Literature DB >> 30430080

GEMO, a National Resource to Study Genetic Modifiers of Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variant Carriers.

Fabienne Lesueur1, Noura Mebirouk1, Yue Jiao2, Laure Barjhoux3, Muriel Belotti2, Maïté Laurent2, Mélanie Léone4, Claude Houdayer2, Brigitte Bressac-de Paillerets5, Dominique Vaur6, Hagay Sobol7, Catherine Noguès7, Michel Longy8, Isabelle Mortemousque9, Sandra Fert-Ferrer10, Emmanuelle Mouret-Fourme2, Pascal Pujol11, Laurence Venat-Bouvet12, Yves-Jean Bignon13, Dominique Leroux14, Isabelle Coupier11, Pascaline Berthet6, Véronique Mari15, Capucine Delnatte16, Paul Gesta17, Marie-Agnès Collonge-Rame18, Sophie Giraud4, Valérie Bonadona19,20, Amandine Baurand21, Laurence Faivre21, Bruno Buecher2, Christine Lasset19,20, Marion Gauthier-Villars2, Francesca Damiola3, Sylvie Mazoyer22, Sandrine M Caputo2, Nadine Andrieu1, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet2,23.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA1/2 mutation carriers; DNA banking; breast cancer; genetic epidemiology; pathogenic variant (PV)

Year:  2018        PMID: 30430080      PMCID: PMC6220051          DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Oncol        ISSN: 2234-943X            Impact factor:   6.244


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

Women carrying a pathogenic variant (PV) in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) genes are at high lifetime risk of developing breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC), but estimation of the cumulative risk of cancer to age 70 years varies substantially between studies and populations. Initial estimations were obtained from selected high-risk families with multiple cases, such as those ascertained through the Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium used to identify disease loci (1). In the first retrospective studies conducted on such families, estimates for BC ranged from 40 to 87% for BRCA1 PV carriers and from 27 to 84% for BRCA2 PV carriers and estimates for OC ranged from 16 to 68% for BRCA1 PV carriers and from 11 to 27% for BRCA2 PV carriers (1–4). Recently, the largest prospective cohort conducted to date reported cumulative risks of BC to age 80 years of 72% for BRCA1 PV carriers and 69% for BRCA2 PV carriers (5). In the same study, cumulative risks of OC to age 80 years were 44% for BRCA1 PV carriers and 17% for BRCA2 PV carriers. Variation in cancer risks within or between BRCA1/2 families, with respect to age at diagnosis or type of cancer, can be explained by other genetic factors and/or lifestyle and reproductive factors (6–10). Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) conducted by the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) have identified 172 common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with small increases in breast and/or ovarian cancer risk in the general population (11). A subset of these SNPs modifies the risk of breast and ovarian cancer risk for BRCA1/2 PV carriers (12–14) but most of the variability has not been explained yet (15). Breast and ovarian cancer risks in BRCA1/2 PV carriers might also vary according to the location of the variant and/or its origin (14, 16–19). Genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 has been part of genetic counseling in European Union countries and North America since their discovery in the 90's, and has greatly improved recommendations about clinical management options and the most appropriate treatments. Nonetheless, both retrospective and prospective studies on large datasets of BRCA1/2 PV carrier families are still very much needed to refine individual cancer risk estimates by considering other genetic and lifestyle/environmental factors, and they will also contribute to a better understanding of the correlation between mutant BRCA1/2 alleles and phenotype. In particular, accurate age-specific risk estimates for the different types of cancer would be useful when choosing risk reduction strategies such as prophylactic bilateral mastectomy or salphingo-oophorectomy. The Genetic Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 (GEMO) Group is the French multidisciplinary, collaborative framework for the investigation of genetic factors modifying cancer risk in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian cancer (HBOC) families segregating BRCA1/2 PVs. Its primary aims are to contribute to large-scale national and international projects to identify genetic modifiers and to facilitate the translation of research results to the clinical setting. This is achieved by establishing a resource of blood DNA samples from individuals carrying a PV together with family and clinical data through the nation-wide network of cancer genetic clinics. Here we report on the progress of the GEMO study, the characteristics of the 5,303 actual participants and the prevalence and spectrum of BRCA1/2 cancer-associated variants identified so far.

Participants and methods

Organization of cancer predisposition testing in france

GEMO investigators include molecular geneticists, clinicians, genetic counselors, and epidemiologists who are involved in the Genetic and Cancer Group (GGC), a consortium with support of UNICANCER whose objectives are to define optimal testing practices both in terms of genetic counseling and laboratory techniques, and to contribute to the estimation of individual's cancer risks (http://www.unicancer.fr/en/cancer-and-genetic-group). GGC has contributed to the national development of BRCA1/2 screening tests and genetic consultations and, therefore improved management of subjects at high-risk of cancer. Currently, there are 145 cancer genetic counseling units and 17 laboratories performing BRCA1/2 testing (or panel testing of multiple cancer susceptibility genes) in France (see Supplementary Data for methods used by laboratories for PV identification). Eligibility criteria for BRCA1/2 testing according to the current national clinical guidelines are (i) at least 3 first or second degree relatives affected with breast or ovarian cancer in the same family branch, (ii) 2 first-degree relatives with BC, one of them having been diagnosed before age 41, or one before age 51 and the other before age 71, (iii) 2 first-degree relatives with BC, one of them being a male, (iv) 1 BC case before age 36, or before age 51 if triple negative tumor, (v) 1 case with bilateral BC, the first one before age 50, (vi) 1 male BC, (vii) 1 OC before age 71, or at any age if high-grade serous OC. By 2016, 17,821 probands (i.e., the first individual tested in the family) were tested for BRCA1/2, and 1,670 (9.4%) were found to carry a PV. A similar number of probands carried a variant of uncertain clinical significance (VUS). A total of 6,417 relatives (essentially first-degree relatives of probands) underwent targeted screening tests and about 39% of them were found to carry the PV identified in the proband (http://www.e-cancer.fr).

