Literature DB >> 30427960

An In Vivo and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Investigation of the Accuracy in Measuring Alveolar Bone Height and Detecting Dehiscence and Fenestration Defects.

Andrew G Peterson, Mansen Wang, Shawneen Gonzalez, David A Covell, James Katancik, Harjit Singh Sehgal.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) accuracy in measuring facial bone height and detecting dehiscence and fenestration defects around teeth.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who were treatment planned for periodontal flap or dental implant surgeries were enrolled (n = 25). CBCT imaging (Carestream CS 9300) was obtained at 0.09-mm voxels (n = 10 patients, 23 teeth) and at 0.18-mm voxels (n = 15 patients, 33 teeth). Facial bone height measurements, from cusp tip to crest of bone height along the long axis of the tooth, and presence or absence of dehiscence or fenestration defects were recorded from CBCT images in triplicates independently by two examiners. The corresponding clinical measurements were made at the time of surgery. Comparisons of CBCT and clinical measurements were made using paired t tests for teeth: anterior and posterior, maxillary and mandibular, with or without restorations, or root canal therapy. Level of agreement between investigators was assessed by concordance correlation coefficients (CCC), Pearson's correlation coefficient (PCC), and Cohen's Kappa.
RESULTS: Comparing mean CBCT and clinical measurements, statistically significant differences were noted for 0.09-mm and 0.18-mm voxel sizes, for anterior and posterior teeth, for maxillary and mandibular teeth, for teeth with or without restorations, and for teeth without root canal therapy (P < .05). Clinical and CBCT measurements were similar for teeth with crowns and with root canal therapy (P > .05). CBCT measurements underestimated mean facial bone height from 0.33 ± 0.78 to 0.88 ± 1.14 mm (mean ± SD) and absolute facial bone height values from 0.56 ± 0.35 to 1.08 ± 0.92 mm. Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability for measuring facial bone height ranged from poor to substantial (PCC = 0.78 to 0.97 and CCC = 0.63 to 0.96, respectively). Interexaminer reliability for detection of dehiscence and fenestration defects ranged from poor to moderate (Cohen's Kappa = -0.09 to 0.66).
CONCLUSION: CBCT imaging underestimated facial bone height and overestimated the presence of dehiscence and fenestration defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30427960     DOI: 10.11607/jomi.6633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  9 in total

1.  Comprehensive peri-implant tissue evaluation with ultrasonography and cone-beam computed tomography: A pilot study.

Authors:  Rafael Siqueira; Khaled Sinjab; Ying-Chun Pan; Fabiana Soki; Hsun-Liang Chan; Oliver Kripfgans
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 5.021

2.  A New Method of Measuring the Volumetric Change of Alveolar Bone Around Dental Implants Using Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Young-Wook Lim; Young-Jun Lim; Bongju Kim; Seung-Pyo Lee
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Geometric Reproducibility of Three-Dimensional Oral Implant Planning Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Franz Sebastian Schwindling; Sophia Boehm; Christopher Herpel; Dorothea Kronsteiner; Lorenz Vogel; Alexander Juerchott; Sabine Heiland; Martin Bendszus; Peter Rammelsberg; Tim Hilgenfeld
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Thickness of the Buccal and Alveolar Bones Overlying Central Incisors: A Radiographic Iraqi Study.

Authors:  Nuhad A Hassan; Aseel S Khazaal Al-Jaboori
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2022-02-09

5.  Effect of voxel size in cone-beam computed tomography on surface area measurements of dehiscences and fenestrations in the lower anterior buccal region.

Authors:  B J van Leeuwen; P U Dijkstra; J A Dieters; H P J Verbeek; A M Kuijpers-Jagtman; Y Ren
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.606

6.  A Two-Year Follow-Up Assessment of Decreasing Crestal Bone Levels Around Dental Implants in Patients Rehabilitated With Mandibular Implant Overdentures.

Authors:  Prince Kumar; Brajesh Dammani; Monica Jaideep Mahajani; Vinay H Vadvadgi; Rashmi Jawade; Mohit V Patil
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-11

7.  Impact of the blooming artefact on dental implant dimensions in 13 cone-beam computed tomography devices.

Authors:  Victor Aquino Wanderley; Karla de Faria Vasconcelos; Andre Ferreira Leite; Ruben Pauwels; Sohaib Shujaat; Reinhilde Jacobs; Matheus L Oliveira
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-07-14

Review 8.  New evolution of cone-beam computed tomography in dentistry: Combining digital technologies.

Authors:  Supreet Jain; Kartik Choudhary; Ravleen Nagi; Stuti Shukla; Navneet Kaur; Deepak Grover
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2019-09-24

Review 9.  Buccal Bone Thickness in Anterior and Posterior Teeth-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Diana Heimes; Eik Schiegnitz; Robert Kuchen; Peer W Kämmerer; Bilal Al-Nawas
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.