Matthijs G Bossong1,2, Mathilde Antoniades1, Matilda Azis1, Carly Samson1, Beverley Quinn3, Ilaria Bonoldi1, Gemma Modinos1, Jesus Perez3,4, Oliver D Howes1, James M Stone1,5, Paul Allen1,6, Philip McGuire1. 1. Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. 3. Cambridge Early Onset service, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Mental Health Partnership National Health Service Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 4. Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 5. Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. 6. Department of Psychology, University of Roehampton, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Importance: Preclinical and human data suggest that hippocampal dysfunction plays a critical role in the onset of psychosis. Neural hyperactivity in the hippocampus is thought to drive an increase in subcortical dopamine function through glutamatergic projections to the striatum. Objective: To examine the association between hippocampal glutamate levels in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis and their subsequent clinical outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study of 86 individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis and 30 healthy control individuals, with a mean follow-up of 18.5 months, was conducted between November 1, 2011, and November 1, 2017, at early detection services in London and Cambridge, United Kingdom. Main Outcomes and Measures: Concentrations of glutamate and other metabolites were measured in the left hippocampus using 3-T proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy at the first clinical presentation. At follow-up, clinical outcomes were assessed in terms of transition or nontransition to psychosis using the Comprehensive Assessment of the At-Risk Mental State criteria and the level of overall functioning using the Global Assessment of Function scale. Results: Of 116 total participants, 86 were at clinical high risk for psychosis (50 [58%] male; mean [SD] age, 22.4 [3.5] years) and 30 were healthy controls (14 [47%] male; mean [SD] age, 24.7 [3.8] years). At follow-up, 12 clinical high-risk individuals developed a first episode of psychosis whereas 74 clinical high-risk individuals did not; 19 clinical high-risk individuals showed good overall functioning (Global Assessment of Function ≥65), whereas 38 clinical high-risk individuals had a poor functional outcome (Global Assessment of Function <65). Compared with clinical high-risk individuals who did not become psychotic, clinical high-risk individuals who developed psychosis showed higher hippocampal glutamate levels (mean [SD], 8.33 [1.48] vs 9.16 [1.28] glutamate levels; P = .048). The clinical high-risk individuals who developed psychosis also had higher myo-inositol levels (mean [SD], 7.60 [1.23] vs 6.24 [1.36] myo-inositol levels; P = .002) and higher creatine levels (mean [SD], 8.18 [0.74] vs 7.32 [1.09] creatine levels; P = .01) compared with clinical high-risk individuals who did not become psychotic, and higher myo-inositol levels compared with healthy controls (mean [SD], 7.60 [1.23] vs 6.19 [1.51] myo-inositol levels; P = .005). Higher hippocampal glutamate levels in clinical high-risk individuals were also associated with a poor functional outcome (mean [SD], 8.83 [1.43] vs 7.76 [1.40] glutamate levels; P = .02). In the logistic regression analyses, hippocampal glutamate levels were significantly associated with clinical outcome in terms of transition and nontransition to psychosis (β = 0.48; odds ratio = 1.61; 95% CI, 1.00-2.59; P = .05) and overall functioning (β = 0.53; odds ratio = 1.71; 95% CI, 1.10-2.66; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings indicate that adverse clinical outcomes in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis may be associated with an increase in baseline hippocampal glutamate levels, as well as an increase in myo-inositol and creatine levels. This conclusion suggests that these measures could contribute to the stratification of clinical high-risk individuals according to future clinical outcomes.
Importance: Preclinical and human data suggest that hippocampal dysfunction plays a critical role in the onset of psychosis. Neural hyperactivity in the hippocampus is thought to drive an increase in subcortical dopamine function through glutamatergic projections to the striatum. Objective: To examine the association between hippocampal glutamate levels in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis and their subsequent clinical outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study of 86 individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis and 30 healthy control individuals, with a mean follow-up of 18.5 months, was conducted between November 1, 2011, and November 1, 2017, at early detection services in London and Cambridge, United Kingdom. Main Outcomes and Measures: Concentrations of glutamate and other metabolites were measured in the left hippocampus using 3-T proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy at the first clinical presentation. At follow-up, clinical outcomes were assessed in terms of transition or nontransition to psychosis using the Comprehensive Assessment of the At-Risk Mental State criteria and the level of overall functioning using the Global Assessment of Function scale. Results: Of 116 total participants, 86 were at clinical high risk for psychosis (50 [58%] male; mean [SD] age, 22.4 [3.5] years) and 30 were healthy controls (14 [47%] male; mean [SD] age, 24.7 [3.8] years). At follow-up, 12 clinical high-risk individuals developed a first episode of psychosis whereas 74 clinical high-risk individuals did not; 19 clinical high-risk individuals showed good overall functioning (Global Assessment of Function ≥65), whereas 38 clinical high-risk individuals had a poor functional outcome (Global Assessment of Function <65). Compared with clinical high-risk individuals who did not become psychotic, clinical high-risk individuals who developed psychosis showed higher hippocampal glutamate levels (mean [SD], 8.33 [1.48] vs 9.16 [1.28] glutamate levels; P = .048). The clinical high-risk individuals who developed psychosis also had higher myo-inositol levels (mean [SD], 7.60 [1.23] vs 6.24 [1.36] myo-inositol levels; P = .002) and higher creatine levels (mean [SD], 8.18 [0.74] vs 7.32 [1.09] creatine levels; P = .01) compared with clinical high-risk individuals who did not become psychotic, and higher myo-inositol levels compared with healthy controls (mean [SD], 7.60 [1.23] vs 6.19 [1.51] myo-inositol levels; P = .005). Higher hippocampal glutamate levels in clinical high-risk individuals were also associated with a poor functional outcome (mean [SD], 8.83 [1.43] vs 7.76 [1.40] glutamate levels; P = .02). In the logistic regression analyses, hippocampal glutamate levels were significantly associated with clinical outcome in terms of transition and nontransition to psychosis (β = 0.48; odds ratio = 1.61; 95% CI, 1.00-2.59; P = .05) and overall functioning (β = 0.53; odds ratio = 1.71; 95% CI, 1.10-2.66; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings indicate that adverse clinical outcomes in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis may be associated with an increase in baseline hippocampal glutamate levels, as well as an increase in myo-inositol and creatine levels. This conclusion suggests that these measures could contribute to the stratification of clinical high-risk individuals according to future clinical outcomes.
