Literature DB >> 30426462

Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation with Chondrosphere for Treating Articular Cartilage Defects in the Knee: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.

Xavier Armoiry1, Ewen Cummins2, Martin Connock1, Andrew Metcalfe3, Pamela Royle1, Rhona Johnston2, Jeremy Rodrigues4, Norman Waugh1, Hema Mistry5.   

Abstract

Chondrosphere (Spherox) is a form of autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI). It is licensed for repair of symptomatic articular cartilage defects of the femoral condyle and the patella of the knee with defect sizes up to 10 cm2 in adults. In a single technology appraisal (STA) [TA508] undertaken by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Warwick Evidence was the Evidence Review Group (ERG) invited to independently review the evidence submitted by the manufacturer, Co.Don. The clinical effectiveness data came from their COWISI randomised controlled trial (RCT), which compared Chondrosphere with microfracture (MF). The timing of this appraisal was unfortunate given that MF was no longer the most relevant comparator because NICE had contemporaneously published guidance approving ACI in place of MF. Moreover, the COWISI RCT enrolled mostly patients with small defect sizes. Evidence of clinical effectiveness for Chondrosphere used in people with larger defect size came from another RCT, which compared three doses of Chondrosphere and that by design could not provide evidence comparing Chondrosphere to any other forms of ACI. To estimate the relative clinical performance of Chondrosphere versus other ACI, Co.Don conducted an indirect treatment comparison by network meta-analyses (NMA). The NMA was flawed in that the distribution of population characteristics that are effect modifiers greatly differed across the treatment comparisons of the network. The ERG questioned both the appropriateness of the NMA and the validity of the resulting estimates. Co.Don estimated the cost-effectiveness of Chondrosphere using a lifetime Markov model with all patients receiving the first repair during the first cycle of the model then moving into one of three health states: success, no further repair (NFR), or a second repair, if necessary. Subsequent to the first cycle, those who were a success either remained a success or moved to second repair. All those in NFR remained in NFR. The cost-effectiveness of Chondrosphere compared to other ACI forms relied on the clinical effectiveness estimates of success and failure rates obtained from the company's indirect comparisons, the validity of which the ERG questioned. The company revised cost-effectiveness estimates for Chondrosphere versus MF and for Chondrosphere versus matrix-applied characterised autologous cultured chondrocyte implant (MACI) were £4360 and around £18,000 per quality-adjusted life year gained, respectively. NICE recommended ACI using Chondrosphere for treating symptomatic articular cartilage defects of the femoral condyle and patella of the knee in adults only if certain requirements were met.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30426462     DOI: 10.1007/s40273-018-0737-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  13 in total

1.  Early assessment of the likely cost-effectiveness of a new technology: A Markov model with probabilistic sensitivity analysis of computer-assisted total knee replacement.

Authors:  Hengjin Dong; Martin Buxton
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 2.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee: systematic review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  Hema Mistry; Martin Connock; Joshua Pink; Deepson Shyangdan; Christine Clar; Pamela Royle; Rachel Court; Leela C Biant; Andrew Metcalfe; Norman Waugh
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  Five-year outcome of characterized chondrocyte implantation versus microfracture for symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee: early treatment matters.

Authors:  Johan Vanlauwe; Daniel B F Saris; Jan Victor; Karl Fredrik Almqvist; Johan Bellemans; Frank P Luyten
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  The cost utility of autologous chondrocytes implantation using ChondroCelect® in symptomatic knee cartilage lesions in Belgium.

Authors:  Laetitia Gerlier; Mark Lamotte; Micheline Wille; Peter C Kreuz; Johan Vanlauwe; Dominique Dubois; François M Meurgey
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  What is the effect of physical activity on the knee joint? A systematic review.

Authors:  Donna M Urquhart; Jephtah F L Tobing; Fahad S Hanna; Patricia Berry; Anita E Wluka; Changhai Ding; Flavia M Cicuttini
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  The Effect of Cell Dose on the Early Magnetic Resonance Morphological Outcomes of Autologous Cell Implantation for Articular Cartilage Defects in the Knee: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Philipp Niemeyer; Volker Laute; Thilo John; Christoph Becher; Peter Diehl; Thomas Kolombe; Jakob Fay; Rainer Siebold; Milan Niks; Stefan Fickert; Wolfgang Zinser
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Treatment of symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee: characterized chondrocyte implantation results in better clinical outcome at 36 months in a randomized trial compared to microfracture.

Authors:  Daniel B F Saris; Johan Vanlauwe; Jan Victor; Karl Fredrik Almqvist; Rene Verdonk; Johan Bellemans; Frank P Luyten
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Second-look assessment after all-arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation with spheroides at the knee joint.

Authors:  Rainer Siebold; Georgios Karidakis; Sven Feil; Francis Fernandez
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) before and after orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  Karl-Åke Jansson; Fredrik Granath
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Safety of three different product doses in autologous chondrocyte implantation: results of a prospective, randomised, controlled trial.

Authors:  Christoph Becher; Volker Laute; Stefan Fickert; Wolfgang Zinser; Philipp Niemeyer; Thilo John; Peter Diehl; Thomas Kolombe; Rainer Siebold; Jakob Fay
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 2.359

View more
  11 in total

1.  miRNA induced 3D bioprinted-heterotypic osteochondral interface.

Authors:  Nazmiye Celik; Myoung Hwan Kim; Miji Yeo; Fadia Kamal; Daniel J Hayes; Ibrahim T Ozbolat
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 11.061

Review 2.  Progress and prospect of technical and regulatory challenges on tissue-engineered cartilage as therapeutic combination product.

Authors:  Xiaolei Guo; Yuan Ma; Yue Min; Jiayi Sun; Xinli Shi; Guobiao Gao; Lei Sun; Jiadao Wang
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-06-27

Review 3.  Scientific Developments and Clinical Applications Utilizing Chondrons and Chondrocytes with Matrix for Cartilage Repair.

Authors:  Sarav S Shah; Kai Mithoefer
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 4.  Three-dimensional, Scaffold-Free, Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Moritz Riedl; Gianluca Vadalà; Rocco Papalia; Vincenco Denaro
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-09-21

5.  Critical Reflections on Reimbursement and Access of Advanced Therapies.

Authors:  Steven Simoens; Katrien De Groote; Cornelis Boersma
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 5.988

Review 6.  From Cells to Organs: The Present and Future of Regenerative Medicine.

Authors:  Yichen Wang; Yoon-Young Jang
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

7.  Characterisation of ovine bone marrow-derived stromal cells (oBMSC) and evaluation of chondrogenically induced micro-pellets for cartilage tissue repair in vivo.

Authors:  K Futrega; E Music; P G Robey; S Gronthos; R Crawford; S Saifzadeh; T J Klein; M R Doran
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 6.832

Review 8.  Creating an Optimal In Vivo Environment to Enhance Outcomes Using Cell Therapy to Repair/Regenerate Injured Tissues of the Musculoskeletal System.

Authors:  David A Hart; Norimasa Nakamura
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-07-01

9.  Microvalve Bioprinting of MSC-Chondrocyte Co-Cultures.

Authors:  Joseph Dudman; Ana Marina Ferreira; Piergiorgio Gentile; Xiao Wang; Kenneth Dalgarno
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 10.  Cell therapy for cartilage repair.

Authors:  Charlotte H Hulme; Jade Perry; Helen S McCarthy; Karina T Wright; Martyn Snow; Claire Mennan; Sally Roberts
Journal:  Emerg Top Life Sci       Date:  2021-10-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.