| Literature DB >> 30429794 |
Markus U Wagenhäuser1,2,3, Isabel N Schellinger4,5,6, Takuya Yoshino1,2, Kensuke Toyama1,2, Yosuke Kayama1,2, Alicia Deng1,2, Sabina P Guenther7,8, Anne Petzold4, Joscha Mulorz1,2,3, Pireyatharsheny Mulorz1,2, Gerd Hasenfuß5, Wiebke Ibing3, Margitta Elvers3, Andreas Schuster4,5,9, Anand K Ramasubramanian10, Matti Adam1,2, Hubert Schelzig3, Joshua M Spin1,2, Uwe Raaz4,5, Philip S Tsao1,2.
Abstract
Aim: Arterial stiffness is a significant risk factor for many cardiovascular diseases, including abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Nicotine, the major active ingredient of e-cigarettes and tobacco smoke, induces acute vasomotor effects that may temporarily increase arterial stiffness. Here, we investigated the effects of long-term nicotine exposure on structural aortic stiffness.Entities:
Keywords: AAA; e-cigarettes; mouse model; nicotine; segmentation; stiffness
Year: 2018 PMID: 30429794 PMCID: PMC6220086 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01459
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
FIGURE 1Structural aortic stiffness is increased in nicotine-infused mice. (A) Pulse wave velocity (PWV) measurements in nicotine-treated and PBS control mice. (n = 4–6 mice/group); ∗p < 0.05 vs. PBS control or day 10 vs. day 40, respectively; values are mean ± SEM. (B) Passive pressure-strain curves derived from pressure myography of the thoracic aortic segment (TS) in nicotine-treated and PBS control mice 10 and 40 days after pump implantation. (n = 5–9 mice/group at day 10 and 4–7 mice/group at day 40); ∗p < 0.05 for area under the curve (AUC) vs. corresponding PBS control at day 10 and day 40, respectively; values are mean ± SEM. (C) Passive pressure-strain curves derived from pressure myography of the abdominal aortic segment (AS) in nicotine-treated and PBS control mice 10 and 40 days after pump implantation. (n = 5–9 mice/group at day 10 and 4–7 mice/group at day 40); ∗p < 0.05 for AUC vs. corresponding PBS control at day 10 and day 40, respectively; values are mean ± SEM. (A–C) Two-way ANOVA with Holm–Sidak’s multiple comparison test.
FIGURE 2Segmental aortic stiffness is increased after nicotine infusion. (A) Pressure myography indicates similar global stiffness between the thoracic (TS) and the abdominal (AS) aortic segment for PBS control mice 10 days after pump implantation [equal area under the curve (AUC)]. (n = 5 mice/group); values are mean ± SEM. (B) Pressure myography indicates a significant stiffness gradient (difference for AUC) between the TS and the AS in nicotine-treated mice 10 days after pump implantation (n = 9 mice/group); ∗p < 0.05 AS vs. TS; values are mean ± SEM. (C) Pressure myography indicates similar global stiffness between the TS and the AS for PBS control mice 40 days after pump implantation. (n = 4–5 mice/group) (equal AUC); values are mean ± SEM. (D) Pressure myography indicates a significant stiffness gradient (difference for AUC) between the TS and the AS for nicotine-treaded mice 40 days after pump implantation. (n = 6–7 mice/group); ∗p < 0.05; values are mean ± SEM. (A–D) Two-way ANOVA with Holm–Sidak’s multiple comparison test.
