| Literature DB >> 30428954 |
K Chaisiri1, C Jollivet2, P Della Rossa2, S Sanguankiat1, D Wattanakulpanich1, C Lajaunie3, A Binot2, M Tanita4, S Rattanapikul4, D Sutdan5, S Morand6, A Ribas7.
Abstract
The present study integrates several aspects of a parasitological survey in a rural community village combining community knowledge of parasites, their potential transmission routes and health risk factors. A rural community located in Northern Thailand was surveyed for intestinal parasites, and an overall prevalence of 45.2% for helminths and 4.8% for protozoan infections was identified. Socio-demographic characteristics, customs and perceptions were compiled using individual questionnaires and interviews for participants surveyed for parasitic screening. The results allowed us to determine the knowledge and perception of local people concerning helminthic infection and transmission. Despite the fact that the participants in this community were aware of parasitic transmission routes, their widespread custom of eating raw fish and meat render the reduction of helminthiasis difficult. A detailed study on the infection of fish-borne parasitic trematodes, the most prevalent helminth, allowed us to determine that the distance from a given household to the river is a determinant of infection intensity. Health education activities organised in the local community resulted in a change in perception of risks associated with parasite transmission.Entities:
Keywords: Fish-borne trematode; Thailand; health education; health risk factors; helminths; participatory mapping; protists
Year: 2018 PMID: 30428954 PMCID: PMC6518572 DOI: 10.1017/S0950268818002996
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Epidemiol Infect ISSN: 0950-2688 Impact factor: 2.451
Demographic and social characteristics of participants to questionnaires and parasitological survey in Huay Muang village
| Variables | Number | Percentage (%) (IC 95%) |
|---|---|---|
| Gender: male/female | 113/115 | 49.6 (43.1–56.1)/50.4 (43.9–57) |
| Age: <30 years | 51 | 22.4 (16.6–28.2) |
| Between 30 and 50 years | 93 | 40.8 (34–47.6) |
| >50 years | 84 | 36.8 (30.5–43.1) |
| Education: no | 73 | 36.9 (30.2–43.6) |
| Yes: primary school | 100 | 50.5 (43.5–57.5) |
| Yes: high school and technical college | 25 | 12.6 (7–17.2) |
| Occupation | ||
| Unemployment | 26 | 13.1 (8.4–17.8) |
| Planter (maize) | 106 | 53.5 (46.6–60.4) |
| Farmer (rice fields) | 32 | 16.2 (11.1–21.3) |
| Others (students, sellers…) | 34 | 17.2 (11.9–22.5) |
| Visit physician if ill: yes/no | 150/48 | 75.8 (69.8–81.8)/24.2 (18.2–30.2) |
| Screening parasites last year: no | 164 | 82.8 (77.5–88.1) |
| Yes with negative results | 22 | 11.1 (6.7–15.5) |
| Yes with positive results | 12 | 6.1 (2.8–9.4) |
| Drink alcohol daily: yes/no | 99/90 | 50.0 (43–57)/50.0 (43–57) |
| Use toilet: yes/no | 152/46 | 76.8 (71–82.7)/23.2 (17.3–29.1) |
| Animals: no | 10 | 5.05 (2–8.1) |
| Yes: pets (cats and dogs) | 21 | 10.6 (6.3–14.9) |
| Yes: livestock (chickens, pigs, cows) | 167 | 84.3 (79.2–89.4) |
Food habits of participants to questionnaires of Huay Muang village
| Food habits | Number | Percentage (%) (IC 95%) |
|---|---|---|
| Raw fish consumption: yes/no | 148/50 | 74.7 (68.6–80.8)/25.3 (19.2–31.4) |
| Wild fish: yes/no | 163/35 | 82.3 (76.9–87.6)/17.7 (12.4–23) |
| Fish from rice fields or ponds: yes/no | 6/192 | 3.03 (0.64–5.4)/97.0 (94.6–99.3) |
| Fish from market: yes/no | 127/71 | 64.1 (57.4–70.8)/35.9 (29.2–42.6) |
| Raw meat consumption: yes/no | 146/52 | 73.7 (67.6–79.8)/26.3 (20.1–32.4) |
| Beef consumption: yes/no | 113/33 | 77.4 (71.6–83.2)/22.6 (16.8–28.4) |
| Buffalo consumption: yes/no | 102/44 | 69.9 (63.5–76.3)/30.1 (23.7–36.5) |
| Pork consumption: yes/no | 137/9 | 93.8 (90.4–97.2)/16.2 (11.1–21.3) |
| Wild animals consumption: yes/no | 68/78 | 46.6 (39.7–53.5)/53.4 (46.5–60.3) |
