Literature DB >> 30425806

Probiotics and their role in gastrointestinal cancers prevention and treatment; an overview.

Ahmad Javanmard1, Sara Ashtari2, Babak Sabet3, Seyed Hossein Davoodi4, Mohammad Rostami-Nejad5, Mohammad Esmaeil Akbari6, Azadeh Niaz7, Amir Mohammad Mortazavian8.   

Abstract

Cancers of the gastrointestinal (GI) track are a serious global health problem. The human GI tract is home to trillions of microorganisms that known as gut microbiota and have established a symbiotic relationship with the host. The human intestinal microbiota plays an important role in the development of the gut immune system, metabolism, nutrition absorption, production of short-chain fatty acids and essential vitamins, resistance to pathogenic microorganisms, and modulates a normal immunological response. Microbiota imbalance has been involved in many disorders including inflammatory bowel disease, obesity, asthma, psychiatric illnesses, and cancers. Oral administration of probiotics seems to play a protective role against cancer development as a kind of functional foods. Moreover, clinical application of probiotics has shown that some probiotic strains can reduce the incidence of post-operative inflammation in cancer patients. In the present narrative review, we carried out update knowledge on probiotic effects and underlying mechanism to GI cancers. Currently, it is accept that most commercial probiotic products are generally safe and can used as a supplement for cancer prevention and treatment. Nevertheless, well-designed, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled human studies are required to gain the acceptance of the potential probiotics as an alternative therapy for cancer control..

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastrointestinal cancer; Gut microbiota; Prebiotics; Probiotic

Year:  2018        PMID: 30425806      PMCID: PMC6204245     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench        ISSN: 2008-2258


Introduction

Nowadays, besides of introducing the new technology and methodology for diagnostic and management of GI cancers, some additional aspects are becoming increasingly important, including the maintenance of health a counteracting cancers by health benefits of using probiotics and prebiotics in human nutrition. Probiotics are defined as living bacteria that, when consumed in sufficient quantities, carry the health benefits of the host (1). The main benefit of using probiotic is to help the host maintain the microbial balance of the intestine, reduce pathogenic gastrointestinal microorganisms, the improvement of bowel regularity, and the restoration of intestinal microbiota homeostasisin antibiotic-associated diarrhea (2). Furthermore, several studies have shown potential of probiotics in cancer prevention and treatment through microbiota modulation, immune modulation, reduced bacterial translocation, enhanced gut barrier function, anti-inflammatory and anti-pathogenic activity, with effects on reducing tumor formation and metastasis (3, 4). The possible association between probiotics and GI neoplasm has mainly been evaluated in relation to colorectal cancer (CRC) and gastric-cancer-related Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) (5-9). These results indicate the probiotics are potential dietary supplements against neoplastic predisposition through extensive effects on the immune system of host (25–29). The current narrative review summarizes the update knowledge on probiotic effects and underlying mechanism to GI cancers. Moreover, we presented the comprehensive review of the evidence from clinical studies using probiotics in the prevention or/ and treatment of GI cancers. Probiotics Most of the probiotic products currently available contain lactic acid bacteria (LAB) which belong to the Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium (10). Some of the most important probiotic microorganisms that used in human nutrition are listed in Table 1. Most microorganisms recognized to date as probiotics are Gram-positive, with Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium being the main species used as treatments of gastrointestinal disorders (11). However, some Gram-negatives are also used as probiotics. The best example of this group is Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 (EcN) (12), also known as “Mutaflor,” which has been used in recent years to treat chronic constipation and colitis in Germany (13, 14). Two of the most commercially important LAB that playing an important role in the dairy products are Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactococcus lactis (15).
Table 1

Probiotic microorganisms used in human nutrition

Type LactobacillusType BifidobacteriumLactic Acid BacteriaOther Microorganisms
L. acidophilus (a) B. adolescentis (a) Enterococcus faecium (a) Bacillus clausii (a)
L. amylovorus (b) B. animalis (a) Lactococcus lactis (b) Escherichia coli Nissle 1917(a)
L. casei (a), (b) B. bifidum (a) Streptococcus thermophiles (a) Saccharomyces cerevisiae (boulardi) (a)
L. gasseri (a) B. breve (b)
L. helveticus (a) B. infantis (a)
L. johnsonii (b) B. longum (a)
L. pentosus (b)
L. plantarum (b)
L. reuteri (a)
L. rhamnosus (a), (b)