Ascertainment of GEMO participants

GEMO participants are from HBOC families ascertained prospectively through family cancer clinics and tested positive for a confirmed PV in BRCA1/2. The GEMO study was initiated in 2006 and is still ongoing. Initially, only female PV carriers aged 18 or older, affected or unaffected with cancer were invited to participate in the study by geneticists. Adult male PV carriers have been invited to participate since 2013. Today, GEMO involves 32 clinics and the 17 diagnostics laboratories from the GGC.

Protocol, data collection, and database

The GEMO coordinating center was located at Centre Léon Bérard (Lyon) until September 2015 and is currently held at Institut Curie (Paris). All data and biospecimens are stored without personal identifiers. The GEMO case report form (CRF) includes information on participants' family history, gyneco-obstetrics risk factors (age at menarche, number of pregnancies, age at menopause), preventive surgery and tumor pathology (histology, grade, tumor size, hormone receptors status). Data on socio-demographic variables (age at inclusion, sex, ethnicity/population ancestry) and medical history of cancer (laterality, other cancer prior recruitment into study) are also collected. Geneticists invite BRCA1/2 PV carriers, whether affected with cancer or not, to participate in GEMO during the consultation informing them of their BRCA1/2 positive test results. After completing the CRF with the participant, the geneticist sends it to the coordinating center, and requests that an aliquot of the blood DNA sample (at least 10 μg) that was used for genetic testing is shipped from the testing laboratory to the coordinating center. The study protocol is illustrated in Supplementary Figure 1. Recently, an upgraded electronic database on FileMaker Pro 16 (FileMaker Inc., Santa Clara, California, USA) was developed to collate, manage and distribute core data and DNA samples, and to facilitate inter-operability with the GGC BRCA1/2 (ex-UMD-BRCA1/BRCA2) database (20) and that of the prospective cohort on BRCA1/2 PV carriers GENEPSO (21).

Ethics

The study is performed in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration and received a favorable review of the French National Committees for personal data protection in medical research (CCTIRS N°07223 and CNIL agreement N°1245228). GEMO has human ethics approval at all the participating institutions where subjects are recruited. All research projects making use of data and/or materials collected by GEMO are required to have independent ethical approval from their host institutions. Participants give written informed consent during genetic counseling sessions and understand that as a result of participation, personal details will be recorded and stored in a coded format on a database. They consent to samples of DNA material prepared from blood cells being stored in a central location and to de-identified information and samples being made available for scientifically and ethically approved research projects. Informed consent agreements signed by participants are kept in the clinics.

Access to DNA samples and to family and clinical data

Investigators wishing to use the GEMO DNA collection and related clinical and family data submit a brief expression of interest to principal investigators (gemo@curie.fr) who then circulate the proposal to the GEMO steering committee with a 10-day opportunity given to highlight any major issues, especially duplication of, or complementarity to, existing projects. If favorably reviewed, a full application is then submitted and verified to ensure that sufficient resources to conduct the project exist, the amount of DNA requested is appropriate, and that the proposal has any required ethics approvals. When the project is accepted, a material transfer agreement and/or a data transfer agreement are signed between the coordinating center and the research institution of the applicant. DNA samples along with related data are sent to the applicants who commit to providing annual progress reports. To further enrich the GEMO resource, applicants are required to supply their research data to GEMO after publication, and/or 12 months after completion of their projects.

Variant classification

The description of the genetic variants follows recommendations proposed by the Human Genome Variation Society (22). Variants are denoted using the cDNA reference sequences NM_007294.3 (BRCA1) and NM_000059.3 (BRCA2). Only carriers of a clear BRCA1/2 PV are included in GEMO. PVs are defined as variants considered as pathogenic by the GGC (20), the Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles consortium (23), the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA) (24) and/or published variants classified as pathogenic using multifactorial likelihood approaches (25, 26).

Results

Collection of DNA samples and data

As of April 2018, 5,303 participants with available DNA sample had been enrolled in GEMO. Participants included 3,087 BRCA1 PV carriers (2,877 women and 210 men) and 2,216 BRCA2 PV carriers (2,005 women and 211 men) belonging to 2,190 and 1,544 families, respectively. The mean number of participants per family was 1.4 (range: 1–11). For 600 families, DNA samples were collected from three or more family members. While no individuals in the dataset carried more than a single PV, four families segregated two PV in two branches of the family (family 1: BRCA1:c.5137del and BRCA2:c.2808_2811del; family 2: BRCA1:c.1480C>T and BRCA1:c.3839_3843delinsAGGC; family 3: BRCA1:c.3841C>T and BRCA2:c.4889C>G; family 4: BRCA1:c.4391_4393delinsTT and BRCA2:c.7680dup).

