Literature DB >> 30426053

The data of genomic and phenotypic profiles of the N-acyl homoserine lactone-producing algicidal bacterium Stenotrophomonas rhizophila GA1.

Panqing Yin1, Qin Zhang2, Jianming Zhu3, Guoqiang Wu1, Sanjun Yin4, Zhenhua Ma4, Jin Zhou3.   

Abstract

Herein, an algicidal strain, Stenotrophomonas rhizophila GA1, was isolated from a marine dinoflagellate and its genome was sequenced using next-generation sequencing technology. The genome size of S. rhizophila GA1 was determined to be 5.92 Mb with a G+C content of 62.39%, comprising eight scaffolds of 67 contigs. A total of 4579 functional proteins were assigned according to COG categories. In silico genome annotation protocols identified multiple putative LuxI-like genes located in the upstream position at contig 4. The thin-layer chromatography analysis showed that three kinds of acyl homoserine lactone (AHL) signals could be produced by S. rhizophila GA1. This work describes an algicidal bacterium capable of generating AHL molecules for its ecological adaptation. The annotated genome sequence of this strain may represent a valuable tool for studying algae-bacterium interactions and developing microbial methods to control harmful algae. The genome scaffolds generated are available in the National Center Biotechnology Information (NCBI) BioProject with accession number PRJNA485554.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30426053      PMCID: PMC6222082          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.10.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications table Value of the data It is the first whole genome of algicidal bacterium S. rhizophila GA1. This data allows other researchers to extend the study about the algae-bacterium interactions. The data could be help us developing microbial methods to control harmful algae.

Data

In this study, an algicidal bacterium (Stenotrophomonas rhizophila GA1) was screened from the marine dinoflagellate. The morphology, optimal growth conditions and algicidal ability are shown in Fig. 1A–C. A summary of other data for the isolated strain is listed in Table 1.
Fig. 1

(A) Electron micrographs of cells of S. rhizophila GA1. Preparation and electron microscopy conditions were as described by Hahnke et al. [10]. Magnification: 50,000×. (B) Optimal temperature and pH conditions for the growth of S. rhizophila GA1. Error bars indicate the mean value ± standard deviation of three optical density measurements at 600 nm (OD600). (C) Algicidal activity of S. rhizophila GA1. The control group was sole-cultured G. aerucyinosum, and the initial concentration was 2×104 cells/L. The test group was G. aerucyinosum co-cultured with S. rhizophila GA1 (final concentration was 1 × 105 cells/mL). The total experimental cycle was 18 days. Error bars indicate the mean value ± standard deviation of three measurements of ChII a. (D) Analysis of AHLs from supernatant extracts of GA1 strain. AHLs extracted from cell-free culture supernatants were separated by thin-layer chromatography and detected using an overlay of agar seeded with Agrobacterium tumefaciens 136. Lane 1contains AHL standards (arrows point to C8-oxo-, C10-, and C12-AHL, respectively); lane 2 contains the S. rhizophila GA1 extracts.

Table 1

Basic information and genome features for S. rhizophila GA1.

