| Literature DB >> 30424128 |
Man Zhang1, Yichuan Dai2, Li Wen3, Hai Wang4, Jiaru Chu5.
Abstract
A localized maskless modification method ofEntities:
Keywords: atmospheric pressure plasma microjet; covalent grafting; gelatin; maskless surface modification; polyurethane
Year: 2018 PMID: 30424128 PMCID: PMC6187667 DOI: 10.3390/mi9040195
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Figure 1(a) The schematic of the atmospheric pressure plasma microjet (APPμJ) system; (b) photograph of the plasma microjet ejected from a 30 μm silicon micronozzle; (c) local magnified image of the APPμJ.
Figure 2(a) Schematic diagram of the inverted pyramid silicon micronozzle fabrication procedure; (b) The diagram of the silicon micronozzle; (c) Scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) images of the silicon micronozzle.
Figure 3Schematic diagram of the three-step surface modification protocol.
Figure 4Typical current–voltage waveforms of the atmospheric pressure He/O2 plasma microjet (APPμJ).
Figure 5Optical emission spectra of APPμJ under 0.6% O2–He gas mixture. (a) Optical emission spectra of the APPμJ under the same applied voltage of ±7.0 kV; (b) Different volumes of oxygen are added to obtain the optimum parameters.
Figure 6High-resolution C1s peak of (a) an untreated PU film and (b) a He/O2 plasma-treated PU film.
Atomic composition and concentration of chemical groups on the untreated sample and plasma-treated PU sample. (He/O2 microjet, treatment time: 300 s, helium flow rate: 1000 sccm, oxygen flow rate: 6.0 sccm, applied voltage: ±7.0 kV, nozzle–polymer distance: 1.0 mm).
| Sample | O/C Ratio (at%) | C–N (%) | C–C/C–H (%) | C–O (%) | C=O/O–C–O (%) | O–C=O (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Untreated | 29.18 | 3.41 | 71.22 | 14.52 | 10.84 | 0 |
| Treated | 35.23 | 19.40 | 34.93 | 27.86 | 15.60 | 2.21 |
Figure 7(a) Fluorescence microscope image of the gelatin immobilized PU film which can be divided into four regions (I–IV) depending on the fluorescence intensity; (b) Normalized fluorescent intensity profiles of the dash-dotted line in the fluorescence microscope image; (c) SEM images of plasma treated PU film.
Figure 8Raman spectra of the plasma-treated PU film. (a) The Raman spectra of 5 different regions (regions I–IV and the edge region) of the plasma-treated PU film and untreated PU film; (b) Further processed Raman signals of the plasma-treated PU film.
Figure 9Fluorescence microscope images of the gelatin immobilized PU films which were treated by plasma microjet with different O2/He mixed percentages (0.6–1.0%) for different times (3–6 min). Scale bar: 200 μm.