissing; Rolf Burghaus; Jörg Lippert; Stefan Willmann; Jan-Frederik Schlender
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 3.126

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.