| Literature DB >> 30428849 |
Guanhong Li1, Wei Wu2, Xinyao Zhang2, Yuan Huang2, Yubing Wen1, Xuemei Li1, Ruitong Gao3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) is considered to play an important role in the pathogenesis in IgA nephropathy (IgAN). The correlations between serum TNF-α and disease severity in patients with IgAN remain controversial.Entities:
Keywords: Biomarkers; Cytokines; IgA nephropathy; Tumor necrosis factor alpha
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30428849 PMCID: PMC6236996 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-018-1069-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nephrol ISSN: 1471-2369 Impact factor: 2.388
Demographic, clinical and pathological features of patients with IgA nephropathy
| Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| Patients numbers | 147 |
| Cytokines–biopsy time intervala (months) | 27.93 (6.17–63.37) |
| Mean age (yr) | 35 (29–45) |
| Male, n (%) | 71 (48.3) |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 120 (110–130) |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 75 (70–80) |
| Mean arterial pressure (mmHg) | 90 (83–97) |
| Urinary red blood cell (/μL) | 29 (7–79) |
| Urinary protein to serum creatinine ratio (mg/g Cr) | 595 (244–1305) |
| 24-h urine protein excretion (g/24 h) | 0.82 (0.38–1.55) |
| < 0.3 | 27 (18.4%) |
| 0.3–0.99 | 59 (40.1%) |
| 1.0–2.99 | 46 (31.3%) |
| ≥ 3 | 15 (10.2%) |
| Serum creatinine (mg/dL) | 1.07 (0.84–1.39) |
| Serum IgA (g/L) | 2.22 (1.82–3.22) |
| Cystatin C (mg/dL) | 1.06 (0.93–1.57) |
| eGFR (mL/min•1.73m2)b | 79.29 (60.00–104.29) |
| CKD Stagesc, n (%) | |
| 1 | 57 (38.8) |
| 2 | 49 (33.3) |
| 3a | 22 (15.0) |
| 3b | 8 (5.4) |
| 4 | 5 (3.4) |
| 5 | 6 (4.1) |
| Oxford classificationd, n (%) | |
| M0/ M1 | 16(10.9), 131(89.1) |
| E0/E1 | 113(76.9), 34(23.1) |
| S0/S1 | 24(16.3), 123(83.7) |
| T0/T1/T2 | 45(30.6), 65(44.2), 37(44.2) |
| C0/C1/C2 | 66(44.9), 66(44.9), 15(10.2) |
| Medical treatments, n (%) | |
| Untreated | 35 (23.8) |
| Corticosteroids | 71 (48.3) |
| Immunosuppressants | 76 (51.7) |
| ACE-Is/ARBs | 99 (67.3) |
Data are presented as median (interquartile range) or frequency in percent
BP: blood pressure; 1 mmHg = 0.133Kpa; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; ACE-Is: angiotensin converting
enzyme inhibitors; ARBs: angiotensin II receptor blockers. M: mesangial hypercellularity score < 0.5 (M0) or > 0.5 (M1);
E: endocapillary hypercellularity absent (E0) or present (E1); S: segmental glomerulosclerosis absent (S0) or present (S1),
presence or absence of podocyte hypertrophy/tip lesions in biopsy specimens with S1; T: tubular atrophy/interstitial
fibrosis < 25% (T0), 26–50% (T1), or > 50% (T2); C: cellular/fibrocellular crescents absent (C0), present in at least 1
glomerulus (C1), in > 25% of glomeruli (C2)
aTime interval between renal biopsy of patients with IgA nephropathy and sample collection
beGFR was calculated according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation [19]
cCKD stages 1–5 were divided by eGFR≥90 (G1), 60–89 (G2), 45–59 (G3a), 30–44 (G3b), 15–29 (G4), and < 15 (G5) mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively, according to the new KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) classification [20]
dDetermined in accordance with the Oxford classification [5]