Participants' characteristics

At inclusion, 56.3% of BRCA1 female PV carriers were diagnosed with BC (mean age at diagnosis: 41.3, range 22–81), 18.3% were diagnosed with OC or fallopian tube cancer (mean age at diagnosis: 51.9, range 16–92) and 33.2% were free of these cancers (mean age at inclusion: 40.5, range 18–101). With respect to BRCA2, 61.1% of female PV carriers had BC (mean age at diagnosis: 43.6, range 21–90), 10.1% had OC or fallopian tube cancer (mean age at diagnosis: 57.9, range 31–99) and 32.9% were free of these cancers (mean age at inclusion: 42.1, range 19–91). Among the 421 male participants, 2.9% of BRCA1 PV carriers and 6.2% of BRCA2 PV carriers were diagnosed with prostate cancer at inclusion (mean age at diagnosis for BRCA1: 61.5, range 48–71 and 64.1, range 50–78 for BRCA2). Ten percent of males carrying a BRCA2 PV had BC (mean age at diagnosis: 58.8, range 44–77) vs. none in male BRCA1 PV carriers. Detailed characteristics of participants (probands and relatives) according to their cancer status are shown in Table 1. Parity, age at menarche and age at menopause (natural or artificial) for female PV carriers are shown in Supplementary Table 1. Female participants reported an average number of live births of 1.7 and a mean age at menarche of 12.9 years. No difference in parity or age at menarche was observed between women affected and unaffected with cancer, and no differences were observed between probands and relatives. Mean age at menopause (natural or artificial) was 45.7 and 47.8 years in BRCA1 and BRCA2 PV carriers, respectively. Information on prophylactic mastectomy or salphingo-oophorectomy is not systematically recorded in GEMO. However, based on available data, we identified 600 out of 4,882 female participants (12.3%) who had had bilateral or unilateral mastectomy. For 50 of them mastectomy was prophylactic as they had not developed BC at inclusion (1.0%). Among the 1,496 women (30.6%) who had had bilateral oophorectomy at inclusion, 1,005 (20.5%) had not developed OC or fallopian tube cancer and this surgery was likely prophylactic.
Table 1

Characterisitics of the GEMO subjects.

BRCA1 familiesBRCA2 families
ProbandsRelativesProbandsRelatives
NMean age at inclusion, y (range)Mean age of onset for first cancer, y (range)NMean age at inclusion, y (range)Mean age of onset for first cancer (range)NMean age at inclusion, y (range)Mean age of onset for first cancer (range)NMean age at inclusion, y (range)Mean age of onset for first cancer (range)
INDIVIDUALS AFFECTED WITH CANCER
Women (breast only)1,15446.8 (19–92)40.3 (22–81)24047.5 (18–77)41.1 (25–71)94949.4 (21–86)42.5 (21–77)19352.4 (21–87)45.3 (25–76)
Women (ovarian/fallopian tubea)44557.2 (33–80)51.8 (25–86)8155.8 (22–72)51.9 (16–92)17762.0 (37–84)57.6 (31–84)2667.3 (44–100)60.2 (41–99)
Women (breast and ovarian/fallopian tube)18659.9 (37–80)46.0 (26–71)3857.4 (39–70)46.0 (31–71)7263.2 (50–84)49.1 (25–76)1171.6 (46–100)61.3 (36–90)
Men (breast only)001662.2 (49–79)58.4 (47–77)270.0 (69–71)63.5 (63–64)
Men (prostate only)0668.7 (58–78)61.5 (48–71)364.0 (57–77)56.5 (50–63)769.6 (61–78)64.8 (53–78)
Men (breast and prostate)00268.0 (67–69)60.0 (60–60)176.053.0
Women (other cancerb)446.5 (33–58)41.8 (31–56)334.7 (24–43)32.0 (21–39)657.3 (44–69)50.7 (34–64)555.2 (45–69)43.6 (30–68)
Men (other cancerb)566.8 (49–80)62.0 (45–72)671.0 (64–79)65.4 (62–70)353.0 (40–73)51.7 (39–71)456.8 (45–73)50.0 (28–65)
INDIVIDUALS UNAFFECTED WITH CANCER
Women50039.9 (18–83)44938.6 (18–86)33442.3 (18–80)31439.8 (18–91)
Men7847.6 (21–72)11751.6 (23–89)5249.4 (19–80)12248.2 (19–79)

May have had also breast cancer.

Other than breast, ovary/fallopian tube, prostate cancer or basal cell carcinoma.