| Meat supplied by: themselves/neighbours | 121/77 | 61.1 (54.3–67.9)/38.9 (32.1–45.7) |
| Meat from market: yes/no | 173/25 | 87.3 (82.7–91.9)/10.8 (6.5–15.1) |
Local knowledge of different types of parasites and their transmission ways
| Questions | Number | Percentage (%) (IC 95%) |
|---|---|---|
| Do you know this helminth? | ||
| Pinworms: yes/no | 31/167 | 15.7 (10.6–20.8)/84.3 (79.2–89.4) |
| 118/80 | 59.6 (52.8–66.4)/40.4 (33.6–47.2) | |
| Hookworms: yes/no | 44/154 | 22.2 (16.4–28)/77.8 (72–83.6) |
| 31/167 | 15.7 (10.6–20.8)/84.3 (79.2–89.4) | |
| Cestode: yes/no | 141/57 | 71.2 (64.9–77.5)/28.8 (22.5–35.1) |
| Threadworm: yes/no | 86/112 | 43.4 (36.5–50.3)/56.6 (49.7–63.5) |
| 59/139 | 29.8 (23.4–36.2)/70.2 (63.9–76.6) | |
| Do you know that you can be infected when: | ||
| Walking barefoot: yes/no | 127/71 | 64.1 (57.4–70.8)/35.9 (29.2–42.6) |
| Manipulating food with dirty hands: yes/no | 139/59 | 70.2 (63.9–76.6)/29.8 (23.4–36.2) |
| Drinking unfiltered water: yes/no | 126/72 | 63.6 (56.9–70.3)/36.4 (29.7–43.1) |
| There are flies over the food: yes/no | 168/30 | 84.8 (79.8–89.8)/15.2 (10.2–20.2) |
| Consuming raw fish: yes/no | 183/15 | 92.4 (88.7–96.1)/7.6 (3.9–11.3) |
| Consuming raw crab: yes/no | 120/78 | 60.6 (53.8–67.4)/39.4 (32.6–46.2) |
| Consuming raw meat: yes/no | 185/13 | 93.4 (90–96.9)/6.6 (3.1–10.1) |
| Consuming raw bush meat: yes/no | 185/13 | 93.4 (90–96.9) /6.6 (3.1–10.1) |
Fig. 1.Results of the participatory mapping (see ‘Materials and methods’ section) showing the flooding areas and the unhealthy places according to risk perception of water-borne diseases.
Prevalence and intensity of helminths and protists in faecal samples obtained from Huay Muang village
| Intestinal parasites | Pre-treatment/health educational programme | Post-treatment/health educational programme | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min-max (intensity± | Number of infected people | Prevalence in % (CI 95%) | Number of infected people | Prevalence in % (CI 95%) | |
| Helminths | 120 | 45.2 (38.7–51.6) | 10 | 4.4 (2.3–7.8) | |
| Hookworms | 0–12 (0.09±0.29) | 4 | 1.75 (0.05–3.5) | 0 | 0 |
| Fish-borne trematode | 0–503 (8.4±48.2) | 103 | 45.2 (38.7–51.6) | 6 | 2.6 (1.1–5.6) |
| 4 | 1.75 (0.05–3.5) | 0 | 0 | ||
| 21 | 9.21 (5.5–13.0) | 2 | 0.9 (0.1–3.2) | ||
| 11 | 4.82 (2.0–7.6) | 2 | 0.9 (0.1–3.2) | ||
| Protists | 11 | 4.82 (2.0–7.6) | N/A | N/A | |
| 0–4 (0.04±0.89) | 5 | 2.19 (0.3–4.1) | N/A | N/A | |
| 2.19 (0.3–4.1) | N/A | N/A | |||
| 1 | 0.44 (−0.4 to 1.3) | N/A | N/A | ||
| 1 | 0.44 (0.04±0.89) | N/A | N/A | ||
Fig. 2.(a) Principal component analysis of parasites and their distribution among the inhabitants of Huay Muang, with the two first axes of the PCA explaining 31.3% of the variance. (b) Principal component analysis of the socio-demography and perceptions distribution among the inhabitants of Huay Muang, with the two first axes of the PCA explaining 45.9% of the variance. (c) Biplot graph of canonical correspondence analysis showing the association between intestinal parasites in relation to socio-demography (represented by PCA in (a)) and perceptions (represented by PCA in (b)) of Huay Muang villagers, with (d) the distribution of the inhabitants of Huay Muang. Rbm, raw bushmeat; Rmeat, raw meat (pork and beef); Rcrab, raw crab; Rfish, raw fish; water, water filtrated; boots, use of boots; market, food is mainly obtained from the market; ts, food is mainly obtained by the household; bm, consumption of bushmeat; pork, consumption of pork meat; buff, consumption of buffalo meat; beef, consumption of beef meet; nfood, consumption of natural food; toilet, presence of toilets; educ, level of education (from none to technical college); age, age; Strongyl, Strongyloides sp.; Parag, Paragonimus sp.; MIF, fish-borne trematodes.