Mostly as pharmaceutical products;

mostly as food additives

Selection criteria for probiotic strains According to the World Health Organization (WHO), Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), and European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), probiotic strains must meet both safety and functionality for human and animal health, as well as to their technological usefulness (Table 2). Microorganism that used as probiotics should meet the terms of GRAS (Generally Regarded as Safe) and QPS (Qualified Presumption of Safety) status and the safety of a strain is defined as the absence of association with pathogenic cultures, and the antibiotic resistance profile. Functional aspects define their survival in the gastrointestinal tract and its safety effects (16, 17). Due to the rapid growth of the probiotic market, the probiotic survival and maintenance of their properties throughout the storage and distribution process is very important (18, 19). Finally, Suitable probiotic strains should have a positive effect on the host, transfer through the intestinal tract, adhere to the epithelial cells of the intestine, produce antimicrobial agents against the pathogen and stabilize the intestinal microflora (20).
Table 2

Selection criteria for probiotic strains

CriteriaRequired properties
SafetyHuman or animal originIsolated from the gastrointestinal tract of healthy individualsHistory of safe usePrecise diagnostic identification (phenotype and genotype traits)Absence of data regarding an association with infective diseaseAbsence of the ability to cleave bile acid saltsNo adverse effectsAbsence of genes responsible for antibiotic resistance localized in non-stable elements
FunctionalityCompetitiveness with respect to the microbiota inhabiting the intestinal ecosystemAbility to survive and maintain the metabolic activity, and to grow in the target siteResistance to bile salts and enzymesResistance to low pH in the stomachCompetitiveness with respect to microbial species inhabiting the intestinal ecosystemAntagonistic activity towards pathogensResistance to bacteriocins and acids produced by the endogenic intestinal microbiotaAdherence and ability to colonize some particular sites within the host organismAn appropriate survival rate in the gastrointestinal system
TechnologicalusabilityEasy production of high biomass amounts and high productivity of culturesViability and stability of the desired properties of probiotic bacteria during the fixing processHigh storage survival rate in finished productsGuarantee of desired sensory properties of finished productsGenetic stabilityResistance to bacteriophages
Probiotics and GI cancers Gastrointestinal cancer refers to malignant conditions of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and other organs involved in digestive system which includes cancers of the esophagus, gallbladder, liver, pancreas, gastric, small intestine, colon and rectum (21). GI cancers are a major health problem, accounting for 25% of all cancers and 9% of all causes of cancer death in the world (22). Colorectal, gastric and esophageal cancers are the third, fourth and eighth most common cancers with 1.4, 1 and 0.45 million new cases in 2012, respectively (23). GI cancers are considered as multifactorial diseases, complex relationships between genetics, epigenetics, immunity, environmental factors, diet and lifestyle that can interact with the gut microbiota and functions during the tumor genesis and growth (24, 25). Probiotic microorganisms used in human nutrition Mostly as pharmaceutical products; mostly as food additives Selection criteria for probiotic strains There has been an increased interest in the scientific community on the use of probiotic therapy for prevention and treatment of a number of GI disorders, including irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), pathogenic bacterial or viral infection, and antibiotic associated diarrhea (26, 27). There is also epidemiological evidence that supports a protective role of probiotics against cancer (28). Substantial research has demonstrated that probiotics possess anti-proliferative or pro-apoptotic activities in GI cancers, among which colonic cancer cells and gastric cancer cells were most commonly studied (29, 30). Several studies were performed on the health benefits of milk fermented with Lactobacillus casei and L. acidophilus and the results indicate the positive effects of these probiotics on increase of tumor cell apoptosis (31, 32). Previous studies indicated the anti-proliferative role of L. rhamnosus GG strain in both human gastric cancer cells and colonic cancer cells (33-35), while another probiotic product named Bifidobacterium adolescentis SPM0212 inhibited the proliferation of three human colon cancer cell lines including HT-29, SW 480, and Caco-2 (36). Other probiotic products or strains that exerted antitumor activities against human colon cancer cells included Bacillus polyfermenticus (37), L. acidophilus 606 (38), LGG/Bb12 (39), and LGG/Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis (40). In addition, Cousin et al. reported that fermented milk containing Propionibacterium freudenreichii enhanced the cytotoxicity of camptothecin that was used as a chemotherapeutic agent for gastric cancer (41). Clinical trials of probiotics interventions for prevention, post-operative complications and treatment of CRC Colorectal cancer Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide with more than 1 million new cases annually and is responsible for death of more than 500,000 people (42). Evidence has shown that taking probiotics is a protective approach for proper maintaining of healthy gut microbiota and also reducing the risk of colon cancer risk (43). Contrary to many in-vitro and in-vivo studies in animal models and cancer cell lines of human, few randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) studies have reported the effect of probiotics on prevention and inhibition of intestinal carcinogenesis (44-46). The benefits of probiotics are not only limited to the prevention of intestinal cancers, but they can also include the prevention of symptoms and complications in patients undergoing colorectal surgery for cancer and who receiving intestinal cancer treatment (8, 47-51). In table 3 we summarized the results of clinical trials studies regarding the effect of probiotics intervention for prevention or/and treatment of colorectal cancers.
Table 3