Characterisitics of the GEMO subjects. May have had also breast cancer. Other than breast, ovary/fallopian tube, prostate cancer or basal cell carcinoma. Only 26.9% of participants self-reported their population ancestry/ethnicity. Among them, 90.8% were European, 3.5% were African, 0.3% were Asian and 4.1% were of other or mixed origin. Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) ancestry was reported by 1.3% of participants.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants

Currently, 506 BRCA1 and 494 BRCA2 unique PVs are described in the GEMO database. The number of families in which each PV was observed is shown in Supplementary Table 2 and the distribution of PVs across the gene sequences is shown in Figure 1. The five most common PVs accounted for 21.3% of all PVs in BRCA1 and 14.9% of all BRCA2 PVs. The most common BRCA1 PVs were c.5266dup (7.5%) and c.68_69del (3.9%), originally described as founder PVs in the AJ population (30), the c.3481_3491del founder PV from North-Eastern France (4.9%) (31, 32), and the two common European PVs c.4327C>T (2.7%) and c.3839_3843delinsAGGC (2.2%) (33). The most common BRCA2 PVs were c.2808_2811del (3.3%), c.5946del (3.2%), a Western European PV of AJ origin (34), c.4889C>G (2.2%), c.8364G>A (2.1%), c.5645C>A (1.9%), and c.7680dup (1.9%). There were 267 BRCA1 PVs and 265 BRCA2 PVs observed only once in GEMO.
Figure 1

Distribution and occurrence of pathogenic variants along BRCA1 (A) and BRCA2 (B) in probands in the GEMO study. BRCA1 domains are: RING domain, Coiled Coil domains, BRCT (BRCA1 C-terminal) domains (14, 27). BRCA2 domains are: BRC repeats, helical domain (HD), OB fold binding domains, tower alpha (14, 28). Breast cancer risk regions: LR1, lower risk region in BRCA1, LR2 lower risk region in BRCA2, HR2, higher risk region in BRCA2 (29); BCCR, breast cancer cluster region (14); Ovarian cancer risk regions: OCCR, ovarian cancer cluster region (14).

Distribution and occurrence of pathogenic variants along BRCA1 (A) and BRCA2 (B) in probands in the GEMO study. BRCA1 domains are: RING domain, Coiled Coil domains, BRCT (BRCA1 C-terminal) domains (14, 27). BRCA2 domains are: BRC repeats, helical domain (HD), OB fold binding domains, tower alpha (14, 28). Breast cancer risk regions: LR1, lower risk region in BRCA1, LR2 lower risk region in BRCA2, HR2, higher risk region in BRCA2 (29); BCCR, breast cancer cluster region (14); Ovarian cancer risk regions: OCCR, ovarian cancer cluster region (14).

Representativeness of the GEMO population

The GGC database was designed to compile information on all BRCA1/2 variants (pathogenic, neutral and VUS), except common polymorphisms, identified probands in the 17 French licensed laboratories (20). This database is therefore considered as the reference database for BRCA1/2 variants in France. In June 2018, it contained PV from 6,385 BRCA1 and 4,839 BRCA2 families (Sandrine Caputo, personal communication), and about one third of the population recorded in the GGC database had been enrolled in GEMO. The distribution of PVs along the genes sequence in GEMO and the GGC BRCA1/2 database overlaps (Supplementary Table 2), although a few variants were under-represented in GEMO reflecting a recruitment bias in the study due to the absence of participating cancer clinics in some regions (e.g., BRCA1:c.5260G>T is identified mostly in families from Western France). Other differences can be attributable to a different dynamics between the GEMO and the national registry (some PVs observed in GEMO had not been yet recorded in the GGC database).

Discussion

Over 5,300 participants have been enrolled in GEMO to date, which provides an overview of BRCA1/2 PVs in a well-characterized sample of French counseled HBOC families. The GEMO resource is available to internal and external researchers who can apply for blood DNA and data for use in ethically approved, peer reviewed collaborative and interdisciplinary projects on the genetic epidemiology of cancer in BRCA1/2 families. Its overall goal is to facilitate the translation of research results to the clinical setting. As an example, GEMO contributes massively to the CIMBA effort involving centers on six continents that have recruited BRCA1/2 PV carriers with associated clinical, risk factors, and genetic data (24). GEMO is one of the three most important contributors to CIMBA projects in terms of number of samples, phenotypic and pathology data. In total, 2,868 subjects (53.9% of the GEMO population) had been genotyped using the iCOGS and/or the Oncoarray chips in the context of large-scale GWAS (35, 36). In brief, these international initiatives led to the identification of 26 and 16 SNPs associated with BC risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 PV carriers respectively, and the corresponding numbers for OC risk are 11 and 13 (15). The combined effect of these SNPs, modeled as Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) is currently being investigated to improve individualized cancer risk predictions. Other goals of the Consortium are to precise age-specific cancer risk estimates considering position and functional effects of the PV, family history of cancer and genetic and lifestyle/hormonal modifier risk factors in order to integrate findings on SNPs into the genetic counseling process. GEMO study collaborators co-authored 43 CIMBA publications. Publications and summary results for iCOGS SNPs are accessible via http://cimba.ccge.medschl.cam.ac.uk/. At the national level, the GEMO group is aiming to develop specific PRS in the French counseled families in order to assess the clinical utility of incorporating such scores in risk prediction models. Indeed, improvement in the performance of such models for risk stratification and personalized decision-making (e.g., prophylactic mastectomy/salphingo-oophorectomy or frequency of BC screening) has important clinical implications. Efforts are also being made to render the GEMO database interoperable with other national databases including that of GENEPSO, which is a prospective cohort initiated in 1999, where BRCA1/2 PV carriers are followed over time to observed prospectively characteristics of subjects who develop either primary or secondary cancers (5). To date, about 1,400 individuals have been enrolled in both GEMO and GENEPSO. Clinical management of healthy women with a BRCA1/2 PV involves a combination of frequent screening, especially of the breasts, risk-reducing surgeries and possibly chemoprevention (37). For these women, important decisions include whether or not to undergo preventive mastectomy and the age at which to undergo risk-reducing salphingo-oophorectomy. These choices are invasive, have substantial side effects, and are associated with adverse psychological effects (38). It is therefore important to have precise estimates of associated age-specific cancer risks to provide optimal advices to women carrying a PV. Hence, women at particularly high risk or with a high risk of disease at early ages may benefit from early intervention, and women at lower risk may opt to delay surgery or chemoprevention.