FIGURE 3Nicotine infusion induces aortic elastin fragmentation. (A–D) Representative images of thoracic (A,C) and abdominal (B,D) aortic sections taken from mice treated with PBS (A,B) or nicotine (C,D) and stained with modified Elastin Verhoeff’s Van Gieson (VVG). Green arrows indicate locations of elastin fragmentation. Original magnification 200×, scale bar 100 μm. (E) Quantification of medial lamellar units (MLUs) of thoracic and abdominal aortic segments from PBS-treated control mice 40 days after pump implantation (the mean was calculated from 4 high-power fields/aorta, n = 3 different aortas per group). ∗p < 0.05 AS vs. TS, values are mean ± SEM; Student’s t-test. (F) Elastin fragmentation index 40 days after pump implantation (the mean was calculated from 3 high-power fields/aorta, n = 5 different aortas per group). ∗p < 0.05 vs. respective PBS control; values are mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA with Holm–Sidak’s multiple comparison test.
FIGURE 4Nicotine treatment induces MMP-2 and MMP-9 gene and protein expression resulting in increased MMP activity. (A,B) mRNA expression levels of MMP-2 and MMP-9 are upregulated in the thoracic (TS) and the abdominal aortic segment (AS) after nicotine treatment. (n = 5 mice/group); ∗p < 0.05 vs. respective PBS control; values are mean ± SEM. (C,D) Representative images of aortic sections stained for MMP-2 (C) and MMP-9 (D). Strong red fluorescence (MMP-2/-9) indicates protein up-regulation in nicotine-treated mice aortae. Original magnification 200×, scale bar 100 μm. (E,F) Quantification of MMP-2 (E) and MMP-9 (F) protein expression level in the aortic wall based on red fluorescence in sections taken from AS and TS of nicotine-treated and PBS control mice 40 days after pump implantation (the mean was calculated from 3 high-power fields/aorta, n = 5 different aortas per group). ∗p < 0.05 vs. respective PBS control; values are mean ± SEM. (G) Representative images of aortic zymography of TS and the AS taken from nicotine-treated or PBS control mice. Green–blue fluorescence indicates regions of active MMPs (white arrows). Original magnification 200×, scale bar 100 μm. (H) Quantification of MMP activity based on green–blue fluorescence in zymography images taken from AS and TS of nicotine-treated and PBS control mice 40 days after pump implantation (the mean was calculated from 3 high-power fields/aorta, n = 5 different aortas per group). ∗p < 0.05 vs. respective PBS control; values are mean ± SEM. (A,B,E,F,H) One-way ANOVA with Holm–Sidak’s multiple comparison test.
FIGURE 5MMP inhibition via SB-3CT prevents aortic wall remodeling and stiffening in nicotine-treated mice. (A) PWV for nicotine-treated mice ± additional SB-3CT administration (n = 4–8 mice/group); ∗p < 0.05 vs. nicotine; values are mean ± SEM. (B,C) Pressure-strain curves for the thoracic (TS) (B) and the abdominal (C) aortic segment (AS) from nicotine-infused mice ± SB-3CT administration 40 days after pump implantation (4–7 mice/group); ∗p < 0.05 area under the curve (AUC) nicotine vs. AUC nicotine + SB-3CT; values are mean ± SEM. (D) Representative images of aortic zymography of the TS taken from nicotine-treated ± SB-3CT administrated mice. Green–blue fluorescence indicates regions of active MMPs (white arrows). Original magnification 200×, scale bar 100 μm. (E) Quantification of MMP activity based on green–blue fluorescence intensity in zymography images taken from nicotine-treated ± SB-3CT administrated mice 40 days after pump implantation (the mean was calculated from 3 high-power fields/aorta, n = 5 different aortas per group); ∗p < 0.05 nicotine vs. nicotine + SB-3CT; values are mean ± SEM. (F) Representative images of thoracic aortic sections from nicotine ± SB-3CT-treated mice stained with Elastica van-Giesson (EvG). Green arrows indicate locations of elastin fragmentation. Original magnification 200×, scale bar 100 μm. (G) Elastin fragmentation index (the mean was calculated from 3 high-power fields/aorta, n = 5 different aortas per group). ∗p < 0.05 nicotine vs. nicotine + SB-3CT; values are mean ± SEM. (E,G) One-way ANOVA with Holm–Sidak’s multiple comparison test.