Literature DB >> 30429104

How community pharmacists prioritize cognitive pharmaceutical services.

Jeroen M van de Pol1, Ellen S Koster2, Anke M Hövels2, Marcel L Bouvy3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There is broad consensus that community pharmacists should focus on the provision of pharmaceutical care. Studies, however, have shown that community pharmacists still spend a considerable amount of time on traditional activities such as dispensing instead of cognitive pharmaceutical services (CPS). It is not clear whether community pharmacists prefer their current time-utilization or if they are willing to spend more time on CPS. AIM: The aim of this study was to identify how community pharmacists ideally would prioritize CPS compared to other daily activities.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study design with Q-methodology was used to identify different viewpoints regarding task prioritization. Community pharmacists were asked to rank a total of 48 daily activities. Data was collected online using FlashQ©. Q-sorts were analyzed by principal component factor analysis and varimax rotation using PQmethod 2.35.
RESULTS: In total, 166 community pharmacists participated in this study. Three distinguishing groups were found based on task prioritization explaining 59% of the total variance among respondents. All groups ranked the provision of CPS as important, in differing degrees. Group 1 ranked CPS as most important and was also the group that contained most participants. Group 2 and 3 ranked quality assurance as most important with CPS as second. Logistics and pharmacy management were ranked low by all groups. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION: Community pharmacists rank the provision of CPS as important. So factors, probably other than task prioritization, are keeping the pharmacist from focusing on CPS in daily practice. In other studies, time constraints are mostly mentioned as major barrier. Activities such as logistics and pharmacy management are given less priority and should be delegated to supporting staff members as much as possible, to enable pharmacists to focus their available time on activities they deem important.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive pharmaceutical services; Community pharmacy; Q-methodology; Task prioritization; Time utilization

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30429104     DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm        ISSN: 1551-7411


  4 in total

1.  Community pharmacy cognitive services during the COVID-19 pandemic: A descriptive study of practices, precautions taken, perceived enablers and barriers and burnout.

Authors:  Betul Okuyan; Muhammed Yunus Bektay; Zehra Betul Kingir; Dilsad Save; Mesut Sancar
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 3.149

2.  Examining Attitudes and Beliefs that Inhibit Pharmacist Implementation of a Statewide Opioid Harm Reduction Program.

Authors:  Oliver C Frenzel; Heidi Eukel; Elizabeth Skoy; Amy Werremeyer; Jayme Steig; Mark Strand
Journal:  Innov Pharm       Date:  2020-10-29

3.  Expanded Pharmacy Practice Implementation: Lessons from Remote Practice.

Authors:  Selina Taylor; Alice Cairns; Beverley Glass
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-12

Review 4.  The Community Pharmacist: Perceived Barriers and Patient-Centered Care Communication.

Authors:  Maria Laura Ilardo; Antonio Speciale
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.