Author contributions

FL, FD, SM, and DS-L coordinated the GEMO study. CN, MiL, IM, SF-F, EM-F, PP, LV-B, Y-JB, DL, IC, PB, VM, CD, PG, M-AC-R, SG, VB, LF, BB, CL, and MG-V invited GEMO participants. CH, BB-dP, DV, HS, NM, LB, MéL, FD, and FL managed the DNA samples. NM, LB, MB, FD, FL, MaL, and YJ managed family and clinical data. NM, LB, MéL, FD, YJ, SMC, and FL curated the variants databases. FL and YJ analyzed the data. FL and NA wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  38 in total

1.  Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.

Authors:  D Ford; D F Easton; M Stratton; S Narod; D Goldgar; P Devilee; D T Bishop; B Weber; G Lenoir; J Chang-Claude; H Sobol; M D Teare; J Struewing; A Arason; S Scherneck; J Peto; T R Rebbeck; P Tonin; S Neuhausen; R Barkardottir; J Eyfjord; H Lynch; B A Ponder; S A Gayther; M Zelada-Hedman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  ENIGMA--evidence-based network for the interpretation of germline mutant alleles: an international initiative to evaluate risk and clinical significance associated with sequence variation in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes.

Authors:  Amanda B Spurdle; Sue Healey; Andrew Devereau; Frans B L Hogervorst; Alvaro N A Monteiro; Katherine L Nathanson; Paolo Radice; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Sean Tavtigian; Barbara Wappenschmidt; Fergus J Couch; David E Goldgar
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.878

3.  Variation in cancer risks, by mutation position, in BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  D Thompson; D Easton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Breast Cancer Risk Associated with Estrogen Exposure and Truncating Mutation Location in BRCA1/2 Carriers.

Authors:  Julie Lecarpentier; Catherine Noguès; Emmanuelle Mouret-Fourme; Bruno Buecher; Marion Gauthier-Villars; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Valérie Bonadona; Jean-Pierre Fricker; Pascaline Berthet; Olivier Caron; Isabelle Coupier; Pascal Pujol; Laurence Faivre; Paul Gesta; François Eisinger; Véronique Mari; Laurence Gladieff; Alain Lortholary; Elisabeth Luporsi; Dominique Leroux; Laurence Venat-Bouvet; Christine M Maugard; Chrystelle Colas; Julie Tinat; Christine Lasset; Nadine Andrieu
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 5.  A guide for functional analysis of BRCA1 variants of uncertain significance.

Authors:  Gaël A Millot; Marcelo A Carvalho; Sandrine M Caputo; Maaike P G Vreeswijk; Melissa A Brown; Michelle Webb; Etienne Rouleau; Susan L Neuhausen; Thomas v O Hansen; Alvaro Galli; Rita D Brandão; Marinus J Blok; Aneliya Velkova; Fergus J Couch; Alvaro N A Monteiro
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 4.878

6.  BRCA2 function in DNA binding and recombination from a BRCA2-DSS1-ssDNA structure.

Authors:  Haijuan Yang; Philip D Jeffrey; Julie Miller; Elspeth Kinnucan; Yutong Sun; Nicolas H Thoma; Ning Zheng; Phang-Lang Chen; Wen-Hwa Lee; Nikola P Pavletich
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-09-13       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Genome-wide association study in BRCA1 mutation carriers identifies novel loci associated with breast and ovarian cancer risk.

