Literature DB >> 30424870

Acute Myocardial Infarction Outcomes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample).

Tomo Ando1, Oluwole Adegbala2, Emmanuel Akintoye3, Said Ashraf4, Alexandros Briasoulis3, Hisato Takagi5, Luis Afonso4.   

Abstract

One of the major causes of mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is acute myocardial infarction. Whether in-hospital outcomes and management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-STEMI (NSTEMI) are different in SLE patients compared with those without SLE from large, recent dataset is unclear. We queried the Nationwide Inpatient Database from 2005 to 2014 and identified STEMI and NSTEMI admissions with and without SLE. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were revascularization strategy (percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass surgery, or thrombolytics), medical therapy rates (no reperfusion), and major adverse clinical events. A propensity-matched cohort was created to compare these outcomes. Odds ratio (OR) was calculated from the propensity-matched cohort. A total of 321,048 STEMI admissions, of which 1,001 (0.31%) and 572,971 NSTEMI admissions, of which 2,134 (0.37%) were SLE, were identified. In those with STEMI, 882 SLE and non-SLE admissions were propensity-matched. In-hospital mortality (9.1% vs 11.8%, OR 0.75, p = 0.07), revascularization strategy, medical therapy rates, and major adverse events were similar. Similarly, in those with NSTEMI, 1,770 SLE and 1,775 non-SLE were matched. In-hospital mortality (4.1% vs 4.50%, OR 0.90, p = 0.51), coronary artery bypass surgery, medical therapy rates, and major adverse events were mostly similar but the rate of percutaneous coronary intervention was higher in SLE (32.9% vs 29.6%, OR 1.16, p = 0.04). For both STEMI and NSTEMI, hospital cost and length of stay were similar between SLE and non-SLE cohorts. From a large administrative database in the United States, revascularization strategies and in-hospital outcomes of acute coronary syndrome were mostly similar between SLE and non-SLE.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30424870     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.09.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

Review 1.  Spontaneous coronary artery dissection in systemic lupus erythematosus: case-based review.

Authors:  Bonifacio Álvarez-Lario; Laura Álvarez-Roy; Sandra Mayordomo-Gómez; Juan Marcos García-García
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 2.  Cardiovascular Outcomes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Authors:  Shrilekha Sairam; Amit Sureen; Jesus Gutierrez; The Q Dang; Kunal Mishra
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Acute myocardial infarction in a patient positive for lupus anticoagulant: a case report.

Authors:  Kota Murai; Kenji Sakata; Tadatsugu Gamou; Yoji Nagata; Hayato Tada; Masaya Shimojima; Hirofumi Okada; Kenshi Hayashi; Masa-Aki Kawashiri
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  The effect of a seven-step rehabilitation training program on cardiac function and quality of life after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Xuemei Peng; Jianhui Zhang; Lihong Wan; Hui Wang; Wuning Zhang
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.088

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.