| Literature DB >> 30424082 |
Michel Challier1, Selda Sonusen2, Arne Barfuss3, Dominik Rohner4, Daniel Riedel5, Johannes Koelbl6, Marc Ganzhorn7, Patrick Appel8, Patrick Maletinsky9, Elke Neu10.
Abstract
Many promising applications of single crystal diamond and its color centers as sensor platform and in photonics require free-standing membranes with a thickness ranging from several micrometers to the few 100 nm range. In this work, we present an approach to conveniently fabricate such thin membranes with up to about one millimeter in size. We use commercially available diamond plates (thickness 50 μ m) in an inductively coupled reactive ion etching process which is based on argon, oxygen and SF 6 . We thus avoid using toxic, corrosive feed gases and add an alternative to previously presented recipes involving chlorine-based etching steps. Our membranes are smooth (RMS roughness <1 nm) and show moderate thickness variation (central part: <1 μ m over ≈200 × 200 μ m 2 ). Due to an improved etch mask geometry, our membranes stay reliably attached to the diamond plate in our chlorine-based as well as SF 6 -based processes. Our results thus open the route towards higher reliability in diamond device fabrication and up-scaling.Entities:
Keywords: color centers; diamond; diamond photonics; nanofabrication; quantum sensing
Year: 2018 PMID: 30424082 PMCID: PMC6187842 DOI: 10.3390/mi9040148
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Figure 1Quartz mask layout and morphology: (a) Formation of a trench close to the sidewalls: deflected ions (solid arrows) locally enhance the etch rate in comparison to regions that are only hit by non-deflected ions (dashed arrows); Part (b) depicts the improved mask layout and its effect on the trench formation. By cutting the mask’s sidewalls under an angle of roughly 30, we avoid ion deflection on the mask’s sidewalls; Laser-cut quartz masks before (c) and after RIE cleaning (d) of the laser cut edge [low magnification images: etching time 30 mins, plasma parameters see Table 1, SF/Ar cleaning (O)]. A change of morphology indicates the removal of the deposit in the laser cut as discernible from the insets [inset: etching time 60 min, plasma parameters see Table 1, SF/Ar cleaning (S)]. Note that all masks initially undergo cleaning in a boiling tri-acid mixture (1:1:1 HNO:HSO:HClO, 5 mL each) and subsequent ultrasonic cleaning in acetone and isopropanol to coarsely remove deposit and residual glue/resist.
Plasma recipes used in this work. Ar/SF cleaning removes deposit from laser cutting from the quartz masks. The recipes used in the Sentech reactor in Basel, marked with (S), and the Oxford reactor in Saarbrücken, marked with (O), slightly differ but lead to comparable results. We note that the Cl-based recipe is run on a ceramic based carrier system, while the SF-based deep etch is run on standard silicon carrier wafers. Anode temperature is set to 20 C. For the SF-based deep etch, the etch rate in parenthesis gives the rate at which the Ar/SF/O erode the quartz mask.
| Plasma | ICP Power (W) | RF Power (W) | DC Bias (V) | Gas Flux (sccm) | Pressure (Pa) | Etch Rate (nm/min) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ar/SF | 700 | 100 | 170 | SF | 1.2 | 97 |
| Mask clean (O) | Ar 20 | |||||
| Ar/SF | 700 | 220 | 150 | SF | 2 | 161 |
| Mask clean (S) | Ar 50 | |||||
| Cl | 400 | 100 | 200 | Ar 25 | 1 | 35 |
| Diamond deep etch | Cl | |||||
| (S) | 700 | 50 | 110 | O | 1.3 | 126 |
| SF | 700 | 100 | 170 | SF | 1.2 | 67 |
| Diamond deep etch | Ar 20 | |||||
| (O) | 700 | 100 | 160 | Ar 15 | 1.6 | 87(51) |
| SF | ||||||
| O |
Figure 2Electron microscopy characterization of the etched membranes: (a) Cross-sectional view of a membrane etched using our SF-based recipe. The membrane’s thickness at its edge as deduced from this image is 2.8 m. A trench with a depth of 0.8 m is visible in the image; (b) View of a membrane etched using the Cl-based process (taken under ≈80 ). For the membrane etched in the Cl-based process, the mask is still attached. In case of the Cl-based process, a needle wall had to be removed mechanically from the outer edge of the membrane. This process occasionally leads to cracks in the membrane. In contrast the outer edge of the membrane etched in the SF-based process is smooth without further treatment.
Figure 3Interference fringes of the etched membranes recorded using a confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM): (a) Thickness homogeneity of a membrane etched with the SF-based recipe. The thickness of the membrane at the outer edge (thinnest point) is 2.5 m as measured using SEM. The diamond membrane shows a thickness variation of 3.6 m along its long edge and a variation of 0.8 m along its short edge direction. Measured using a LEXT OLS4100 LSM (Olympus, Shinjuku, Japan) equipped with a 405 nm laser; (b) Membrane etched using the Cl-based process, compare Figure 2b. The thickness of this membrane at its outer edge is 2 m as measured using SEM. The encircled area illustrates the local variation of the trenching as described in the text. Measured using a VK-X210 LSM (Keyence, Osaka, Japan) equipped with a 408 nm laser.
Figure 4(a) Surface roughness of a membrane etched with the SF-based plasma process to thickness of 2.5 m. Image recorded using a FastScan-ScanAsyst atomic force microscopy (AFM, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) in tapping mode. The four encircled bumps exceed the chosen scale bar and are 9.3 nm high; (b) Membrane etched using the Cl-based process to a thickness of 9 m. Image recorded using a Dimension 3100 AFM in tapping mode. The two encircled bumps marked exceed the chosen scale bar and are 18 nm high.