Zachary H Hopkins1, Aaron M Secrest2. 1. 1 University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. 2. 2 Department of Dermatology and Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Google Trends (GT) offers insights into public interests and behaviors and holds potential for guiding public health campaigns. We evaluated trends in US searches for sunscreen, sunburn, skin cancer, and melanoma and their relationships with melanoma outcomes. DESIGN: Google Trends was queried for US search volumes from 2004 to 2017. Time-matched search term data were correlated with melanoma outcomes data from Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Program and United States Cancer Statistics databases (2004-2014 and 2010-2014, respectively). SETTING: Users of the Google search engine in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Google search engine users in the United States. This represents approximately 65% of the population. MEASURES: Search volumes, melanoma outcomes. ANALYSIS: Pearson correlations between search term volumes, time, and national melanoma outcomes. Spearman correlations between state-level search data and melanoma outcomes. RESULTS: The terms "sunscreen," "sunburn," "skin cancer," and "melanoma" were all highly correlated ( P < .001), with sunscreen and sunburn having the greatest correlation ( r = 0.95). Sunscreen/sunburn searches have increased over time, but skin cancer/melanoma searches have decreased ( P < .05). Nationally, sunscreen, sunburn, and skin cancer were significantly correlated with melanoma incidence. At the state level, only sunscreen and melanoma searches were significantly correlated with melanoma incidence. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that online skin cancer prevention campaigns should focus on the search terms "sunburn" and "sunscreen," given the decreasing online searches for skin cancer and melanoma. This is reinforced by the finding that sunscreen searches are higher in areas with higher melanoma incidence.
PURPOSE: Google Trends (GT) offers insights into public interests and behaviors and holds potential for guiding public health campaigns. We evaluated trends in US searches for sunscreen, sunburn, skin cancer, and melanoma and their relationships with melanoma outcomes. DESIGN: Google Trends was queried for US search volumes from 2004 to 2017. Time-matched search term data were correlated with melanoma outcomes data from Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Program and United States Cancer Statistics databases (2004-2014 and 2010-2014, respectively). SETTING: Users of the Google search engine in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Google search engine users in the United States. This represents approximately 65% of the population. MEASURES: Search volumes, melanoma outcomes. ANALYSIS: Pearson correlations between search term volumes, time, and national melanoma outcomes. Spearman correlations between state-level search data and melanoma outcomes. RESULTS: The terms "sunscreen," "sunburn," "skin cancer," and "melanoma" were all highly correlated ( P < .001), with sunscreen and sunburn having the greatest correlation ( r = 0.95). Sunscreen/sunburn searches have increased over time, but skin cancer/melanoma searches have decreased ( P < .05). Nationally, sunscreen, sunburn, and skin cancer were significantly correlated with melanoma incidence. At the state level, only sunscreen and melanoma searches were significantly correlated with melanoma incidence. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that online skin cancer prevention campaigns should focus on the search terms "sunburn" and "sunscreen," given the decreasing online searches for skin cancer and melanoma. This is reinforced by the finding that sunscreen searches are higher in areas with higher melanoma incidence.
Entities:
Keywords:
Google Trends; health promotion; medical self-care; melanoma; online search interest; policy change; skin cancer prevention
Authors: Luiz Fernando Quintanilha; Laumar Neves Souza; Daniel Sanches; Rafael Senos Demarco; Kiyoshi Ferreira Fukutani Journal: Ecancermedicalscience Date: 2019-09-24
Authors: Giovanni S Marchini; Kauy V M Faria; Felippe L Neto; Fábio César Miranda Torricelli; Alexandre Danilovic; Fábio Carvalho Vicentini; Carlos A Batagello; Miguel Srougi; William C Nahas; Eduardo Mazzucchi Journal: World J Urol Date: 2020-10-27 Impact factor: 4.226