ItemsDescriptions
Geographic locationThe coastal of Shenzhen, China
Latitude and longitudeN22°59′42.19″, E114°54′74.01″
Organism/strainStenotrophomonas rhizophila GA1
Gram strainNegative
Cell shapeRod
Color of coloniesYellow
Temperature16–36 °C
Optimal pH8.0
Environment (biome)Temperature, salinity, pH value, and sea biome
Environment (feature)Water body of phycosphere (G. aerucyinosum)
Environment (Material)Sea water
SequencerIllumina Hiseq. 2500
Data formatProcessed
Experimental factorMicrobial strain
Experimental featuresWhole genome sequence of S. rhizophila GA1
ConsentN/A
Assembly and annotationCLC Genomics Workbench Version. 5.1
Finishing strategyPrimer design, PCR and sequencing
Genome size5.92 Mb
GC content %62.39%
Number of Contigs67
Total contig size5,929,188
Scafflods8
Total scaffold size6,598,546
Protein enconing genes4579
tRNAs64
rRNAs26
Predicted AHL gene LuxI siteContig 4
Encoding-AHL gene length459–848 bp
(A) Electron micrographs of cells of S. rhizophila GA1. Preparation and electron microscopy conditions were as described by Hahnke et al. [10]. Magnification: 50,000×. (B) Optimal temperature and pH conditions for the growth of S. rhizophila GA1. Error bars indicate the mean value ± standard deviation of three optical density measurements at 600 nm (OD600). (C) Algicidal activity of S. rhizophila GA1. The control group was sole-cultured G. aerucyinosum, and the initial concentration was 2×104 cells/L. The test group was G. aerucyinosum co-cultured with S. rhizophila GA1 (final concentration was 1 × 105 cells/mL). The total experimental cycle was 18 days. Error bars indicate the mean value ± standard deviation of three measurements of ChII a. (D) Analysis of AHLs from supernatant extracts of GA1 strain. AHLs extracted from cell-free culture supernatants were separated by thin-layer chromatography and detected using an overlay of agar seeded with Agrobacterium tumefaciens 136. Lane 1contains AHL standards (arrows point to C8-oxo-, C10-, and C12-AHL, respectively); lane 2 contains the S. rhizophila GA1 extracts. Basic information and genome features for S. rhizophila GA1. The whole genome of S. rhizophila GA1 contained 6,598,546 bases and a G+C content of 62.39% (Table 1). The analyses of the complete genome identified 4579 open reading frames. Homologous comparison by BLAST found 3395 CDS (coding sequence) involving 25 functional COGs (clusters of orthologous groups) and a part of the CDS involving 34 KEGG (Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes) metabolic pathways (Fig. 2A).
Fig. 2

(A) Circular map for the whole genome of S. rhizophila GA1. From the outside to the center: encoding genes, predicted CDSs transcribed in the clockwise (or counter clockwise) direction, ncRNA, GC percent (%), and GC skew (G + C/G-C) in a 1000-bp window. (B) Functional category distribution of S. rhizophila GA1 (based on COG function statistics).

(A) Circular map for the whole genome of S. rhizophila GA1. From the outside to the center: encoding genes, predicted CDSs transcribed in the clockwise (or counter clockwise) direction, ncRNA, GC percent (%), and GC skew (G + C/G-C) in a 1000-bp window. (B) Functional category distribution of S. rhizophila GA1 (based on COG function statistics). Based on the functional categories of COGs and KEGG groups, 271 genes were involved in carbohydrate metabolism and 879 genes participated in amino acid transport and energy conversion (Fig. 2B). Several genes encoding putative AHL inducers ( LuxI-like proteins) were found in contig 4 of S. rhizophila GA1. The thin-layer chromatography (TLC) confirmed S. rhizophila GA1 strain has the ability to produce AHL signaling molecules (Fig. 1D). In addition, a chitinase-coding gene (chi) was found downstream of luxR; the protein encoded by this gene is believed to contribute to the ability of S. rhizophila GA1 to lyse its host (algae).

Experimental design, materials, and methods

Isolation

The seawater sample was collected from the dinoflagellate (G. aerucyinosum) bloom on the Shenzhen coast of China. An isolated strain GA1 caused significant algal lyse. The 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis revealed that it shared 99.7% similarity to the type strain of Stenotrophomonas rhizophila. We provisionally named this strain S. rhizophila GA1.

DNA extraction, sequencing, and assembly

Genomic DNA of S. rhizophila GA1 was extracted using the genomic DNA extraction kit (MoBio, CA, USA) following the protocols of the manufacturer. Whole-genome sequencing of the normalized DNA was performed using IlluminaHiseq. 2500 (San Diego, USA) instrument, as descripted in Glushchenko et al. [1]. De novo assembly was performed using CLC Genomics Workbench version 5.1 (CLC Bio, Denmark) and trimmed using a minimum Phred quality score of 20, a minimum length of 50 bp, allowing no ambiguous nucleotides and trimming off some low-quality nucleotides [2]. The reads were assembled with SOAPdenovo (V.2.04) [3], and the sequence was annotated using the RAST annotation server [4]. tRNA and rRNA genes were predicted by tRNAscan-SE [5] and RNAmmer [6], respectively. Genes were predicted using Glimmer 3.02 [7] and annotated by searching against the NCBI-nr and KEGG databases.

Thin-layer chromatography (TLC)

To verify the AHL-synthesizing activity of S. rhizophila GA1, reverse-phase thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed as described by Shaw et al. [8] and Ma et al. [9].