Fig. 1Serum levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) between healthy controls (HC) and IgA nephropathy (IgAN) patients. There was a significant difference in serum levels of TNF-α [9.20 (7.70–10.60) pg/mL vs. 6.04 (5.11–7.23) pg/mL, P < 0.0001] between IgAN group (n = 147) and HC group (n = 126). Data are presented as median (interquartile range). Statistically significant differences between IgAN and HC were tested with Mann–Whitney U-test
Fig. 2Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of the prediction values of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) in IgA nephropathy (IgAN) patients. ROC curve revealed that (a) serum TNF-α had better discrimination than (b) eGFR between IgAN patients and healthy subjects [TNF-α: (AUC, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.83–0.91; P < 0.0001) vs. eGFR: (AUC, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.71–0.82; P < 0.0001), P = 0.007]. AUC, area under the curve; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation [19]
Demographic, clinical and pathological features of patients with and without elevated serum TNF-α
| Characteristics | Subgroups | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| TNF-α ≤ 8.1 pg/mL | TNF-α > 8.1 pg/mL | ||
| Patients numbers | 49 | 98 | |
| Cytokines–biopsy time intervala (months) | 25.93 (5.27–55.90) | 28.55 (7.14–67.47) | 0.63 |
| Mean age (yr) | 33 (28–41) | 40 (29–47) | 0.03 |
| Male, n (%) | 18 (36.7) | 53 (54.1) | 0.047 |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 120 (110–120) | 120 (118–130) | 0.001 |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 70 (60–80) | 80 (70–80) | 0.02 |
| Mean arterial pressure (mmHg) | 87 (78–93) | 93 (87–97) | 0.003 |
| Urinary red blood cell (/μL) | 34 (7–131) | 22 (7–67) | 0.13 |
| Urinary protein to serum creatinine ratio (mg/g Cr) | 486 (159–881) | 756 (335–1596) | 0.009 |
| 24-h urine protein excretion (g/24 h) | 0.68 (0.30–1.09) | 0.99 (0.40–1.70) | 0.03 |
| < 0.3 | 12 (24.5%) | 15 (15.3%) | 0.009 |
| 0.3–0.99 | 23 (46.9%) | 36 (36.7%) | |
| 1.0–2.99 | 13 (26.5%) | 33 (33.7%) | |
| ≥ 3 | 1 (2.0%) | 14 (14.3%) | |
| Serum creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.89 (0.72–1.07) | 1.19 (0.92–1.52) | < 0.0001 |
| Cystatin C (mg/dL) | 0.98 (0.79–1.12) | 1.22 (1.00–2.00) | < 0.0001 |
| eGFR (mL/min•1.73m2)b | 92.95 (73.96–118.78) | 70.94 (52.26–91.57) | < 0.0001 |
| CKD Stagesc, n (%) | < 0.0001 | ||
| 1 | 30 (61.2) | 27 (27.6) | |
| 2 | 15 (30.6) | 34 (34.7) | |
| 3a | 2 (4.1) | 20 (20.4) | |
| 3b | 1 (2.0) | 7 (7.1) | |
| 4 | 1 (2.0) | 4 (4.1) | |
| 5 | 0 (0.0) | 6 (6.1) | |
| Oxford classificationd, n (%) | |||
| M0/ M1 | 9 (18.4), 40 (81.6) | 7 (7.1),91 (92.9) | 0.04 |
| E0/E1 | 38 (77.6), 11 (22.4) | 75 (76.5), 23 (23.5) | 0.89 |
| S0/S1 | 13 (26.5), 36 (73.5) | 11 (11.2), 87 (88.8) | 0.02 |
| T0/T1/T2 | 22 (44.9), 19 (38.8), 8 (16.3) | 23 (23.5), 46 (46.9), 29 (29.6) | 0.008 |
| C0/C1/C2 | 22 (44.9), 23 (46.9), 4 (8.2) | 44 (44.9), 43 (43.9), 11 (11.2) | 0.79 |
| Medical treatments, n (%) | |||
| Untreated | 10 (20.4) | 25 (25.5) | 0.49 |
| Corticosteroids | 22 (44.9) | 49 (50.0) | 0.56 |
| Immunosuppressants | 26 (53.1) | 50 (51.0) | 0.82 |
| ACE-Is/ARBs | 34 (69.4) | 65 (66.3) | 0.71 |
Data are presented as median (interquartile range) or frequency in percent