Clinical trials of probiotics interventions for prevention, post-operative complications and treatment of CRC

Type of interventionPatientsProbiotic strainLength of treatment OutcomeRef
Prevention38 healthy patients L. rhamnosus 4 weeksReduce of b-glycosidase activity by 10% and urease activity by 13%(44)
17 healthy patients RS vs. BF lactis4 weeksInduced unique changes in fecal microflora but did not significantly alter any other fecal, serum, or epithelial variables.(45)
10 CRC and 20 healthy patients L. gasseri (LG21)12 weeksA deterioration of the intestinal environment was observed in the colorectal cancer patients in comparison to the healthy controls, and the intestinal environment improved when probiotics was taken.(46)
Prevention of post-operative complication100 CRC patients undergoing surgery (placebo group/ probiotics group n=50/50) L. plantarum L. acidophilus B. longum 16 daysImprovement in the integrity of gut mucosal barrier anddecrease in infections complications(8)
124 CRC patients undergoing surgery (placebo group/ probiotics group n=80/84) L. acidophilus L. plantarum B. lactis BB S. boulardii15 daysDecreased the rate of all postoperative major complication,gene expression of TNF and circulating concentrations of IL-6 were under the control of SOCS3 in the probiotics group(47)
156 CRC patients undergoing surgery (placebo group/ probiotics group n=81/75) E. faecalis C. butyricum B. mesentericus 15 daysProbiotic treatment reduce superficial incisional surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients undergoing CRC surgery(48)
60 CRC patients undergoing surgery(placebo group/probiotics group n=30/30) B. longum L. acidophilus E. faecalis 12 daysFaster recovery of bowel function, lower incidences of diarrhea, and slightly lower rate of bacteremia.in probiotic group(49)
Chemotherapy and radiation therapy related toxicity150 CRC patients undertreated L. rhamnosus GG24 weeksPatients had less diarrhea, less abdominal pain, less hospital care, and had fewerchemo dose reductions due to bowel toxicity(50)
490 gynecological cancer and CRC patients VSL#3(a mixture of 8 probiotics)From the 1st day ofradiation therapySignificant decrease of diarrhea (31.6 vs. 51.8%) andSevere diarrhea (1.4 vs. 55.4%) (51)
Clinical trials using probiotics in association with combination therapy of H. pylori eradication Increase, decrease, no effect Clinical trials of probiotics interventions in patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) Anti-carcinogenic mechanisms of probiotics The results of few clinical trial studies showed the effect of probiotics on manipulate the composition of gut microbiota, thus positively affect the host by improving intestinal barrier integrity, inhibiting growth of pathogens, reducing metabolism of pro-carcinogenic substances (44-46). Therefore, probiotics are effective in preventing and inhibiting the growth of intestinal cancer. In addition, several RCTs studies demonstrate that the use of probiotics in patients undergoing abdominal surgery is a promising approach to the prevention of post-operative superficial incisional surgical site infections (SSIs) and improvement in the integrity of gut mucosal barrier (47-49). Furthermore, the patients’ quality of life was also improved, shortening the duration of post-operative hospital stay and the period needed for antibiotics administration. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy as the conventional therapies for cancers can changes in the composition of the gut microbiota; these disruptions could also participate in the development of mucositis, particularly diarrhea and bacteraemia (52, 53). The prevention of cancer therapy-induced mucositis by probiotics has been investigated in randomized clinical trials with some promising results. Two trial studies on CRC patients who were undergoing chemotherapy and radiotherapy indicated a significantly decreased incidence of diarrhea by administration of L. rhamnosus GG and VSL#3 (a mixture of 8 probiotics) (50, 51). Gastric cancer Gastric cancer (GC) represents the second cause of cancer-related death worldwide, accounting for approximately 10% of newly diagnosed cancers (23). Although GC incidence rate declined in recent last years, the 5 year survival rate of this neoplasm is under 25% with regional variations (54). Studies on probiotics and gastric cancer are mainly focused on eliminating Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection as the major risk factors of gastric cancer (GC) (55). H. pylori is a Gram-negative bacterium which can disrupt the acid mucus barrier and colonize the gastric epithelium, is found in patients who are suffering from chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer and gastric cancer (56, 57). Inhibitory effects of probiotics on H. pylori infection have been observed in several animal models containing B. bifidum, L. acidophilus, L. rhamnosus, L. salivarius and several other probiotic strains (58). In recent years, the success of eradication therapies of H. pylori by combination therapy of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and two antibiotics therapy (clarithromycin plus amoxicillin or metronidazole) has been declined, due to the development of H. pylori resistant strains. According to recently meta-analysis, using probiotics as a supplementation with antibiotic therapy is very useful to the H. pylori eradication (59-61). In table 4 we summarized the results of clinical trials studies regarding the effect of probiotics in association with antibiotics treatment in eradication of H. pylori colonization. The results of these studies suggest that probiotic supplementation during antibiotic therapy to H. Pylori eradication, decreases adverse side effects, resulting in better compliance and, in some cases, improved rates of eradication. In addition, gastric tumor promoting proliferation of lymphoid tissue disappeared after successful eradication (62, 63). One of the proposed mechanisms for probiotic treatment is that these microbes can be present in the stomach and even live in it temporarily, increase the immune response and reduce the effect of H. pylori inflammation on the host gastric mucosa (64).
Table 4