Authors:  Fergus J Couch; Xianshu Wang; Lesley McGuffog; Andrew Lee; Curtis Olswold; Karoline B Kuchenbaecker; Penny Soucy; Zachary Fredericksen; Daniel Barrowdale; Joe Dennis; Mia M Gaudet; Ed Dicks; Matthew Kosel; Sue Healey; Olga M Sinilnikova; Adam Lee; François Bacot; Daniel Vincent; Frans B L Hogervorst; Susan Peock; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Anna Jakubowska; Paolo Radice; Rita Katharina Schmutzler; Susan M Domchek; Marion Piedmonte; Christian F Singer; Eitan Friedman; Mads Thomassen; Thomas V O Hansen; Susan L Neuhausen; Csilla I Szabo; Ignacio Blanco; Mark H Greene; Beth Y Karlan; Judy Garber; Catherine M Phelan; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Marco Montagna; Edith Olah; Irene L Andrulis; Andrew K Godwin; Drakoulis Yannoukakos; David E Goldgar; Trinidad Caldes; Heli Nevanlinna; Ana Osorio; Mary Beth Terry; Mary B Daly; Elizabeth J van Rensburg; Ute Hamann; Susan J Ramus; Amanda Ewart Toland; Maria A Caligo; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Nadine Tung; Kathleen Claes; Mary S Beattie; Melissa C Southey; Evgeny N Imyanitov; Marc Tischkowitz; Ramunas Janavicius; Esther M John; Ava Kwong; Orland Diez; Judith Balmaña; Rosa B Barkardottir; Banu K Arun; Gad Rennert; Soo-Hwang Teo; Patricia A Ganz; Ian Campbell; Annemarie H van der Hout; Carolien H M van Deurzen; Caroline Seynaeve; Encarna B Gómez Garcia; Flora E van Leeuwen; Hanne E J Meijers-Heijboer; Johannes J P Gille; Margreet G E M Ausems; Marinus J Blok; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; Matti A Rookus; Peter Devilee; Senno Verhoef; Theo A M van Os; Juul T Wijnen; Debra Frost; Steve Ellis; Elena Fineberg; Radka Platte; D Gareth Evans; Louise Izatt; Rosalind A Eeles; Julian Adlard; Diana M Eccles; Jackie Cook; Carole Brewer; Fiona Douglas; Shirley Hodgson; Patrick J Morrison; Lucy E Side; Alan Donaldson; Catherine Houghton; Mark T Rogers; Huw Dorkins; Jacqueline Eason; Helen Gregory; Emma McCann; Alex Murray; Alain Calender; Agnès Hardouin; Pascaline Berthet; Capucine Delnatte; Catherine Nogues; Christine Lasset; Claude Houdayer; Dominique Leroux; Etienne Rouleau; Fabienne Prieur; Francesca Damiola; Hagay Sobol; Isabelle Coupier; Laurence Venat-Bouvet; Laurent Castera; Marion Gauthier-Villars; Mélanie Léoné; Pascal Pujol; Sylvie Mazoyer; Yves-Jean Bignon; Elżbieta Złowocka-Perłowska; Jacek Gronwald; Jan Lubinski; Katarzyna Durda; Katarzyna Jaworska; Tomasz Huzarski; Amanda B Spurdle; Alessandra Viel; Bernard Peissel; Bernardo Bonanni; Giulia Melloni; Laura Ottini; Laura Papi; Liliana Varesco; Maria Grazia Tibiletti; Paolo Peterlongo; Sara Volorio; Siranoush Manoukian; Valeria Pensotti; Norbert Arnold; Christoph Engel; Helmut Deissler; Dorothea Gadzicki; Andrea Gehrig; Karin Kast; Kerstin Rhiem; Alfons Meindl; Dieter Niederacher; Nina Ditsch; Hansjoerg Plendl; Sabine Preisler-Adams; Stefanie Engert; Christian Sutter; Raymonda Varon-Mateeva; Barbara Wappenschmidt; Bernhard H F Weber; Brita Arver; Marie Stenmark-Askmalm; Niklas Loman; Richard Rosenquist; Zakaria Einbeigi; Katherine L Nathanson; Timothy R Rebbeck; Stephanie V Blank; David E Cohn; Gustavo C Rodriguez; Laurie Small; Michael Friedlander; Victoria L Bae-Jump; Anneliese Fink-Retter; Christine Rappaport; Daphne Gschwantler-Kaulich; Georg Pfeiler; Muy-Kheng Tea; Noralane M Lindor; Bella Kaufman; Shani Shimon Paluch; Yael Laitman; Anne-Bine Skytte; Anne-Marie Gerdes; Inge Sokilde Pedersen; Sanne Traasdahl Moeller; Torben A Kruse; Uffe Birk Jensen; Joseph Vijai; Kara Sarrel; Mark Robson; Noah Kauff; Anna Marie Mulligan; Gord Glendon; Hilmi Ozcelik; Bent Ejlertsen; Finn C Nielsen; Lars Jønson; Mette