Literature DB >> 30428104

Perceptions of Parenting Residents Among Family Medicine Residency Directors.

Laura E Morris1, Erik Lindbloom1, Robin L Kruse2, Karla T Washington1, Nikole J Cronk1, Heather L Paladine3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Parenting during residency is increasingly common, and resident parents face unique demands on their time and emotional and cognitive resources. Physicians at all levels of training perceive negative impacts of parenting on career and family life. Surveys of program directors (PDs) in other specialties reveal concern about performance and quality of life of parenting residents. The primary aims of this study were to examine family medicine PDs' perceptions of parenting residents' performance and the adequacy of parenting support structures.
METHODS: Data were collected from the 2017 Council of Academic Family Medicine (CAFM) Educational Research Alliance (CERA) Family Medicine Residency Program Directors survey. Directors provided the number and status of parenting residents and rated adequacy of parenting resources, resident performance, and impact of parenting on residents using a Likert scale. Results were compared between male/female PDs and male/female residents.
RESULTS: Response rate was 57.1%. Less than half of PDs reported adequate parenting support structures in their program (46%). Over 40% of PDs reported that 81%-100% of female residents who take parental leave end up extending their residency training, the most common response category. PDs did not report gender-based differences in performance of parenting residents. PDs most often reported significantly worse well-being for female parenting residents but perceived improved well-being of male parents.
CONCLUSIONS: Less than half of family medicine PDs feel their program has adequate parenting resources. Female parenting residents commonly extend residency training. PDs perceive parenting negatively impacts well-being of female residents, but not male residents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30428104     DOI: 10.22454/FamMed.2018.978635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Med        ISSN: 0742-3225            Impact factor:   1.756


  2 in total

1.  Outside the lines: the added value of a generalist practitioner: Dr Ian McWhinney Lecture, 2019.

Authors:  David Loxterkamp
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.275

2. 

Authors:  David Loxterkamp
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.275

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.