Literature DB >> 3043622

Instrumental variables in the evaluation of diagnostic test procedures when the true disease state is unknown.

N J Nagelkerke1, V Fidler, M Buwalda.   

Abstract

We explore the estimation of sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests when the true disease state is unknown. Instrumental variables which subdivide the patient population are used. A logistic model, relating these instrumental variables to the (unknown) true disease state is proposed. It is shown that this procedure allows the goodness-of-fit to the resulting model to be tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3043622     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780070703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  5 in total

1.  Binomial regression with a misclassified covariate and outcome.

Authors:  Sheng Luo; Wenyaw Chan; Michelle A Detry; Paul J Massman; Rachelle S Doody
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Simultaneous inference of a misclassified outcome and competing risks failure time data.

Authors:  Sheng Luo; Xiao Su; Min Yi; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.404

3.  A Bayesian model for misclassified binary outcomes and correlated survival data with applications to breast cancer.

Authors:  Sheng Luo; Min Yi; Xuelin Huang; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Joint model for a diagnostic test without a gold standard in the presence of a dependent terminal event.

Authors:  Sheng Luo; Xiao Su; Stacia M DeSantis; Xuelin Huang; Min Yi; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  13C-urea breath test threshold calculation and evaluation for the detection of Helicobacter pylori infection in children.

Authors:  Ralf Herold; Michael Becker
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-05-16       Impact factor: 3.067

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.