| Literature DB >> 30430270 |
Xiaokun Zhang1, Shuai Liu1, Fang Wu1, Xiaoli Peng1, Baoguo Yang2, Yong Xiang3.
Abstract
I-III-VI2 compounds have shown great interests in the application of functional semiconductors. Among them, Cu(In,Ga)S2 has been a promising candidate due to its excellent optoelectronic properties. Although the polymorphs of Cu(In,Ga)S2 have been attracted extensive attentions, the efforts to developing the methodologies for phase-controlled synthesis of them are rare. In this paper, we reported a phase-selective synthesis of CIGS nanoparticles with metastable phases via simply changing the composition of solvents. For the wet chemistry synthesis, the microstructure of the initial nuclei is decisive to the crystal structure of final products. In the formation of Cu(In,Ga)S2, the solvent environment is the key factor, which could affect the coordination of monomers and influence the thermodynamic conditions of Cu-S nucleation. Moreover, wurtzite and zincblende Cu(In,Ga)S2 nanoparticles are selectively prepared by choosing pure en or its mixture with deionized water as reaction solvent. The as-synthesized wurtzite Cu(In,Ga)S2 possess a band gap of 1.6 eV and a carrier mobility of 4.85 cm2/Vs, which indicates its potential to construct a heterojunction with hexagonal-structured CdS for solar cells.Entities:
Keywords: CIGS; Metastable; Nanoparticles; Phase-selective; Wurtzite; Zincblende
Year: 2018 PMID: 30430270 PMCID: PMC6235770 DOI: 10.1186/s11671-018-2781-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Res Lett ISSN: 1556-276X Impact factor: 4.703
Fig. 1XRD patterns of CIGS NPs synthesized in pure en solvent (a) and en/water mixture solvent (b)
Fig. 2Raman spectra of pure en (purple line), the mixture of en and deionized water (blue line), the solutions of the S precursor in pure en (green line), and the solutions of the S precursor in the mixture of en and deionized water (red line)
Fig. 3Absorption spectra of the solutions of the Cu precursor in en (green line), deionized water (blue line), and the mixture of en and deionized water (violet line)
Fig. 4Representative SEM images of WZ-structured (a, b, c) and ZB-structured (c, b, d) CIGS NPs
Composition of WZ- and ZB-structured CIGS NPs (calculated by the measured atomic ratios derived from EDS, the listed ratios are the average of 6 measured values from three individual samples)
| Sample | Cu:In:Ga:S | Cu:(In+Ga) | [0.5Cu+1.5(In+Ga)]:S |
|---|---|---|---|
| WZ-CIGS | 1:0.86:0.30:2.16 | 1:1.16 | 1:0.96 |
| ZB-CIGS | 1:0.68:0.28:1.76 | 1:0.96 | 1:0.91 |
Electrical properties calculated from the Hall effect measurement
| Sample | Conduction type | Sheet resistivity (Ω/□) | Carrier concentration (cm−3) | Mobility (cm2/Vs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WZ-CIGS | N-type | 9.9 × 105 | 8.53 × 1014 | 4.85 |
| ZB-CIGS | N-type | 4.1 × 107 | 4.27 × 1014 | 0.34 |