Clinical trials using probiotics in association with combination therapy of H. pylori eradication

PatientsProbiotic strainLength of treatment OutcomeRef
120 dyspeptic adults L. acidophilus LB10 daysEradication rate , side effects (93)
60 asymptomatic adults L. rhamnosus GG14 daysEradication rate , side effects (94)
120 asymptomatic adults L. rhamnosus GG14 daysEradication rate , adverse effects (95)
160 dyspeptic adults L. acidophilus La5B. lactis Bb124 weeksEradication rate , adverse effects (96)
85 asymptomatic adults L. rhamnosus GGS. boulardiiL. acidophilus La5B. lactis Bb122 weeksEradication rate , adverse effects (97)
70 dyspeptic adultswith resistant H. pylori L. casei sspL. casei DG10 daysEradication rate , adverse effects (98)
86 dyspeptic children L. casei 2 weeksEradication rate , adverse effects (99)
40 dyspeptic children L. reuteri 20 daysEradication rate , adverse effects (100)
138 dyspeptic adultswith resistant H. pylori L. acidophilus La5 B. lactis Bb124 weeksUrease activity during pretreatment, eradication rate , side effects (101)
65 children B. animalis L. casei unclearEradication rate (102)
118 individuals L. rhamnosus LC P. freudenreichii B. breve 4 weeksEradication , urease activity , gastritis and H. pylori colonization (103)
90 individuals L. reuteri 6 weeksEradication rate (104)

