Literature DB >> 30427765

A review and consideration on the kinematics of reach-to-grasp movements in macaque monkeys.

Umberto Castiello1, Marco Dadda1.   

Abstract

The bases for understanding the neuronal mechanisms that underlie the control of reach-to-grasp movements among nonhuman primates, particularly macaques, has been widely studied. However, only a few kinematic descriptions of their prehensile actions are available. A thorough understanding of macaques' prehensile movements is manifestly critical, in light of their role in biomedical research as valuable models for studying neuromotor disorders and brain mechanisms, as well as for developing brain-machine interfaces to facilitate arm control. This article aims to review the current state of knowledge on the kinematics of grasping movements that macaques perform in naturalistic, seminaturalistic, and laboratory settings, to answer the following questions: Are kinematic signatures affected by the context within which the movement is performed? In what ways are kinematics of humans' and macaques' prehensile actions similar/dissimilar? Our analysis reflects the challenges involved in making comparisons across settings and species due to the heterogeneous picture in terms of the number of subjects, stimuli, conditions, and hands used. The kinematics of free-ranging macaques are characterized by distinctive features that are exhibited neither by macaques in laboratory setting nor by human subjects. The temporal incidence of key kinematic landmarks diverges significantly between species, indicating disparities in the overall organization of movement. Given such complexities, we attempt a synthesis of the extant body of evidence, intending to generate some significant implications for directions that future research might take to recognize the remaining gaps and pursue the insights and resolutions to generate an interpretation of movement kinematics that accounts for all settings and subjects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  evolution; humans; kinematics; macaques; reach-to-grasp

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30427765     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00598.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  6 in total

1.  Prehension kinematics in humans and macaques.

Authors:  Yuke Yan; Anton R Sobinov; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 2.974

Review 2.  Sowing the seeds of intentionality: Motor intentions in plants.

Authors:  Qiuran Wang; Silvia Guerra; Francesco Ceccarini; Bianca Bonato; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2021-08-04

3.  Action Observation and Effector Independency.

Authors:  Sonia Betti; Marie Deceuninck; Luisa Sartori; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Blood Analysis of Laboratory Macaca mulatta Used for Neuroscience Research: Investigation of Long-Term and Cumulative Effects of Implants, Fluid Control, and Laboratory Procedures.

Authors:  Detlef Wegener; Dan Qi Priscilla Oh 胡箪棋; Herbert Lukaß; Michael Böer; Andreas K Kreiter
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-10-19

5.  Flexible control of movement in plants.

Authors:  Silvia Guerra; Alessandro Peressotti; Francesca Peressotti; Maria Bulgheroni; Walter Baccinelli; Enrico D'Amico; Alejandra Gómez; Stefano Massaccesi; Francesco Ceccarini; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Can Plants Move Like Animals? A Three-Dimensional Stereovision Analysis of Movement in Plants.

Authors:  Valentina Simonetti; Maria Bulgheroni; Silvia Guerra; Alessandro Peressotti; Francesca Peressotti; Walter Baccinelli; Francesco Ceccarini; Bianca Bonato; Qiuran Wang; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.