Fig. 3.(a) Huay Muang map of fish-borne trematodes infection level (EPG) at household level with a size of green circles corresponding to the level of EPG infection for each household (white rectangle corresponds to the kriging area of (b); river in blue); (b) interpolation of fish-borne trematodes infection by kriging in a grid based on geographical coordinates of households with a scale of EPG infection from low infection in yellow to high infection in green.
Identification of risk factors influencing infection of fish-borne trematodes in Huay Muang village
| Variables | Positive number (for a total=194) | Crude odds ratio | Estimated coefficient | Adjusted odds ratio | IC 95% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age; <30 years | 11 | |||||
| Between 30 and 50 years | 40 | 2.4 | 0.23 | 1.26 | (0.40–3.53) | 0.703 |
| More than 50 years | 50 | 10.6 | 1.95 | 7.01 | (2.19–20.3) | 0.0009 |
| Consumption of undercooked fish | 9 | |||||
| Yes | 78 | 11.6 | 2.31 | 10.1 | (3.85–267.0) | < 0.0001 |
| Occupation: unemployed | 13 | |||||
| Rice farmers | 15 | 1.4 | −0.63 | 0.53 | (0.15–1.78) | 0.293 |
| Planters of maize | 55 | 3.8 | 1.05 | 2.85 | (0.9188–78.89) | 0.043 |
| Others | 4 | 0.2 | −0.23 | 0.79 | (0.16–3.61) | 0.780 |
| Screening of parasites previous year: no | 73 | |||||
| Yes, negative | 4 | 0.09 | −3.43 | 0.03 | (0.01–0.13) | < 0.0001 |
| Yes, positive | 10 | 0.42 | −0.73 | 0.48 | (0.14–2.15) | 0.256 |
| Distance to river: >100 m | 15 | |||||
| <60 m | 42 | 16.1 | 2.09 | 8.10 | (3.07–21.2) | < 0.0001 |
| >60 and <100 m | 30 | 7.5 | 1.73 | 5.65 | (2.31–13.4) | <0.0001 |
Comparison of interviewing information from helminth-infected patients before and after receiving health educational activities (extracted from the report of the Primary Care Unit to the Subdistrict Administrative Organization)
| Group | Before implementation | After implementation |
|---|---|---|
| Paragonimiasis patients | Patients usually catch fresh water crabs and shrimps from stream and river for cooking, e.g. grilling, burning, dropping in boiled water or making curry, which may not be properly cooked. They also like to bring shrimps from the fresh water sources to do the traditional raw dishes. | Patients realised that they will be infected by parasites if they consume raw crabs, shrimps, fishes or shellfishes. They will not eat them raw, and they need to be cooked before eating. |
| Fish-borne trematodes-infected patients | Patients like to bring several species of cyprinoid fishes, e.g., Javean barb, Silver barb, Goldfin tinfoil barb and small-scale mud carp to make a raw dish called ‘laab pla’. | Patients say that they better cook fish rather than eat it raw. Proper cooked food is clean and safe. |
| Taeniasis patients | Patients like to eat raw pork or beef. It is also found that those who eat raw meat and are infected with parasites usually do self-medication by taking a dose of deworming drug (Niclosamide) every 6 months. | Patients say that now they do not like eating raw meat but prefer proper-cooked meal instead. |
| In general | Some patients realised the effects of parasites on their health. However, in some situation such as going to work in distant field, they may be willing to take risk, e.g. drinking water from stream or pond; walking barefoot in the field because it is more convenient. Because of personal craving to eat raw fish or meat, just a little bit (not eat much), then they thought that it will not be contaminated by parasites. | Now, villagers are afraid of parasites. So, they are informed and avoid any risk of exposure to parasitic infection, such as eating raw food, drinking water from natural sources without boiling or filtering and not wearing shoes when working in the field. |