BP: blood pressure; 1 mmHg = 0.133Kpa; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; M: mesangial hypercellularity score < 0.5 (M0) or > 0.5 (M1); E: endocapillary hypercellularity absent (E0) or present (E1); S: segmental glomerulosclerosis absent (S0) or present (S1), presence or absence of podocyte hypertrophy/tip lesions in biopsy specimens with S1; T: tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis < 25% (T0), 26–50% (T1), or > 50% (T2); C: cellular/fibrocellular crescents absent (C0), present in at least 1 glomerulus (C1), in > 25% of glomeruli (C2)
aTime interval between renal biopsy of patients with IgA nephropathy and sample collection
beGFR was calculated according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation [19]
cCKD stages 1–5 were divided by eGFR≥90 (G1), 60–89 (G2), 45–59 (G3a), 30–44 (G3b), 15–29 (G4), and < 15 (G5) mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively, according to the new KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) classification [20]
dDetermined in accordance with the Oxford classification [5]
Correlation between serum TNF-α and clinical parameters of patients with IgA nephropathy
| Variable | Bivariate Regression Coefficient | Bivariate | Multivariate Regression Coefficient | Multivariate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | 0.02 c | |||
| Systolic BP | 0.30 | < 0.0001 | ||
| Diastolic BP | 0.19 | 0.02 | ||
| 24-h urine protein excretion | 0.22 | 0.007 | 0.33 | 0.04 |
| Urinary protein to serum creatinine ratio | 0.26 | 0.002 | 0.33 | 0.03 |
| Serum creatinine | 0.49 | < 0.0001 | 0.46 | < 0.0001 |
| Cystatin C | 0.51 | < 0.0001 | 0.59 | < 0.0001 |
| eGFR d | −0.47 | < 0.0001 | 0.49 | < 0.0001 |
BP: blood pressure; 1 mmHg = 0.133Kpa; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate
aSpearman's correlation analysis unless otherwise specified
bMultiple linear regression adjusted for sex, Systolic BP and Diastolic BP
cMann–Whitney U-test
deGFR was calculated according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation [19]
Fig. 3Correlations between serum levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and different grade according to Oxford Classification a. (a) Serum levels of TNF-α were significantly higher in patients with mesangial hypercellularity grade M1 than that in patients with grade M0 [M1: 9.30 (7.90–10.60) pg/mL vs. M0: 6.70 (6.00–10.58) pg/mL, P = 0.03]. (d) Serum levels of TNF-α in patients with tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis grade T2 were significantly higher than that in grade T0 [T2: 10.60 (8.25–12.85) pg/mL vs. T0: 6.70 (6.00–10.58) pg/mL, P = 0.0005] and T1 [T2: 10.60 (8.25–12.85) pg/mL vs. T1: 9.20 (8.00–10.20) pg/mL, P = 0.02]; But there was no difference between patients with grade T1 and T0 (P = 0.05). (b, c and e) Serum levels of TNF-α in patients with different grades of endocapillary hypercellularity [E1: 9.35 (7.53–12.35) pg/mL vs. E0: 9.00 (7.75–10.60) pg/mL, P = 0.66], segmental glomerulosclerosis [S1: 9.40 (7.90–10.60) pg/mL vs. S0: 7.90 (6.20–10.68) pg/mL, P = 0.06] and cellular/fibrocellular crescents [C2:10.20 (7.00–14.50) pg/mL vs. C0: 9.00 (7.53–11.03) pg/mL, P = 0.22; C2: 10.20 (7.00–14.50) pg/mL vs. C1: 9.15 (7.80–10.50) pg/mL, P = 0.26; C1: 9.15 (7.80–10.50) pg/mL vs. C0: 9.00 (7.53–11.03) pg/mL, P = 0.81] did not show any significant difference. Statistically significant differences were tested with Mann–Whitney U-test. a Determined in accordance with the Oxford classification [5]