Authors: Belinda R Lennox; Emma C Palmer-Cooper; Thomas Pollak; Jane Hainsworth; Jacqui Marks; Leslie Jacobson; Bethan Lang; Hannah Fox; Berne Ferry; Linda Scoriels; Hannah Crowley; Peter B Jones; Paul J Harrison; Angela Vincent Journal: Lancet Psychiatry Date: 2016-12-08 Impact factor: 27.083
Authors: Janine Doorduin; Erik F J de Vries; Antoon T M Willemsen; Jan Cees de Groot; Rudi A Dierckx; Hans C Klein Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2009-10-16 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: E J Meyer; I I Kirov; A Tal; M S Davitz; J S Babb; M Lazar; D Malaspina; O Gonen Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-07-21 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Eric Plitman; Camilo de la Fuente-Sandoval; Francisco Reyes-Madrigal; Sofia Chavez; Gladys Gómez-Cruz; Pablo León-Ortiz; Ariel Graff-Guerrero Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2015-08-28 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Christos Pantelis; Dennis Velakoulis; Patrick D McGorry; Stephen J Wood; John Suckling; Lisa J Phillips; Alison R Yung; Edward T Bullmore; Warrick Brewer; Bridget Soulsby; Patricia Desmond; Philip K McGuire Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-01-25 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: E S Lutkenhoff; T G van Erp; M A Thomas; S Therman; M Manninen; M O Huttunen; J Kaprio; J Lönnqvist; J O'Neill; T D Cannon Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2008-07-22 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Oliver D Howes; Subrata K Bose; Federico Turkheimer; Isabel Valli; Alice Egerton; Lucia R Valmaggia; Robin M Murray; Philip McGuire Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2011-07-18 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: A Egerton; B V Broberg; N Van Haren; K Merritt; G J Barker; D J Lythgoe; R Perez-Iglesias; L Baandrup; S W Düring; K V Sendt; J M Stone; E Rostrup; I E Sommer; B Glenthøj; R S Kahn; P Dazzan; P McGuire Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 13.437
Authors: Laura A Yoviene Sykes; Maria Ferrara; Jean Addington; Carrie E Bearden; Kristin S Cadenhead; Tyrone D Cannon; Barbara A Cornblatt; Diana O Perkins; Daniel H Mathalon; Larry J Seidman; Ming T Tsuang; Elaine F Walker; Thomas H McGlashan; Kristen A Woodberry; Albert R Powers; Allison N Ponce; John D Cahill; Jessica M Pollard; Vinod H Srihari; Scott W Woods Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2019-12-19 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Lawrence S Kegeles; Adam Ciarleglio; Pablo León-Ortiz; Francisco Reyes-Madrigal; Jeffrey A Lieberman; Gary Brucato; Ragy R Girgis; Camilo de la Fuente-Sandoval Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2019-09-12 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Nina V Kraguljac; William M McDonald; Alik S Widge; Carolyn I Rodriguez; Mauricio Tohen; Charles B Nemeroff Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2021-01-05 Impact factor: 19.242
Authors: Gemma Modinos; Paul Allen; Andre Zugman; Danai Dima; Matilda Azis; Carly Samson; Ilaria Bonoldi; Beverly Quinn; George W G Gifford; Sophie E Smart; Mathilde Antoniades; Matthijs G Bossong; Matthew R Broome; Jesus Perez; Oliver D Howes; James M Stone; Anthony A Grace; Philip McGuire Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2020-04-10 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Gemma Modinos; Anja Richter; Alice Egerton; Ilaria Bonoldi; Matilda Azis; Mathilde Antoniades; Matthijs Bossong; Nicolas Crossley; Jesus Perez; James M Stone; Mattia Veronese; Fernando Zelaya; Anthony A Grace; Oliver D Howes; Paul Allen; Philip McGuire Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2021-05-03 Impact factor: 7.853