Literature DB >> 30430877

Early clinical features and risk factors for cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective case-control study.

Lanrong Luo1,2, Xiangyan Ruan1,3, Changdong Li2, Suwen Chen2, Qiaofei Hu2, Alfred O Mueck1,3.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate early clinical features and risk factors for cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP). Study group of 206 CSP patients out of 6853 women with early pregnancies, diagnosed from 2014 to 2016 was compared with a randomly selected control group of 412 patients. Early clinical features for CSP were vaginal bleeding (OR: 9.65; 95% CI: 5.67-16.41), lower abdominal pain (OR: 3.8; 95% CI: 1.52-9.54) and increased white blood cells (OR: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.12-1.50). Important risk factors for CSP were artificial abortion within the last pregnancy (OR: 4.13; 95% CI: 2.23-7.66), 0 ∼ 1 year and 2 ∼ 3 year interval between present and last pregnancy (OR: 2.27; 95% CI: 1.11-4.67 and OR: 2.15; 95% CI: 1.15-4.03). Pregnancy problems are important issues within the scope of 'Gynecological Endocrinology'. Vaginal bleeding and lower abdominal pain, although unspecific, could be early clinical symptoms of CSP, especially if main risk factors exist such as abortion within the last pregnancy and short interval to the last pregnancy. Knowing this can help for prevention and early diagnosis CSP which can reduce life-threatening complications such as massive hemorrhage and can avoid hysterectomy. Consequence also must be to avoid unwanted pregnancies by using effective contraception, especially in risk patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean scar pregnancy; early clinical features; risk factors

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30430877     DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2018.1526276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol        ISSN: 0951-3590            Impact factor:   2.260


  5 in total

1.  Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Evaluation of Mifepristone for Treatment of Low-Risk Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.

Authors:  Xi Xiong; Chun-Yan Gao; De-Mei Ying; Ping Yan; Zhi-Jia Zhang; Na Kuang; Hong-Ju Tian; Li Luo; Shu-Yu Long; Zheng-Qiong Chen
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Potential risk factors for caesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  B Gull; V Klerelid; A Jormeus; A Strandell
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2021-05-01

3.  The trend of the distribution of ectopic pregnancy sites and the clinical characteristics of caesarean scar pregnancy.

Authors:  Panpan Tang; Xiaomao Li; Wenwei Li; Yunhui Li; Yu Zhang; Yuebo Yang
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 3.355

4.  Identifying possible risk factors for cesarean scar pregnancy based on a retrospective study of 291 cases.

Authors:  XianYi Zhou; Hua Li; XiaoDong Fu
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 1.730

5.  Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography on the detection of cesarean scar pregnancy: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoyi Xiao; Rixing Ding; Lei Peng; Huaping Liu; Yun Zhu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.