| Literature DB >> 30424279 |
Wei Liu1, Rong An2,3, Chunqing Wang4,5, Zhen Zheng6, Yanhong Tian7, Ronglin Xu8, Zhongtao Wang9.
Abstract
Recently, nanosilver pastes have emerged as one of the most promising high temperature bonding materials for high frequency and high power applications, which provide an effective lead-free electronic packaging solution instead of high-lead and gold-based solders. Although nanosilver pastes can be sintered at lower temperature compared to bulk silver, applications of nanosilver pastes are limited by long-term sintering time (20⁻30 min), relative high sintering temperature (>250 °C), and applied external pressure, which may damage chips and electronic components. Therefore, low temperature rapid sintering processes that can obtain excellent nanosilver joints are anticipated. In this regard, we present a review of recent progress in the rapid sintering of nanosilver pastes. Preparation of nanosilver particles and pastes, mechanisms of nanopastes sintering, and different rapid sintering processes are discussed. Emphasis is placed on the properties of sintered joints obtained by different sintering processes such as electric current assisted sintering, spark plasma sintering, and laser sintering, etc. Although the research on rapid sintering processes for nanosilver pastes has made a great breakthrough over the past few decades, investigations on mechanisms of rapid sintering, and the performance of joints fabricated by pastes with different compositions and morphologies are still far from enough.Entities:
Keywords: electric current assisted sintering; laser sintering; nanosilver pastes; rapid sintering; spark plasma sintering
Year: 2018 PMID: 30424279 PMCID: PMC6082269 DOI: 10.3390/mi9070346
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the sphere-to-sphere model. Reproduced with permission from [49].
Figure 2Neck growth kinetics during the sintering process of nanosilver particles at different temperatures. Reproduced with permission from [51].
Figure 3Relationship between bonding parameters and tensile strength of the joints: (a) Bonding temperature; (b) Holding time at 250 °C. Reproduced with permission from [118].
Figure 4Compression tests on silver samples sintered by spark plasma sintering (SPS) at a low pressure (3 MPa), for a short dwell time (1 min), at a 300 °C, b 200 °C and c 150 °C. Reproduced with permission from [36].
Figure 5Relative density as a function of variable: (a) SPS temperature; (b) hold time. Reproduced with permission from [137].
Figure 6Scanning electron microscope (SEM) micrographs of nanosilver films: (a) heat treatment in air; (b) laser sintering. Reproduced with permission from [142].
Figure 7Comparison of shear strength: (a) Alternating Current (AC); (b) sintering time. Reproduced with permission from [161].
Figure 8Fracture surfaces of samples sintered with different current: (a) 5.50 kA; (b) 6.50 kA; (c) 7.00 kA; (d) 8.25 kA. Reproduced with permission from [161].
Comparison of different rapid sintering methods.
| Sintering Method | Sintering Time | Shear Strength | Cost | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hot-pressing | 30–90 min | 30–84 MPa | Low | [ |
| In-situ formation | 3–5 min | 50–70 MPa | Low | [ |
| Spark Plasma | 30–300 s | 30–100 MPa | Medium | [ |
| Laser | 1–15 s | 8–10 MPa | High | [ |
| Current | 0.1–1 s | 40–97 MPa | Medium | [ |