| Literature DB >> 30425806 |
Ahmad Javanmard1, Sara Ashtari2, Babak Sabet3, Seyed Hossein Davoodi4, Mohammad Rostami-Nejad5, Mohammad Esmaeil Akbari6, Azadeh Niaz7, Amir Mohammad Mortazavian8.
Abstract
Cancers of the gastrointestinal (GI) track are a serious global health problem. The human GI tract is home to trillions of microorganisms that known as gut microbiota and have established a symbiotic relationship with the host. The human intestinal microbiota plays an important role in the development of the gut immune system, metabolism, nutrition absorption, production of short-chain fatty acids and essential vitamins, resistance to pathogenic microorganisms, and modulates a normal immunological response. Microbiota imbalance has been involved in many disorders including inflammatory bowel disease, obesity, asthma, psychiatric illnesses, and cancers. Oral administration of probiotics seems to play a protective role against cancer development as a kind of functional foods. Moreover, clinical application of probiotics has shown that some probiotic strains can reduce the incidence of post-operative inflammation in cancer patients. In the present narrative review, we carried out update knowledge on probiotic effects and underlying mechanism to GI cancers. Currently, it is accept that most commercial probiotic products are generally safe and can used as a supplement for cancer prevention and treatment. Nevertheless, well-designed, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled human studies are required to gain the acceptance of the potential probiotics as an alternative therapy for cancer control..Entities:
Keywords: Gastrointestinal cancer; Gut microbiota; Prebiotics; Probiotic
Year: 2018 PMID: 30425806 PMCID: PMC6204245
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench ISSN: 2008-2258
Probiotic microorganisms used in human nutrition
| Type Lactobacillus | Type Bifidobacterium | Lactic Acid Bacteria | Other Microorganisms |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
|
Mostly as pharmaceutical products;
mostly as food additives
Selection criteria for probiotic strains
| Criteria | Required properties |
|---|---|
| Safety | Human or animal origin |
| Functionality | Competitiveness with respect to the microbiota inhabiting the intestinal ecosystem |
| Technological | Easy production of high biomass amounts and high productivity of cultures |
Clinical trials of probiotics interventions for prevention, post-operative complications and treatment of CRC
| Type of intervention | Patients | Probiotic strain | Length of treatment | Outcome | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prevention | 38 healthy patients |
| 4 weeks | Reduce of b-glycosidase activity by 10% and urease activity by 13% | ( |
| 17 healthy patients |
| 4 weeks | Induced unique changes in fecal microflora but did not significantly alter any other fecal, serum, or epithelial variables. | ( | |
| 10 CRC and 20 healthy patients |
| 12 weeks | A deterioration of the intestinal environment was observed in the colorectal cancer patients in comparison to the healthy controls, and the intestinal environment improved when probiotics was taken. | ( | |
| Prevention of post-operative complication | 100 CRC patients undergoing surgery |
| 16 days | Improvement in the integrity of gut mucosal barrier and | ( |
| 124 CRC patients undergoing surgery |
| 15 days | Decreased the rate of all postoperative major complication, | ( | |
| 156 CRC patients undergoing surgery |
| 15 days | Probiotic treatment reduce superficial incisional surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients undergoing CRC surgery | ( | |
| 60 CRC patients undergoing surgery |
| 12 days | Faster recovery of bowel function, lower incidences of diarrhea, and slightly lower rate of bacteremia.in probiotic group | ( | |
| Chemotherapy and radiation therapy related toxicity | 150 CRC patients undertreated |
| 24 weeks | Patients had less diarrhea, less abdominal pain, less hospital care, and had fewer | ( |
| 490 gynecological cancer and CRC patients |
| From the 1st day of | Significant decrease of diarrhea (31.6 vs. 51.8%) and | ( |
Clinical trials using probiotics in association with combination therapy of H. pylori eradication
| Patients | Probiotic strain | Length of treatment | Outcome | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 120 dyspeptic adults |
| 10 days | Eradication rate | ( |
| 60 asymptomatic adults |
| 14 days | Eradication rate | ( |
| 120 asymptomatic adults |
| 14 days | Eradication rate | ( |
| 160 dyspeptic adults |
| 4 weeks | Eradication rate | ( |
| 85 asymptomatic adults |
| 2 weeks | Eradication rate | ( |
| 70 dyspeptic adults |
| 10 days | Eradication rate | ( |
| 86 dyspeptic children |
| 2 weeks | Eradication rate | ( |
| 40 dyspeptic children |
| 20 days | Eradication rate | ( |
| 138 dyspeptic adults |
| 4 weeks | Urease activity | ( |
| 65 children |
| unclear | Eradication rate | ( |
| 118 individuals |
| 4 weeks | Eradication | ( |
| 90 individuals |
| 6 weeks | Eradication rate | ( |
Increase,
decrease,
no effect
Clinical trials of probiotics interventions in patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP)
| Patients | Probiotic strain | Length of treatment | Outcome | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45 SAP patients |
| 7 days | reducing pancreatic sepsis and the number of surgical interventions | ( |
| 25 SAP patients |
| 7 days | The time of abdominal pain alleviation, serum amylase restoration, the incidence rate of complications and mean of hospitalization were significantly decreased in group treated with probiotics | ( |
| 62 SAP patients |
| 7 days | symbiotic may prevent organ dysfunctions in the late phase of severe acute pancreatitis | ( |
| 298 SAP patients |
| 28 days | Probiotic prophylaxis with this combination of probiotic strains did not reduce the risk of infectious complications and was associated with an increased risk of mortality. | ( |
| 90 SAP patients |
| unclear | Synbiotic supplements was associated with lower infection rate lower rate of surgical interventions, shorter ICU and hospital stay and reduced mortality rate | ( |
| 70 SAP patients |
| 14 days | Early enteral nutrition (EN) with addition of probiotics resulted in significant lowering of the level of pro-inflammatory cytokines, earlier restoration of gastrointestinal function, decrease of complications and shortening of hospitalization | ( |
Figure 1Anti-carcinogenic mechanisms of probiotics