| Literature DB >> 30425748 |
Ke Ma1, Jieyu Chen1, Liuyan Kuang1, Jianlu Bi2, Jingru Cheng3, Fei Li4, Xiaomin Sun1, Xiaoli Nie1, Yanyan Liu1, Ren Luo1, Xiaoshan Zhao1.
Abstract
Qi-deficiency (QX) is thought to promote the body's susceptibility to disease, but the underlying mechanism through which this occurs is not clear. We surveyed the traditional Chinese medicine constitution (TCMC) of healthy college students to identify those that were PH (balanced TCMC constitution) and QX (unbalanced TCMC constitution). We then used high-throughput sequencing of the 16SrRNA V3-4 region in fecal microbiota samples to identify differences between those obtained from PH and QX individuals. Our results demonstrated that the alpha diversity of QX samples was significantly lower than that of PH samples (p < 0.05) and that beta diversity was remarkably different in QX and PH samples. Four and 122 bacterial taxa were significantly overrepresented in QX and PH groups, respectively. The genera Sphingobium, Clostridium, and Comamonas were enriched in the QX group and had a certain pathogenic role. The QX group also showed a statistically significant lack of probiotics and anti-inflammatory bacteria such as Bifidobacterium and Bdellovibrio. The functional potential of QX bacterial taxa was reduced in fatty acid metabolism and butanoate metabolism. We contend that the imbalanced intestinal microbiota in QX and the following functional changes in metabolism influence immunity and energy metabolism, which could increase susceptibility to disease.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30425748 PMCID: PMC6218746 DOI: 10.1155/2018/1304397
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1The sequence flow diagram of inclusion criteria for PH samples and QX samples.
General situation.
| characteristics | QX (n = 19) | PH (n= 16) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 20.75 ±1.47 | 20.13±1.31 | 0.2007 |
| Sex (male /female) | 7/12 | 5/11 | 0.728 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 20.18±3.31 | 20.94±1.31 | 0.3951 |
| QX transformed score | 48.58±9.56 | 10.94±5.82 | — |
| Health Status Scores | 79.23±5.32 | 81.47±7.15 | 0.2962 |
No statistical significance between the two groups in age, sex, BMI, and health status scores (p>0.05).
Figure 2Bacterial alpha diversity in QX (blue) and PH (red) populations. Observed species, Shannon and Simpson indices demonstrate that the diversity in QX people is significantly lower than that in PH people. Mann-Whitney, p < 0.01.
Figure 3PCoA (unweighted) of intestinal microbiota in QX (blue) and PH (red) populations. Principal coordinate axis 1 (12.99% variability) and principal coordinate axis 2 (5.68% variability) highlight a clear clustering.
Figure 4Relative abundance of intestinal microbiota at phylum (a), family (b), and genus (c) levels in PH and QX populations based on 16SrRNA sequencing. (b) shows that the taxa median relative abundance at the family level is ≥ 1% of total abundance. (c) shows that the taxa relative abundance at the genus level is ≥ 1% of the total abundance within groups (c1) and individuals (c2).
Figure 5LefSe shows significantly discriminative features in QX (blue) and PH (red) populations. LDA > 2.0, p < 0.05. (a) Cladograms of the hierarchical structure. (b) Differential abundance bacterial taxa between the two groups presented as a histogram. The key microbiota taxa in QX were genus Sphingobium, Clostridium, and Comamonas.
Figure 6PICRUSt shows that the 21 predicted KOs significantly differ in their distribution in healthy QX (blue) and PH (red) populations. Functional modules involved in amino and nucleotide sugar metabolism and in RNA degradation are more abundant in QX than they are in PH. P < 0.05, Welch's t-test, Welch's inverted CI method, and effect size > 0.01.