Elisa Benelli1, Giorgio Longo2, Egidio Barbi2,3, Irene Berti3. 1. Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Via dell'Istria, 65, 34137, Trieste, Italy. elisa.benelli@gmail.com. 2. Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Via dell'Istria, 65, 34137, Trieste, Italy. 3. Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", 34137, Trieste, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cold-induced urticaria is a kind of physical urticaria characterized by the appearance of wheals after exposure to cold. The atypical form is a rare sub-type characterized by appearance of hives even in areas not directly exposed to the cold and by a negative cold stimulation test. Its diagnosis is often challenging because of the lack of specific tests and it is usually based on the patient's clinical history. Hypotension due to generalized exposure to the cold is described both in the typical and the atypical forms. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe a 9-year-old boy who, at the beginning of the summer after the first swim in the sea, developed generalized urticaria, dyspnea, conjunctival hyperemia, blurred vision and loss of strength. The child was treated with intramuscular steroid and intravenous antihistamine, and the symptoms quickly resolved. Insect bite, contact with fish and drug ingestion were denied, and no unusual food had been eaten before the swim. A tentative diagnosis was made of either aquagenic urticaria or cold urticaria, but the specific tests were negative. Although the cause was unknown, prophylactic treatment with antihistamines was prescribed but in spite of this, wheals developed all over the body, after every swim in the sea. The child then came to our attention and relying on clinical history a diagnosis of atypical cold urticaria was made: development of hives even in areas not directly exposed to cold and a negative response to the cold stimulation test, are the characteristic features of this rare form of cold urticaria. CONCLUSION: Atypical cold urticaria should be suspected in all cases of anaphylaxis related to cold exposure (i.e. contact with water) with a negative cold stimulation test.
BACKGROUND: Cold-induced urticaria is a kind of physical urticaria characterized by the appearance of wheals after exposure to cold. The atypical form is a rare sub-type characterized by appearance of hives even in areas not directly exposed to the cold and by a negative cold stimulation test. Its diagnosis is often challenging because of the lack of specific tests and it is usually based on the patient's clinical history. Hypotension due to generalized exposure to the cold is described both in the typical and the atypical forms. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe a 9-year-old boy who, at the beginning of the summer after the first swim in the sea, developed generalized urticaria, dyspnea, conjunctival hyperemia, blurred vision and loss of strength. The child was treated with intramuscular steroid and intravenous antihistamine, and the symptoms quickly resolved. Insect bite, contact with fish and drug ingestion were denied, and no unusual food had been eaten before the swim. A tentative diagnosis was made of either aquagenic urticaria or cold urticaria, but the specific tests were negative. Although the cause was unknown, prophylactic treatment with antihistamines was prescribed but in spite of this, wheals developed all over the body, after every swim in the sea. The child then came to our attention and relying on clinical history a diagnosis of atypical cold urticaria was made: development of hives even in areas not directly exposed to cold and a negative response to the cold stimulation test, are the characteristic features of this rare form of cold urticaria. CONCLUSION: Atypical cold urticaria should be suspected in all cases of anaphylaxis related to cold exposure (i.e. contact with water) with a negative cold stimulation test.
Authors: Gustavo Deza; Ana Brasileiro; Marta Bertolín-Colilla; Laia Curto-Barredo; Ramon M Pujol; Ana M Giménez-Arnau Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2016-07-30 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Luigia Brunetti; Ruggiero Francavilla; Vito L Miniello; Michael H Platzer; Domenica Rizzi; Maria Letizia Lospalluti; Lars K Poulsen; Lucio Armenio; Per Stahl Skov Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 10.793