Literature DB >> 30428095

Incidence and Outcomes of Sterile Multifocal Inflammatory Keratitis and Diffuse Lamellar Keratitis After SMILE.

Dan Z Reinstein, Alastair J Stuart, Ryan S Vida, Timothy J Archer, Glenn I Carp.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the incidence outcomes of sterile multifocal inflammatory keratitis and diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK) after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in a large population.
METHODS: This was a retrospective review of a population of 4,000 consecutive eyes treated by SMILE at the London Vision Clinic using the VisuMax femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). The inclusion criterion was to have presented with inflammatory keratitis after SMILE. In some cases after SMILE, the inflammatory keratitis presented as sterile multifocal interface keratitis uncharacteristic of classic DLK. The incidence was measured and categorized as primary or secondary by presenting appearance, grade, and time to presentation. Patients were observed for 1 year after surgery and standard outcomes analysis was performed.
RESULTS: Of the 4,000 eye population, there were 18 cases (0.45%) of DLK grade 1 or 2. All cases were managed and resolved with topical steroid therapy. Of these, 12 cases (67%) were of classic appearance and 6 cases (33%) presented as sterile multifocal inflammatory keratitis. DLK was primary in nature in 11 cases (61%) and secondary in 7 cases (39%). Postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 93% of eyes. No patients lost any lines of corrected distance visual acuity and there was no change in contrast sensitivity.
CONCLUSIONS: DLK occurred after SMILE with an incidence of 0.45% in this population. Topical steroid therapy resolved the DLK in all cases with no sequelae and no adverse effect on refractive or visual outcome at 1 year postoperatively. A unique type of DLK presentation can occur after SMILE, characterized by multiple focal sterile inflammatory spots. Management is the same as for classic DLK, but with a lower threshold for performing an interface washout. [J Refract Surg. 2018;34(11):751-759.]. Copyright 2018, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30428095     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20181001-02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  5 in total

1.  Delayed diffuse lamellar keratitis after small-incision lenticule extraction related to immunoglobulin A nephropathy: A case report.

Authors:  Ting-Ting Dan; Tai-Xiang Liu; Yi-Lu Liao; Zong-Ze Li
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 1.534

Review 2.  Refractive surgery beyond 2020.

Authors:  Marcus Ang; Damien Gatinel; Dan Z Reinstein; Erik Mertens; Jorge L Alió Del Barrio; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Risk factors and incidence of suction loss during small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in 8493 eyes.

Authors:  Tian-Ze Huang; Ling Shen; Xiao-Ning Yu; Hong-Ying Jin
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 4.  Complications of small incision lenticule extraction.

Authors:  Mohamed Ibrahime Asif; Rahul Kumar Bafna; Jodhbir Singh Mehta; Jagadesh Reddy; Jeewan Singh Titiyal; Prafulla K Maharana; Namrata Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 5.  Advances in refractive corneal lenticule extraction.

Authors:  Matthias Fuest; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Taiwan J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.