Data accessibility

The genome sequence data has been deposited in the GenBank database under accession numbers PRJNA485554.
Subject areaBiology
More specific subject areaBacteriology, Genomics, Ecology
Type of dataFigures, Tables
How data was acquiredThe whole genome was sequenced with an Illumina Hi-Seq. 2500
Data formatAnalyzed
Experimental factorsIsolation and characterization of native strains S. rhizophila GA1. Genomic DNA, extraction and sequencing procedures.
Experimental featuresGenome of the S. rhizophila GA1 was sequenced and assembled.
Data source locationThe strain was isolated from the dinoflagellate (Gymnodinium aerucyinosum) on the Shenzhen coast of China (22°59′42.19″N, 114°54′74.01″E).
Data accessibilityData is with this article. Also, the whole-genome of S. rhizophila GA1 has been deposited in the GenBank database under accession numbers PRJNA485554 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/?term=PRJNA485554).
Related research articleNone
  10 in total

1.  SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing.

Authors:  Anton Bankevich; Sergey Nurk; Dmitry Antipov; Alexey A Gurevich; Mikhail Dvorkin; Alexander S Kulikov; Valery M Lesin; Sergey I Nikolenko; Son Pham; Andrey D Prjibelski; Alexey V Pyshkin; Alexander V Sirotkin; Nikolay Vyahhi; Glenn Tesler; Max A Alekseyev; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer.

Authors:  Arthur L Delcher; Kirsten A Bratke; Edwin C Powers; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence.

Authors:  T M Lowe; S R Eddy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Dilution cultivation of marine heterotrophic bacteria abundant after a spring phytoplankton bloom in the North Sea.

Authors:  Richard L Hahnke; Christin M Bennke; Bernhard M Fuchs; Alexander J Mann; Erhard Rhiel; Hanno Teeling; Rudolf Amann; Jens Harder
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 5.491

5.  Detecting and characterizing N-acyl-homoserine lactone signal molecules by thin-layer chromatography.

Authors:  P D Shaw; G Ping; S L Daly; C Cha; J E Cronan; K L Rinehart; S K Farrand
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Diverse Profiles of AI-1 Type Quorum Sensing Molecules in Cultivable Bacteria from the Mangrove (Kandelia obovata) Rhizosphere Environment.

Authors:  Zhi P Ma; Yong M Lao; Hui Jin; Guang H Lin; Zhong H Cai; Jin Zhou
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Data on gut metagenomes of the patients with Helicobacter pylori infection before and after the antibiotic therapy.

Authors:  Oksana E Glushchenko; Andrei E Samoilov; Evgenii I Olekhnovich; Boris A Kovarsky; Alexander V Tyakht; Alexander V Pavlenko; Vlad V Babenko; Andrei K Larin; Elena S Kostryukova; Maja V Malakhova; Elena N Ilina; Rustem A Abdulkhakov; Dilyara I Safina; Tatiana V Grigoryeva; Sayar R Abdulkhakov; Vadim M Govorun
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2017-01-17

8.  SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler.

Authors:  Ruibang Luo; Binghang Liu; Yinlong Xie; Zhenyu Li; Weihua Huang; Jianying Yuan; Guangzhu He; Yanxiang Chen; Qi Pan; Yunjie Liu; Jingbo Tang; Gengxiong Wu; Hao Zhang; Yujian Shi; Yong Liu; Chang Yu; Bo Wang; Yao Lu; Changlei Han; David W Cheung; Siu-Ming Yiu; Shaoliang Peng; Zhu Xiaoqian; Guangming Liu; Xiangke Liao; Yingrui Li; Huanming Yang; Jian Wang; Tak-Wah Lam; Jun Wang
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 6.524

9.  RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes.

Authors:  Karin Lagesen; Peter Hallin; Einar Andreas Rødland; Hans-Henrik Staerfeldt; Torbjørn Rognes; David W Ussery
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-04-22       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology.

Authors:  Ramy K Aziz; Daniela Bartels; Aaron A Best; Matthew DeJongh; Terrence Disz; Robert A Edwards; Kevin Formsma; Svetlana Gerdes; Elizabeth M Glass; Michael Kubal; Folker Meyer; Gary J Olsen; Robert Olson; Andrei L Osterman; Ross A Overbeek; Leslie K McNeil; Daniel Paarmann; Tobias Paczian; Bruce Parrello; Gordon D Pusch; Claudia Reich; Rick Stevens; Olga Vassieva; Veronika Vonstein; Andreas Wilke; Olga Zagnitko
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.969

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.