Increase,

decrease,

no effect

Other GI cancers Unlike many studies on CRC and GC, there are few studies that suggest probiotic role in the prevention and treatment of other GI cancers such as pancreas and liver cancer. Pancreatic cancer is the 12th most common cancer in the world with 338,000 new cases and 7th most frequent cause of death worldwide with 331,000 deaths per year, but the etiology is still unknown (23, 65). Some previous studies supports a multifaceted role of probiotics in preventing pancreatic cancer by modulating pancreatitis and other risk factors such as diabetes, pancreatic necrosis, inflammation and obesity (66-68). Table 5 shows the results of clinical trials studies regarding the effect of probiotics on severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). The results of meta-analysis on six clinical trial studies indicate that probiotics did not significantly effects on the clinical outcomes of patients with SAP (69). Therefore, the available data are not sufficient to draw conclusions about the effects of probiotics in pancreatic cancer because of the limited number of trials and their heterogeneity. The types of probiotics and treatment strategies are very important in the heterogeneity of clinical outcomes reported in different RCTs.
Table 5

Clinical trials of probiotics interventions in patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP)

PatientsProbiotic strainLength of treatmentOutcomeRef
45 SAP patients L. plantarum 7 daysreducing pancreatic sepsis and the number of surgical interventions(67)
25 SAP patients B. longum L. bulgaricus S. thermophilus 7 daysThe time of abdominal pain alleviation, serum amylase restoration, the incidence rate of complications and mean of hospitalization were significantly decreased in group treated with probiotics(105)
62 SAP patients P. pentosaceus L. mesenteroides L. paracasei L. plantarum with bioactive fibers7 dayssymbiotic may prevent organ dysfunctions in the late phase of severe acute pancreatitis(66)
298 SAP patients L. acidophilus L. casei L. salivarius L. lactis B. bifidum B. lactis 28 daysProbiotic prophylaxis with this combination of probiotic strains did not reduce the risk of infectious complications and was associated with an increased risk of mortality.(68)
90 SAP patients P. pentosaceus L. mesenteroides L. paracasei L. plantarum with bioactive fibersunclearSynbiotic supplements was associated with lower infection rate lower rate of surgical interventions, shorter ICU and hospital stay and reduced mortality rate(106)
70 SAP patients B. longum L. bulgaricus E. faecalis 14 daysEarly enteral nutrition (EN) with addition of probiotics resulted in significant lowering of the level of pro-inflammatory cytokines, earlier restoration of gastrointestinal function, decrease of complications and shortening of hospitalization(107)
Liver cancer is the fifth most common cancer in men and the ninth in women and is the second most common cause of death from cancer worldwide, estimated to be responsible for nearly 746,000 deaths in 2012 (23). The gut microbiome has been related to the development of liver disorders such as liver fibrosis (70), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (71) and more recently, liver cancer (72). In the previous year, it was reported that probiotics inhibit hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) progression in mice (73). Feeding a probiotics mixture to tumor-injected mice could shift the composition of gut microbiota and reduce the size of liver tumors. In addition to the reduction of tumor size, angiogenic factors were down regulated by probiotics administration. Anti-carcinogenic mechanisms of probiotics on GI cancers Theoretically, probiotics are able to reduce cancer risk by several mechanisms. Oral administration of probiotics has multiple effects such as normalization of gut microbiota, improvement of the gastrointestinal barrier, inhibition of potential pathogens, anti-inflammatory activities and suppression of tumor formation and growth. Figure 1 presents a scheme of the possible anti-carcinogenic mechanisms of probiotics.
Figure 1

