Literature DB >> 30431694

Initial outcomes of local anaesthetic freehand transperineal prostate biopsies in the outpatient setting.

Francesca Kum1, Oussama Elhage1,2, Jed Maliyil2, Kathie Wong1, Nicholas Faure Walker1, Meghana Kulkarni1, Benjamin Namdarian1, Benjamin Challacombe1,2, Paul Cathcart1, Rick Popert1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the histopathological outcomes, morbidity and tolerability of freehand transperineal (TP) prostate biopsies using the PrecisionPoint™ access system (Perineologic, Cumberland, MD, USA) under local anaesthetic (LA) in the day surgery and outpatient environments, as systematic and targeted biopsies can be taken with the potential for reduced morbidity, particularly sepsis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 176 patients underwent freehand TP prostate biopsies from May 2016 to November 2017. The procedure was carried out either under LA alone or with the addition of sedation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were reported using the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS), version 2. Tolerability was assessed using a visual analogue scale pain score for each procedural stage. Histopathological outcomes and complications were recorded.
RESULTS: The mean (range) age was 65 (36-83) years, median (range) prostate-specific antigen level was 7.9 (0.7-1374) ng/mL, and the mean (range) prostate volume 45 (15-157) mL. Biopsies were taken under LA alone (160 patients, 90%) or under LA with sedation (16, 9%). The main indication for biopsy was primary diagnosis (88.6%). In all, 91 (52%) patients underwent systematic TP biopsies (mean 24.2 cores). Cognitive MRI-targeted biopsies alone were performed in 45 patients (26%; mean 6.8 cores), and 40 (23%) had both systematic and target biopsies (mean 27.9 cores). Of the 75 patients who had primary systematic biopsies alone, 46 (61%) were positive, and 28/46 (60.9%) were diagnosed with clinically significant disease (Gleason ≥3+4). VAS pain scores were greatest during LA administration. There were five complications (2.8%, Clavien-Dindo Grade I/II). No patients developed urosepsis.
CONCLUSIONS: Freehand TP biopsies using the PrecisionPoint access system is a safe, tolerable and effective method for systematic and targeted biopsies under LA in the outpatient setting. It has replaced transrectal biopsies in our centre and has potential to transform practice.
© 2018 The Authors BJU International © 2018 BJU International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  #PCSM; #Prostate Cancer; #uroonc; complications; histology; prostate biopsy; transperineal; transrectal

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30431694     DOI: 10.1111/bju.14620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  12 in total

1.  Transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy under intravenous anaesthesia: a clinical, microbiological and cost analysis of 2048 cases over 11 years at a tertiary institution.

Authors:  Matthew J Roberts; Alastair Macdonald; Sachinka Ranasinghe; Harrison Bennett; Patrick E Teloken; Patrick Harris; David Paterson; Geoff Coughlin; Nigel Dunglison; Rachel Esler; Robert A Gardiner; Thomas Elliott; Louisa Gordon; John Yaxley
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 2.  Pooled outcomes of performing freehand transperineal prostate biopsy with the PrecisionPoint Transperineal Access System.

Authors:  Michael Tzeng; Spyridon P Basourakos; Hiten D Patel; Matthew J Allaway; Jim C Hu; Michael A Gorin
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2022-06-28

Review 3.  Rationale and protocol for randomized study of transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy efficacy and complications (ProBE-PC study).

Authors:  Badar M Mian; Ronald P Kaufman; Hugh A G Fisher
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 4.  Transperineal prostate biopsy: a review of technique.

Authors:  Alice Thomson; Mo Li; Jeremy Grummet; Shomik Sengupta
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-12

5.  Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation active surveillance prostate cancer cohort: a characterisation of a prostate cancer active surveillance database.

Authors:  Salonee Shah; Kerri Beckmann; Oussama Elhage; Aida Santaolalla; Mieke Van Hemelrijck; Ben Challacombe; Rick Popert; Prokar Dasgupta; Jonah Rusere; Grace Zisengwe
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Transperineal prostate biopsy identifies locations of clinically significant prostate cancer in men considering focal therapy with PI-RADS 3-5 regions of interest.

Authors:  Nelson Stone; Vassilios Skouteris; Samuel Chang; Athanasios Klimis; M Scott Lucia
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2021-10-05

Review 7.  Role of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Spyridon P Basourakos; Mark N Alshak; Patrick J Lewicki; Emily Cheng; Michael Tzeng; Antonio P DeRosa; Mathew J Allaway; Ashley E Ross; Edward M Schaeffer; Hiten D Patel; Jim C Hu; Michael A Gorin
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-01-29

8.  Local versus general anesthesia transperineal prostate biopsy: Tolerability, cancer detection, and complications.

Authors:  Donnacha Hogan; Abbie Kanagarajah; Henry H Yao; David Wetherell; Brendan Dias; Phil Dundee; Kevin Chu; Homayoun Zargar; Helen E O'Connell
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2021-09-10

9.  TREXIT: initial experience with transperineal prostate biopsy under local anesthesia in an outpatient setting in South East Asia.

Authors:  Arianto Yuwono; Rolando Salada; Teck Wei Tan
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2021 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 10.  Optimal biopsy approach for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Simona Ippoliti; Peter Fletcher; Luca Orecchia; Roberto Miano; Christof Kastner; Tristan Barrett
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.