| Literature DB >> 30430146 |
Moliang Zhou1, Sen Yang1, Xinyu Li1, Shuyu Lv1, Shuhong Chen1, Ivan Marsic1, Richard Farneth2, Randall Burd2.
Abstract
Trace alignment algorithms have been used in process mining for discovering the consensus treatment procedures and process deviations. Different alignment algorithms, however, may produce very different results. No widely-adopted method exists for evaluating the results of trace alignment. Existing reference-free evaluation methods cannot adequately and comprehensively assess the alignment quality. We analyzed and compared the existing evaluation methods, identifying their limitations, and introduced improvements in two reference-free evaluation methods. Our approach assesses the alignment result globally instead of locally, and therefore helps the algorithm to optimize overall alignment quality. We also introduced a novel metric to measure the alignment complexity, which can be used as a constraint on alignment algorithm optimization. We tested our evaluation methods on a trauma resuscitation dataset and provided the medical explanation of the activities and patterns identified as deviations using our proposed evaluation methods.Entities:
Keywords: evaluation; process mining; trace alignment; trauma resuscitation
Year: 2017 PMID: 30430146 PMCID: PMC6231409 DOI: 10.1109/ICHI.2017.57
Source DB: PubMed Journal: IEEE Int Conf Healthc Inform