Anti-carcinogenic mechanisms of probiotics

Probiotics have abundant anticancer benefits and have a major impact on the quantitative and/or qualitative changes of the intestinal microbiota. The intestinal microbiota has been linked to GI cancer development also by production of toxic and genotoxic bacterial metabolites that can lead to mutations by binding specific cell surface receptors and affecting intracellular signal transduction. Specific strains of bacteria are involved in the pathogenesis of cancer, including Streptococcus bovis, Bacteroides, clostridia, and H. pylori (74-76). On the contrary, some bacterial strains, including L. acidophilus and B. longum, inhibit carcinogenic tumor growth in the colon (77, 78). Thus, a balance between “detrimental” and “beneficial” bacteria has implications in setting the stage for cancer. Shifting the proportion of microbes has been reported to influence carcinogen bioactivation and thus cancer risk. It is increasingly apparent that dietary components can significantly modify this balance. In addition, probiotics also affect the intestinal microbiological compositions, thus positively affect the host by improving intestinal barrier integrity, inhibiting growth of pathogens, reducing metabolism of pro-carcinogenic substances. The benefits of probiotics are not only limited to the prevention and inhibition of carcinogenic agents, but they can also include the therapeutic effect and the prevention of cancer treatment complications. The therapeutic effect of probiotics can be due to the production of antimicrobial compounds such as bacteriocins and antibiotics. Bacteriocins produced by LAB are peptides or small proteins that are frequently inhibitory towards many undesirable bacteria, including food-borne pathogens (79). It has also been suggested that LAB or a soluble compound produced by the bacteria may interact directly with tumor cells in culture and inhibit their growth (36). The competitive behavior of probiotics with pathogens is related to adhesion to epithelial cells (80). Several studies that characterized LAB from different origins has shown that the ability to adhere to epithelial cells is strain dependent (81-83). The suppressive effect of probiotics was also associated with production of short chain fatty acids (SCFAs), which could be reflected, by the enrichment of SCFAs-related pathway (84, 85). Chronic inflammation has been recognized as a risk factor of cancer (86). For example; inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a risk factor of colon cancer and the risk of HCC can be increased by inflammatory conditions, such as hepatitis B, C virus infection (87). Inflammation not only plays a role in colitis-associated colon cancer, but may also happen in sporadic colon cancer and affect the progression of cancer (88, 89). L. rhamnosus GG was reported to prevent colon carcinogenesis, accompanied by the suppression of NFkB pathway (90), a pro-inflammatory pathway that links IBD and colon cancer (91, 92). Li et al. (73) showed a reduction of pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-17 by probiotics in HCC model, revealing the possible relationship between immunomodulatory effect and anticancer effect of probiotics.

Conclusion

Probiotics have become very important in medicine because of their useful effects on the host health. Numerous in vitro studies and animal models show positive effects of probiotics on gastrointestinal cancers by various mechanisms, including anti-carcinogenic effects, anti-mutagenic properties, modification of differentiation process in tumor cells, production of short chain fatty acids, alteration of tumor gene-expressions, activation of the host’s immune system, inhibition of the bacteria that convert pro-carcinogens to carcinogens, alteration of colonic motility and transit time, as well as reduction of intestinal pH to reduce microbial activity. Different mechanisms can be involved in these beneficial effects, mainly via modulation of gut microbiota, which thereby influences host metabolism and immunity. Nevertheless, human clinical trials of the application of probiotics as bio therapeutics against cancer with adequate follow-up results are still lacking. Therefore, extensive clinical trials studies on human are required to identify the potential strains, dosages and administration regimes for specific types and stages of cancer as an alternative therapy for cancer treatment
  106 in total

Review 1.  Emerging cytokine networks in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nathan R West; Sarah McCuaig; Fanny Franchini; Fiona Powrie
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 53.106

2.  Effect of a probiotic food as an adjuvant to triple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection in children.

Authors:  Cinthia G Goldman; Domingo A Barrado; Norma Balcarce; Eduardo Cueto Rua; Masaru Oshiro; María L Calcagno; Mariana Janjetic; Julián Fuda; Ricardo Weill; María J Salgueiro; Mauro E Valencia; Marcela B Zubillaga; José R Boccio
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 4.008

3.  Use of probiotics for prevention of radiation-induced diarrhea.

Authors:  P Delia; G Sansotta; V Donato; P Frosina; G Messina; C De Renzis; G Famularo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Taxonomy of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria.

Authors:  Giovanna E Felis; Franco Dellaglio
Journal:  Curr Issues Intest Microbiol       Date:  2007-09

Review 5.  Review article: common misconceptions in the management of Helicobacter pylori-associated gastric MALT-lymphoma.

Authors:  J P Gisbert; X Calvet
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 8.171

6.  Recommendations for probiotic use-2011 update.

Authors:  Martin H Floch; W Allan Walker; Karen Madsen; Mary Ellen Sanders; George T Macfarlane; Harry J Flint; Levinus A Dieleman; Yehuda Ringel; Stefano Guandalini; Ciaran P Kelly; Lawrence J Brandt
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.062

7.  Effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG on proliferation and polyamine metabolism in HGC-27 human gastric and DLD-1 colonic cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Antonella Orlando; Caterina Messa; Michele Linsalata; Aldo Cavallini; Francesco Russo
Journal:  Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.730

8.  IL-6 and Stat3 are required for survival of intestinal epithelial cells and development of colitis-associated cancer.

