| Literature DB >> 30429865 |
Jesús Julio Camarero1, Flor Álvarez-Taboada2, Andrea Hevia3,4, Fernando Castedo-Dorado2.
Abstract
Drought stress causes a reduction in tree growth and forest productivity, which could be aggravated by climate warming and defoliation due to moth outbreaks. We investigate how European gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar dispar L., Lepidoptera: Erebidae) outbreak and related climate conditions affected growth and wood features in host and non-host tree species in north-western Spain. There, radiata pine (Pinus radiata D. Don) plantations and chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) stands were defoliated by the moth larvae, whereas Maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) was not defoliated. The gypsy moth outbreak peaked in 2012 and 2013, and it was preceded by very warm spring conditions in 2011 and a dry-warm 2011-2012 winter. Using dendrochronology we compared growth responses to climate and defoliation of host species (radiata pine, chestnut) with the non-host species (Maritime pine). We also analyzed wood density derived from X-ray densitometry in defoliated and non-defoliated trees of radiata pine. We aimed to: (i) disentangle the relative effects of defoliation and climate stress on radial growth, and (ii) characterize defoliated trees of radiata pine according to their wood features (ring-width, maximum and minimum density). Radial growth during the outbreak (2012-2013) decreased on average 74% in defoliated (>50% of leaf area removed) trees of radiata pine, 43% in defoliated trees of chestnut, and 4% in non-defoliated trees of Maritime pine. After applying a BACI (Before-After-Control-Impact) type analysis, we concluded that the difference in the pattern of radial growth before and during the defoliation event was more likely due to the differences in climate between these two periods. Radiata pines produced abundant latewood intra-annual density fluctuations in 2006 and 2009 in response to wet summer conditions, suggesting a high climatic responsiveness. Minimum wood density was lower in defoliated than in non-defoliated trees of radiata pine prior to the outbreak, but increased during the outbreak. The pre-outbreak difference in minimum wood density suggests that the trees most affected by the outbreak produced tracheids with wider lumen and were more susceptible to drought stress. Results of this study illustrate (i) that the pattern of radial growth alone may be not a good indicator for reconstructing past defoliation events and (ii) that wood variables are reliable indicators for assessing the susceptibility of radiata pine to defoliation by the gypsy moth.Entities:
Keywords: Castanea sativa; Lymantria dispar dispar; Pinus radiata; defoliation; dendroecology; extreme climate event; intra-annual density fluctuation; wood density
Year: 2018 PMID: 30429865 PMCID: PMC6220356 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01582
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1Some illustrative views of the defoliation caused by the gypsy moth outbreak in the studied area (Cubillos del Sil, north-western Spain). (a) Landscape view of radiata pine affected plantations, (b) defoliated radiata pine trees and chestnut stands, and (c) defoliated radiata pines surrounding a Maritime pine not affected by defoliation.
Size (diameter at breast height, dbh) and radial-growth data (basal area increment, BAI) measured for the sampled tree species.
| Defol | 18 | 21.3 | 16.4 | 18.7 | 1.8 | 20.49 | 4.61 | 13.11a | 1.20 | 10.43 | 1.26 | 2.95a | 0.87 | |
| Non-defol | 28 | 24.6 | 18.2 | 21.0 | 2.1 | 21.64 | 5.48 | 16.89b | 1.28 | 28.45 | 1.52 | 11.28b | 2.32 | |
| Defol | 11 | 20.5 | 16.7 | 18.4 | 0.4 | 14.09 | 6.11 | 9.71a | 1.40 | 12.66 | 5.92 | 8.96a | 0.43 | |
| Non-defol | 10 | 20.0 | 16.9 | 18.2 | 0.3 | 14.56 | 7.07 | 10.11a | 1.44 | 25.06 | 7.63 | 15.66b | 0.55 | |
| Non-defol | 13 | 32.2 | 24.9 | 28.5 | 2.6 | 42.41 | 7.99 | 20.21 | 1.21 | 38.51 | 1.84 | 19.39 | 4.29 | |
Basal area increment was calculated for the period previous to defoliation (2000–2011) and for the outbreak period (2012–2013). Different letters indicate significant BAI differences (α = 0.05) between defoliation classes (defoliated –Defol–, and non-defoliated –Non-defol) within each species (radiata pine and chestnut) based on Mann-Whitney U-tests. Values are means, maximum (Max), and minimum (Min) values, and standard errors (SE).
Figure 2Number of living or dead radiata pine trees according to their last formed tree-ring (left y axis) or according to the presence of intra-annual density fluctuations (IADF) in the latewood (right y axis). The insets show density profiles and images corresponding to the 2006 and 2009 rings when latewood IADFs were abundant. Dead pines died during the gypsy moth outbreak.
Figure 3Growth patterns (basal area increment) of the three studied tree species and considering defoliated and non-defoliated trees due to the gypsy moth outbreak in the case of chestnut and radiata pine. Values are means ± SE.
Figure 4Maximum and minimum wood density of defoliated and non-defoliated radiata pines. Values are means ± SE.
Figure 5Climate-growth relationships calculated by relating monthly or seasonal climatic variables [(A), mean maximum temperatures; (B), mean minimum temperatures; (C), precipitation] with the mean series of ring-width indices of the three study species (chestnut, radiata pine, maritime pine). The dashed and dotted horizontal lines correspond to the 0.05 and 0.01 significance levels, respectively. Months or seasons abbreviated by lowercase or uppercase letters correspond to the previous and current years, respectively.
Parameter estimates and their corresponding P-values of the best linear mixed-effects models fitted to annual basal area increment (BAI) for Pinus radiata, Pinus pinaster and Castanae sativa.
| Intercept | 34.69 | <0.0001 | 37.14 | <0.0001 | – | – |
| Tmin autumnt−1 | −3.562 | <0.0001 | −3.813 | <0.0001 | – | – |
| Tmax spring | – | – | – | – | 0.07918 | <0.0001 |
| Defoliation | −0.3825 | 0.02 | – | – | −0.06078 | 0.91 |
| Period | −28.26 | <0.0001 | −30.40 | <0.0001 | 0.3110 | 0.007 |
| Tmin autumnt−1 × Period | 3.624 | <0.0001 | 3.885 | <0.0001 | – | – |
| Phi | 0.85 | 0.89 | – | |||
For Castanea sativa the parameter estimates and P-values come from fitting a linear mixed-effects model using each covariate or factor one at a time. Phi is the autocorrelation parameter for the AR(1) error structure.
Values of the Moran's I index values used to test for the presence of spatial autocorrelation in growth data (BAI, basal area increment).
| 0.0668 | 0.7112 | 0.48 | 0.1900 | 1.5792 | 0.11 | |
| −0.0984 | −0.2910 | 0.77 | 0.1239 | 1.0792 | 0.28 | |
| −0.2358 | −1.4302 | 0.15 | −0.2022 | −1.1159 | 0.26 | |
Z scores and P-values evaluate the significance of the index. Analysis was carried out for the period previous to defoliation (2000–2011) and for the outbreak period (2012–2013).