K Andersen; Yuan Chun Ding; Linda Steele; Lenka Foretova; Alex Teulé; Conxi Lazaro; Joan Brunet; Miquel Angel Pujana; Phuong L Mai; Jennifer T Loud; Christine Walsh; Jenny Lester; Sandra Orsulic; Steven A Narod; Josef Herzog; Sharon R Sand; Silvia Tognazzo; Simona Agata; Tibor Vaszko; Joellen Weaver; Alexandra V Stavropoulou; Saundra S Buys; Atocha Romero; Miguel de la Hoya; Kristiina Aittomäki; Taru A Muranen; Mercedes Duran; Wendy K Chung; Adriana Lasa; Cecilia M Dorfling; Alexander Miron; Javier Benitez; Leigha Senter; Dezheng Huo; Salina B Chan; Anna P Sokolenko; Jocelyne Chiquette; Laima Tihomirova; Tara M Friebel; Bjarni A Agnarsson; Karen H Lu; Flavio Lejbkowicz; Paul A James; Per Hall; Alison M Dunning; Daniel Tessier; Julie Cunningham; Susan L Slager; Chen Wang; Steven Hart; Kristen Stevens; Jacques Simard; Tomi Pastinen; Vernon S Pankratz; Kenneth Offit; Douglas F Easton; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Antonis C Antoniou
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Identification of a BRCA2-specific modifier locus at 6p24 related to breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Mia M Gaudet; Karoline B Kuchenbaecker; Joseph Vijai; Robert J Klein; Tomas Kirchhoff; Lesley McGuffog; Daniel Barrowdale; Alison M Dunning; Andrew Lee; Joe Dennis; Sue Healey; Ed Dicks; Penny Soucy; Olga M Sinilnikova; Vernon S Pankratz; Xianshu Wang; Ronald C Eldridge; Daniel C Tessier; Daniel Vincent; Francois Bacot; Frans B L Hogervorst; Susan Peock; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Paolo Peterlongo; Rita K Schmutzler; Katherine L Nathanson; Marion Piedmonte; Christian F Singer; Mads Thomassen; Thomas v O Hansen; Susan L Neuhausen; Ignacio Blanco; Mark H Greene; Judith Garber; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Irene L Andrulis; David E Goldgar; Emma D'Andrea; Trinidad Caldes; Heli Nevanlinna; Ana Osorio; Elizabeth J van Rensburg; Adalgeir Arason; Gad Rennert; Ans M W van den Ouweland; Annemarie H van der Hout; Carolien M Kets; Cora M Aalfs; Juul T Wijnen; Margreet G E M Ausems; Debra Frost; Steve Ellis; Elena Fineberg; Radka Platte; D Gareth Evans; Chris Jacobs; Julian Adlard; Marc Tischkowitz; Mary E Porteous; Francesca Damiola; Lisa Golmard; Laure Barjhoux; Michel Longy; Muriel Belotti; Sandra Fert Ferrer; Sylvie Mazoyer; Amanda B Spurdle; Siranoush Manoukian; Monica Barile; Maurizio Genuardi; Norbert Arnold; Alfons Meindl; Christian Sutter; Barbara Wappenschmidt; Susan M Domchek; Georg Pfeiler; Eitan Friedman; Uffe Birk Jensen; Mark Robson; Sohela Shah; Conxi Lazaro; Phuong L Mai; Javier Benitez; Melissa C Southey; Marjanka K Schmidt; Peter A Fasching; Julian Peto; Manjeet K Humphreys; Qin Wang; Kyriaki Michailidou; Elinor J Sawyer; Barbara Burwinkel; Pascal Guénel; Stig E Bojesen; Roger L Milne; Hermann Brenner; Magdalena Lochmann; Kristiina Aittomäki; Thilo Dörk; Sara Margolin; Arto Mannermaa; Diether Lambrechts; Jenny Chang-Claude; Paolo Radice; Graham G Giles; Christopher A Haiman; Robert Winqvist; Peter Devillee; Montserrat García-Closas; Nils Schoof; Maartje J Hooning; Angela Cox; Paul D P Pharoah; Anna Jakubowska; Nick Orr; Anna González-Neira; Guillermo Pita; M Rosario Alonso; Per Hall; Fergus J Couch; Jacques Simard; David Altshuler; Douglas F Easton; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Antonis C Antoniou; Kenneth Offit
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Variation in breast cancer risk associated with factors related to pregnancies according to truncating mutation location, in the French National BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations carrier cohort (GENEPSO).