Authors:  Sergei Grivennikov; Eliad Karin; Janos Terzic; Daniel Mucida; Guann-Yi Yu; Sivakumar Vallabhapurapu; Jürgen Scheller; Stefan Rose-John; Hilde Cheroutre; Lars Eckmann; Michael Karin
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 31.743

9.  Effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG on the cell growth and polyamine metabolism in HGC-27 human gastric cancer cells.

Authors:  Francesco Russo; Antonella Orlando; Michele Linsalata; Aldo Cavallini; Caterina Messa
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.900

10.  Specific probiotic strains and their combinations counteract adhesion of Enterobacter sakazakii to intestinal mucus.

Authors:  Maria Carmen Collado; Erika Isolauri; Seppo Salminen
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 2.742

View more
  12 in total

1.  Effects of probiotic, cinnamon, and synbiotic supplementation on glycemic control and antioxidant status in people with type 2 diabetes; a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Hossein Mirmiranpour; Hasan Fallah Huseini; Hoda Derakhshanian; Zohreh Khodaii; Bahareh Tavakoli-Far
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2019-12-23

Review 2.  The Bacterial Microbiota of Gastrointestinal Cancers: Role in Cancer Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Perspectives.

Authors:  Lina Elsalem; Ahmad A Jum'ah; Mahmoud A Alfaqih; Osama Aloudat
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-05-06

3.  Probiotics Upregulate Trefoil Factors and Downregulate Pepsinogen in the Mouse Stomach.

Authors:  Ghalia Khoder; Farah Al-Yassir; Asma Al Menhali; Prashanth Saseedharan; Subi Sugathan; Catherine Tomasetto; Sherif M Karam
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 4.  Probiotics in Medicine: A Long Debate.

Authors:  Elisavet Stavropoulou; Eugenia Bezirtzoglou
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 7.561

5.  Exposure to diesel exhaust particles results in altered lung microbial profiles, associated with increased reactive oxygen species/reactive nitrogen species and inflammation, in C57Bl/6 wildtype mice on a high-fat diet.

Authors:  Sarah Daniel; Danielle Phillippi; Leah J Schneider; Kayla N Nguyen; Julie Mirpuri; Amie K Lund
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 9.400

Review 6.  An Update on the Effects of Probiotics on Gastrointestinal Cancers.

Authors:  Amirhossein Davoodvandi; Farzaneh Fallahi; Omid Reza Tamtaji; Vida Tajiknia; Zarrin Banikazemi; Hadis Fathizadeh; Mohammad Abbasi-Kolli; Michael Aschner; Maryam Ghandali; Amirhossein Sahebkar; Mohsen Taghizadeh; Hamed Mirzaei
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 7.  Microphysiological Engineering of Immune Responses in Intestinal Inflammation.

Authors:  Yoko M Ambrosini; Woojung Shin; Soyoun Min; Hyun Jung Kim
Journal:  Immune Netw       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 6.303

8.  Prebiotic activity of garlic (Allium sativum) extract on Lactobacillus acidophilus.

Authors:  Prayogi Sunu; Dwi Sunarti; Luthfi Djauhari Mahfudz; Vitus Dwi Yunianto
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2019-12-24

Review 9.  The Role of Glucosinolates from Cruciferous Vegetables (Brassicaceae) in Gastrointestinal Cancers: From Prevention to Therapeutics.

Authors:  Catarina Melim; Maria R Lauro; Isabel M Pires; Paulo J Oliveira; Célia Cabral
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 6.321

10.  Influence of low FODMAP-gluten free diet on gut microbiota alterations and symptom severity in Iranian patients with irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  Kaveh Naseri; Hossein Dabiri; Mohammad Rostami-Nejad; Abbas Yadegar; Hamidreza Houri; Meysam Olfatifar; Amir Sadeghi; Saeede Saadati; Carolina Ciacci; Paola Iovino; Mohammad Reza Zali
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.