Literature DB >> 30426116

The influence of electrically conductive and non-conductive nanocomposite scaffolds on the maturation and excitability of engineered cardiac tissues.

Ali Navaei1, Kiarash Rahmani Eliato, Robert Ros, Raymond Q Migrino, Brigham C Willis, Mehdi Nikkhah.   

Abstract

Utilization of electrically conductive nanomaterials for developing nanocomposite scaffolds has been at the center of attention for engineering functional cardiac tissues. The primary motive in the use of conductive nanomaterials has been to develop biomimetic scaffolds to recapitulate the extracellular matrix (ECM) of the native heart and to promote cardiac tissue maturity, excitability and electrical signal propagation. Alternatively, it is well accepted that the inclusion of nanomaterials also alters the stiffness and nano-scale topography of the scaffolds. However, what is missing in the literature is that to what extent the sole presence of nanomaterials within a scaffold, regardless of their conductivity, influences the maturation and excitability of engineered cardiac tissues. To address this knowledge gap, we developed four different classes of gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) hydrogels, with varied concentrations, embedded electrically conductive gold nanorods (GNRs) and non-conductive silica nanomaterials (SNPs), to assess the influence of matrix stiffness and the presence of nanomaterials on cardiac cell adhesion, protein expression (i.e. maturation), and tissue-level excitability. Our results demonstrated that either embedding nanomaterials (i.e. GNRs and SNPs) or increasing the matrix stiffness significantly promoted cellular retention and the expression of cardiac-specific markers, including sarcomeric α-actinin (SAC), cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and connexin43 (Cx43) gap junctions. Notably, excitation voltage thresholds at a high frequency (i.e. 2 Hz and higher), in both coupled and uncoupled gap junctions induced by heptanol, were lower for scaffolds embedded conductive GNRs or non-conductive SNPs, independent of matrix stiffness. Overall, our findings demonstrated that the sole presence of nanomaterials within the scaffolding matrix had a more pronounced influence as compared to the scaffold stiffness on the cell-cell coupling, maturation and excitability of engineered cardiac tissues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30426116     DOI: 10.1039/c8bm01050a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomater Sci        ISSN: 2047-4830            Impact factor:   6.843


  10 in total

Review 1.  Three-dimensional scaffold-free microtissues engineered for cardiac repair.

Authors:  Alejandra Patino-Guerrero; Jaimeson Veldhuizen; Wuqiang Zhu; Raymond Q Migrino; Mehdi Nikkhah
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 6.331

Review 2.  Electroconductive biomaterials for cardiac tissue engineering.

Authors:  Hamid Esmaeili; Alejandra Patino-Guerrero; Masoud Hasany; Mohammad Omaish Ansari; Adnan Memic; Alireza Dolatshahi-Pirouz; Mehdi Nikkhah
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 8.947

3.  Conductive and injectable hyaluronic acid/gelatin/gold nanorod hydrogels for enhanced surgical translation and bioprinting.

Authors:  Emi A Kiyotake; Emily E Thomas; Hannah B Homburg; Camille K Milton; Adam D Smitherman; Nathan D Donahue; Kar-Ming Fung; Stefan Wilhelm; Michael D Martin; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 4.854

4.  Electroconductive Photo-Curable PEGDA-Gelatin/PEDOT:PSS Hydrogels for Prospective Cardiac Tissue Engineering Application.

Authors:  Daniele Testore; Alice Zoso; Galder Kortaberria; Marco Sangermano; Valeria Chiono
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-24

5.  An injectable conductive hydrogel restores electrical transmission at myocardial infarct site to preserve cardiac function and enhance repair.

Authors:  Linghong Zhang; Tao Li; Yan Yu; Kun Shi; Zhongwu Bei; Yongjun Qian; Zhiyong Qian
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-06-13

Review 6.  Gelatin Methacrylate Hydrogel for Tissue Engineering Applications-A Review on Material Modifications.

Authors:  Sasinan Bupphathong; Carlos Quiroz; Wei Huang; Pei-Feng Chung; Hsuan-Ya Tao; Chih-Hsin Lin
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-29

Review 7.  Fabrication Methods of Electroactive Scaffold-Based Conducting Polymers for Tissue Engineering Application: A Review.

Authors:  Nurul Ain Najihah Asri; Mohd Muzamir Mahat; Azlan Zakaria; Muhd Fauzi Safian; Umi Marshida Abd Hamid
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-07-07

8.  An Electroconductive, Thermosensitive, and Injectable Chitosan/Pluronic/Gold-Decorated Cellulose Nanofiber Hydrogel as an Efficient Carrier for Regeneration of Cardiac Tissue.

Authors:  Hajar Tohidi; Nahid Maleki-Jirsaraei; Abdolreza Simchi; Fatemeh Mohandes; Zahra Emami; Lorenzo Fassina; Fabio Naro; Bice Conti; Federica Barbagallo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 3.748

Review 9.  Three-Dimensional In Vitro Cell Culture Models for Efficient Drug Discovery: Progress So Far and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Shaimaa M Badr-Eldin; Hibah M Aldawsari; Sabna Kotta; Pran Kishore Deb; Katharigatta N Venugopala
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-27

Review 10.  Nanomaterials for Cardiac Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Devang R Amin; Eric Sink; Suguna P Narayan; Mostafa Abdel-Hafiz; Luisa Mestroni; Brisa Peña
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 4.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.