Authors:  Julie Lecarpentier; Catherine Noguès; Emmanuelle Mouret-Fourme; Marion Gauthier-Villars; Christine Lasset; Jean-Pierre Fricker; Olivier Caron; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Pascaline Berthet; Laurence Faivre; Valérie Bonadona; Bruno Buecher; Isabelle Coupier; Laurence Gladieff; Paul Gesta; François Eisinger; Marc Frénay; Elisabeth Luporsi; Alain Lortholary; Chrystelle Colas; Catherine Dugast; Michel Longy; Pascal Pujol; Julie Tinat; Rosette Lidereau; Nadine Andrieu
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Description and analysis of genetic variants in French hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families recorded in the UMD-BRCA1/BRCA2 databases.

Authors:  Sandrine Caputo; Louisa Benboudjema; Olga Sinilnikova; Etienne Rouleau; Christophe Béroud; Rosette Lidereau
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  5 in total

1.  Classification of 101 BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance by cosegregation study: A powerful approach.

Authors:  Sandrine M Caputo; Lisa Golmard; Mélanie Léone; Francesca Damiola; Marine Guillaud-Bataille; Françoise Revillion; Etienne Rouleau; Nicolas Derive; Adrien Buisson; Noémie Basset; Mathias Schwartz; Paul Vilquin; Celine Garrec; Maud Privat; Mathilde Gay-Bellile; Caroline Abadie; Khadija Abidallah; Fabrice Airaud; Anne-Sophie Allary; Emmanuelle Barouk-Simonet; Muriel Belotti; Charlotte Benigni; Patrick R Benusiglio; Christelle Berthemin; Pascaline Berthet; Ophelie Bertrand; Stéphane Bézieau; Marie Bidart; Yves-Jean Bignon; Anne-Marie Birot; Maud Blanluet; Amelie Bloucard; Johny Bombled; Valerie Bonadona; Françoise Bonnet; Marie-Noëlle Bonnet-Dupeyron; Manon Boulaire; Flavie Boulouard; Ahmed Bouras; Violaine Bourdon; Afane Brahimi; Fanny Brayotel; Brigitte Bressac de Paillerets; Noémie Bronnec; Virginie Bubien; Bruno Buecher; Odile Cabaret; Jennifer Carriere; Jean Chiesa; Stephanie Chieze-Valéro; Camille Cohen; Odile Cohen-Haguenauer; Chrystelle Colas; Marie-Agnès Collonge-Rame; Anne-Laure Conoy; Florence Coulet; Isabelle Coupier; Louise Crivelli; Véronica Cusin; Antoine De Pauw; Catherine Dehainault; Hélène Delhomelle; Capucine Delnatte; Sophie Demontety; Philippe Denizeau; Pierre Devulder; Helene Dreyfus; Catherine Dubois d'Enghein; Anaïs Dupré; Anne Durlach; Sophie Dussart; Anne Fajac; Samira Fekairi; Sandra Fert-Ferrer; Alice Fiévet; Robin Fouillet; Emmanuelle Mouret-Fourme; Marion Gauthier-Villars; Paul Gesta; Sophie Giraud; Laurence Gladieff; Veronica Goldbarg; Vincent Goussot; Virginie Guibert; Erell Guillerm; Christophe Guy; Agnès Hardouin; Céline Heude; Claude Houdayer; Olivier Ingster; Caroline Jacquot-Sawka; Natalie Jones; Sophie Krieger; Sofiane Lacoste; Hakima Lallaoui; Helene Larbre; Anthony Laugé; Gabrielle Le Guyadec; Marine Le Mentec; Caroline Lecerf; Jessica Le Gall; Bérengère Legendre; Clémentine Legrand; Angélina Legros; Sophie Lejeune; Rosette Lidereau; Norbert Lignon; Jean-Marc Limacher; Sarab Lizard; Michel Longy; Alain Lortholary; Pierre Macquere; Audrey Mailliez; Sarah Malsa; Henri Margot; Véronique Mari; Christine Maugard; Cindy Meira; Julie Menjard; Diane Molière; Virginie Moncoutier; Jessica Moretta-Serra; Etienne Muller; Zoe Nevière; Thien-Vu Nguyen Minh Tuan; Tetsuro Noguchi; Catherine Noguès; Florine Oca; Cornel Popovici; Fabienne Prieur; Sabine Raad; Jean-Marc Rey; Agathe Ricou; Lucie Salle; Claire Saule; Nicolas Sevenet; Fatoumata Simaga; Hagay Sobol; Voreak Suybeng; Isabelle Tennevet; Henrique Tenreiro; Julie Tinat; Christine Toulas; Isabelle Turbiez; Nancy Uhrhammer; Pierre Vande Perre; Dominique Vaur; Laurence Venat; Nicolas Viellard; Marie-Charlotte Villy; Mathilde Warcoin; Alice Yvard; Helene Zattara; Olivier Caron; Christine Lasset; Audrey Remenieras; Nadia Boutry-Kryza; Laurent Castéra; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  Germline Missense Variants in BRCA1: New Trends and Challenges for Clinical Annotation.

Authors:  Volha A Golubeva; Thales C Nepomuceno; Alvaro N A Monteiro
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 3.  HRness in Breast and Ovarian Cancers.

Authors:  Elizabeth Santana Dos Santos; François Lallemand; Ambre Petitalot; Sandrine M Caputo; Etienne Rouleau
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  A new hybrid record linkage process to make epidemiological databases interoperable: application to the GEMO and GENEPSO studies involving BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Chloé-Agathe Azencott; Maïté Laurent; Catherine Noguès; Nadine Andrieu; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Yue Jiao; Fabienne Lesueur; Noura Mebirouk; Lilian Laborde; Juana Beauvallet; Marie-Gabrielle Dondon; Séverine Eon-Marchais; Anthony Laugé; Sandrine M Caputo
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  No Association of Early-Onset Breast or Ovarian Cancer with Early-Onset Cancer in Relatives in BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation Families.

Authors:  Marion Imbert-Bouteille; Carole Corsini; Marie-Christine Picot; Lucas Mizrahy; Sandrine Akouete; Helena Huguet; Frédéric Thomas; David Geneviève; Patrice Taourel; Marc Ychou; Virginie Galibert; Chloé Rideau; Karen Baudry; Tatiana Kogut Kubiak; Isabelle Coupier; Rémy Hobeika; Yvette Macary; Alain Toledano; Jérôme Solassol; Antoine Maalouf; Jean-Pierre Daures; Pascal Pujol
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 4.096

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.