| Literature DB >> 30425199 |
Hui-Zhu Liang1, Su-Fang Li1, Feng Zhang1, Man-Yan Wu1, Chang-Long Li1, Jun-Xian Song1, Chongyou Lee1, Hong Chen1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microparticles (MPs) are small extracellular plasma membrane particles shed by activated and apoptotic cells, which are involved in the development of atherosclerosis. Our previous study found that microRNA (miR)-19b encapsulated within endothelial MPs (EMPs) may contribute to the upregulation of circulating miR-19b in unstable angina patients. Hypoxia is involved in atherosclerosis as a critical pathological stimulus. However, it still remains unclear whether the increase of miR-19b levels in EMPs is related to hypoxia and if the effect of miR-19b - wrapped within EMPs - stimulates hypoxia on vascular endothelial cells. This study aimed to explore the changes of miR-19b in EMPs induced by hypoxia as well as their effects on endothelial cells.Entities:
Keywords: Angiogenesis; Cell Migration; Endothelial Microparticle; Hypoxia; MicroRNA-19b; Transforming Growth Factor-β2
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30425199 PMCID: PMC6247585 DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.245271
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chin Med J (Engl) ISSN: 0366-6999 Impact factor: 2.628
Figure 1EMP formation and characterization. (a) TEM micrograph of EMPs released from HUVECs. (b) Fluorescent beads of 1 μm were used to define the MP gate (gate events <1 μm; MP gate: R1). (c) Double-positive events for Annexin V-FITC and CD31-PE were used to identify EMPs and count for each sample. (d) Confocal microscopic images of calcein-AM-labeled HUVECs released membrane blebbing and vesicles after hypoxia (right) in comparison with normoxia (left). (e) Confocal microscopic images of calcein-AM-labeled EMPs. MP: Microparticle; EMP: Endothelial MP; TEM: Transmission electron microscopy; HUVECs: Human umbilical vein endothelial cells.
Figure 2EMPhypoxia inhibited migration and angiogenesis of HUVECs. HUVECs treated with EMPcontrol and EMPhypoxia were subjected to scratch migration, transwell migration, and tube formation assay. (a) Scratch migration image. Migration analysis was measured as a percentage of total cell-free area. (b) Transwell migration image. Migration analysis was measured as the total migration cell number. (c) Representative images of tube formation and the relative number of tube branches measured in random 10 photographic fields were presented. *P < 0.001, †P < 0.01 compared with EMPcontrol group. EMP: Endothelial microparticle; HUVECs: Human umbilical vein endothelial cells.
Figure 3EMPmiR-19b mimic suppressed migration and angiogenesis of HUVECs. (a) The expression levels of miR-19b in HUVECs treated with EMPs and validation of miR-19b in HUVECs were determined by RT-PCR and were normalized to RNU6B. HUVECs treated with EMPs for 24 h were subjected to (b) scratch migration and (c) transwell migration test for migration capability and (d) tube formation assay for angiogenic function. EMPNC mimic was used as control in tube formation assay. The data shown are as mean ± SE representative of three independent experiments. *P < 0.05, †P < 0.01; Vehicle, Lipofectamine 2000. EMP: Endothelial microparticle; HUVECs: Human umbilical vein endothelial cells; RT-PCR: Real-time polymerase chain reaction; NC: Negative control; SE: Standard error.
Figure 4Luciferase assays of miR-19b-binding sites on TGFβ2 3’UTR. (a) 3’untranslated region of TGFβ2 mRNA with the predicted target sites for miR-19b. (b) Nucleotide resolution of the predicted target sites: seed sequence (green), target sequence (red), evolutionarily conserved regions (blue), and mutated miR-19b-binding site (gray). (c) HUVECs were transfected with either wild-type 3’UTR TGFβ2 or mutant 3’UTR TGFβ2, along with the miR-19b mimic. Luciferase activities were normalized to Renilla activities. Results shown are as mean ± SE representative of three independent experiments. *P < 0.01. TGFβ2: Transforming growth factor-β2; HUVECs: Human umbilical vein endothelial cells; SE: Standard error.
Figure 5The effect of EMPhypoxia and EMPmiR-19b mimic on TGFβ2 expression in HUVECs. (b) TGFβ2 mRNA was measured by RT-PCR and normalized to GAPDH mRNA. The data were expressed as changes relative to the data of the cells treated by EMPNC mimic. (b) TGFβ2 expression was measured by Western blotting with GAPDH used as a loading control. Densitometry was performed and normalized to GAPDH expression level. The data shown are as mean ± SE of three independent experiments. *P < 0.05, †P < 0.01. EMP: Endothelial microparticle; TGFβ2: Transforming growth factor-β2; HUVECs: Human umbilical vein endothelial cells; RT-PCR: Real-time polymerase chain reaction; GAPDH: Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; NC: Negative control; SE: Standard error.